- 3,464
- 891
It's a civilisation
Here's the page, for reference: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/The_Wilberforces
Here's the page, for reference: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/The_Wilberforces
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Invulnerability, Immunity and NLF
- Thread starter Dragonmasterxyz
- Start date
- 10,758
- 6,491
If it's dozens at a time, as opposed to over dozen distinct occasions. How do you know it's not an outlier?
- 19,123
- 6,335
About the OP:
Yes immunity is a NLF unless you lack the thing that the hax targets to begin with.
I really don't think that AI and robots should have immunity to mind manipulation. Stuff that involves the brain, sure. But if the mind is simply consciousness/sentience, it would work just fine on a sentient robot
Yes immunity is a NLF unless you lack the thing that the hax targets to begin with.
I really don't think that AI and robots should have immunity to mind manipulation. Stuff that involves the brain, sure. But if the mind is simply consciousness/sentience, it would work just fine on a sentient robot
- 3,464
- 891
They consistantly perform that same feat over and over again during the course of the book. Skimming it again tells me that they overcome a sustained assult by the Jones', at least seven times and even survive one of them hitting their ship with a literal supernova. It's one of the most major plot points that the Jones' couldn't destroy them using their conventional means, and had to resort to the magic stones.Andytrenom said:
- 8,438
- 3,293
@Kal
All depends on the functionality of the mind manip. If it is brain-based, like Ragyō Kiryüi, it would fail. If it is based on the metaphysical consciousness of the target, it would work on robots provided the robot has such metaphysicality.
All depends on the functionality of the mind manip. If it is brain-based, like Ragyō Kiryüi, it would fail. If it is based on the metaphysical consciousness of the target, it would work on robots provided the robot has such metaphysicality.
- 10,758
- 6,491
@Crim that seems like 4-C durability then.
- 10,758
- 6,491
What if the target is non existent? @Assalt @Kal
- 3,464
- 891
See above about it being a civilisation, so there is no durability heading
- 8,438
- 3,293
If the target is non-existent it can't do anything since it literally isn't there. If the character can do literally anything, even think, it exists in some form or fashion. Ergo why I hate the Nonexistent Physiology page and every character that is "non-existent". Like no, you're not non-existent, just not existent in a conventional or normal way.Andytrenom said:
Rant over
- 1,317
- 243
On the invulnerability stuff. Why does Magnamon have completely invulnerable on his page? When the invulnerability page itself says you can only have completely invulnerable if you are omnipotent. Which Magnamon is not.
- 15,637
- 5,392
This makes sense.
Immunity should have a page for itself, instead of being tagged on resistances, given how many misconceptions there are about it.
Immunity should have a page for itself, instead of being tagged on resistances, given how many misconceptions there are about it.
- 3,464
- 891
I'm gonna assume that the Invulnerability is a NLF and replace it with resistance to physical damage or something
- 15,637
- 5,392
Invulnerability only means you are invulnerable to damage at your tier/energy/whatever, generally speaking. It's not NLF past how some people interpret it.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,481
- 13,689
Like he's said a few times, he has it on a civ profile because civ profiles don't have durability, so there's really not anything to replace it with.Dargoo Faust said:
Maybe a note in the invulnerability's description that it's only shown to work up to 4-C attacks?
- 3,464
- 891
Thanks Agnaa!
GoldenScorpions
He/Him- 3,093
- 1,265
^ This. Many people have the misconception that Immunity isn't just "souless beings immune to soul manip" and other such cases, and think it also affects more regular scenariosDargoo Faust said:
GoldenScorpions
He/Him- 3,093
- 1,265
Would phrasing it "In-verse immunity to [X ability]" work?
- 24,183
- 3,938
I'd like to point out it was agreed the invulnerability on the DnD pages should be changed to "extreme resistance" (It's extremely good resistance) instead
- 16,606
- 1,791
I also kinda wanna toss this out here about the immunity to soul manipulation based on not having a soul:
There are soul manipulators whose soul manip works on inserting a soul or soul fragments into someone, so they would obviously work on people without Souls. Pucci comes to mind in that regard
There are soul manipulators whose soul manip works on inserting a soul or soul fragments into someone, so they would obviously work on people without Souls. Pucci comes to mind in that regard
- 995
- 229
Of course, immunity to something =/= immunity to every circumstance that can lead to said thing
For instance
Character x is immune to death due to being already dead.
Character y has resurrection/life and death manipulation and makes x "alive".
x is no longer absolutely immune to any death hax and can then be "killed".
For instance
Character x is immune to death due to being already dead.
Character y has resurrection/life and death manipulation and makes x "alive".
x is no longer absolutely immune to any death hax and can then be "killed".
- 9,978
- 2,015
I known that it was mentioned time ago but hacking Robots do not counts as mind manipulation, is technopathy and that is pretty different.
As for dead characters being immune to deatm manipulation is not always the case, theynare immune to conventional death manipulation, is not weird that there's a few death powers that can kill them (like Zeref, Shiki, the Nameless, etc).
As for dead characters being immune to deatm manipulation is not always the case, theynare immune to conventional death manipulation, is not weird that there's a few death powers that can kill them (like Zeref, Shiki, the Nameless, etc).
- 9,253
- 2,731
As for undead, it depends whether they are immaterial (like ghosts) or not (like vampires and zombies). It also depends how much their brain is damaged: if their nervous system is fine, then regular brain-wash and stuff can work, but if it's reduced to rotten pieces of flesh and blood, and yet the character can still function perfectly, probably not.
- 9,978
- 2,015
Conventional undeads can still be killed in a conventional way by causing them damage, but for practical ways they are immune to death manipulation (although of low level). Vampires no necessary are considered undeads, it depends of how the verse tread them.
- 15,332
- 7,563
They should also be immune to Soul Hax unless the verse uses an "every object has a soul" system.
- 3,904
- 684
I think all "Immunity" should be replaced with "High Resistance to". Since there's certain people that can still do things like manipulate souls on people that lack a soul and such in fiction.
- 14,575
- 5,876
I think the inmunity is enough. We just need to specify in some profiles that some abilities bypasses inmunities coming from the lack of the target.
- 3,904
- 684
I would just say "High" if you lack said thing also, since you'd need a higher form of the hax to affect them.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Soul haxxing someone who doesn't have a soul means that the claim of them not having a soul is false, not that it bypasses their immunity. That is logically impossible.
- 3,904
- 684
It's also logically impossible to inflict dead on already dead beings and spirits yet people have that and can do it.
- 14,195
- 2,574
That has to do with the meaning/status of death more than it being logically impossible. @Sans
- 3,904
- 684
Not EE nor concept manipulation. Just kills.
- 15,332
- 7,563
That is another can of worms we should get rid of. The way we treat nonexistence. See what Assalt said.
- 3,904
- 684
I think the problem is taking into account how fiction will treat non-existent characters. It's the same thing as FTL, being able to create energy, etc. Fiction(or the authors) just doesn't seem to care.
