- 12,662
- 9,597
The creators specifically said that when these characters crossover, they aren't the same power levels. So spawn was not 4B as he WAS NOT the spawn we know (and love). Basically an inferior copy.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Invincible Downgrade
- Thread starter ByAsura
- Start date
- Status
- 5,632
- 4,854
do you have this statement
- 12,662
- 9,597
- 9,222
- 3,365
id love that scan please
- 12,662
- 9,597
Source: https://www.cbr.com/issue-14-2
In case you don't know who Erik Larsen is, he has been with Image Comics since the early 90s, marking him as one of the oldest creators at the company. Unlike most creators there, he has held high positions within the company. From 2004 to 2008, he even served the publisher of Image Comics, taking responsibility for most titles produced by the company.
Last edited:
- 165,117
- 72,041
Yes. Erik Larsen has repeatedly stated that the Image characters cross over with each other, but it does not affect their individual storylines. For example, the Savage Dragon's original timeline's Earth has long since been destroyed, without that it affected any other Image characters than his own in the slightest.
As such, this follows our regular crossover rules, and the characters do not scale from each other.
We should probably mention that in notes sections for the Image Comics, Spawn, and Invincible verse pages.
As such, this follows our regular crossover rules, and the characters do not scale from each other.
We should probably mention that in notes sections for the Image Comics, Spawn, and Invincible verse pages.
Hellbeast
He/Him- 4,926
- 4,458
If memory serves the revisions were in 2018 so I’m sure we’re missing tons
- 410
- 379
Quick question but isn't Mark like a Senior of high school or something? Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought he was a teenager. Why does his Profile say early 20s?
Last edited:
- 4,282
- 6,663
The majority of the story occurs after he's graduated high school. Dunno if it's during his early 20s though. Most likely but I don't think they really give concrete ages or dates in the comic from what I remember.
- 165,117
- 72,041
Basically, it is perfectly fine if we use an accepted calculation blog for the planet-busting feat to rescale the characters, but if there are several calculations with different results for the feat in question, we need to decide which one that we should use.
- 165,117
- 72,041
Thank you for helping out.
@DemonGodMitchAubin @Mr._Bambu @Armorchompy @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Therefir @Ugarik @Wokistan
Would any of you be willing to evaluate which of the two following calculations of the same feat that is most reliable to use please?
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
@DemonGodMitchAubin @Mr._Bambu @Armorchompy @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Therefir @Ugarik @Wokistan
Would any of you be willing to evaluate which of the two following calculations of the same feat that is most reliable to use please?
Invincible: Nolan, Mark and Thaddeus commit severe TV show spoilers
vsbattles.fandom.com
Destruction of Viltrum - Invincible
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 15,332
- 14,979
ByAsura’s pulverization version looks better IMO and should be the one used, I’d much rather use pulverization than KE in this calc
- 165,117
- 72,041
Please remember to carefully read through and follow the instructions in our Common Editing Mistakes page, so no badly structured edits are made, and extensive cleanup work will not be necessary.
Since you will change the statistics for characters, also remember to update the tier categories at the bottoms of the profile pages.
Also, when you apply this revision, please insert a link to this thread into the edit summary boxes, so your edits are not mistaken for vandalism.
Since you will change the statistics for characters, also remember to update the tier categories at the bottoms of the profile pages.
Also, when you apply this revision, please insert a link to this thread into the edit summary boxes, so your edits are not mistaken for vandalism.
- 1,295
- 772
Seems reasonable.
- 1,295
- 772
Hmm
- 165,117
- 72,041
Well, it is up to the calc group to decide, not the rest of our staff, according to our rules, unless other staff members have information about the rationales for a few in themselves being false or somesuch, but it doesn't hurt to be polite.
- 19,597
- 15,942
Using the guidebook is a double edged sword, since it states that Omni-Man used space-warps to go FTL, meaning its questionable if this scales to their in-atmosphere or combat speed.
- 165,117
- 72,041
That is a very good point. We should preferably separate their flight/travel and combat speeds then.
- 533
- 43
Actually, surface gravity is directly proportional to mass and inversely proportional to radius.
- 165,117
- 72,041
- 19,597
- 15,942
I'm fine with DMUA version. But if we want to go with Asura's one I won't be against it.
Though personal I think its KE.
- 165,117
- 72,041
@Damage3245 @KieranH10 @Migue79Thank you for helping out.
@DemonGodMitchAubin @Mr._Bambu @Armorchompy @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Therefir @Ugarik @Wokistan
Would any of you be willing to evaluate which of the two following calculations of the same feat that is most reliable to use please?
Invincible: Nolan, Mark and Thaddeus commit severe TV show spoilers
Destruction of Viltrum - Invincible
Would you be willing to help out here as well please?
- 3,029
- 2,664
I mean, they both look fine math-wise. The first one seems to make sense since you can do the fragments and crater feats in one singular attack. But if you only hit with the energy to create the crater, then the fragments wouldn't be at that scale since less energy would be involved.
- 3,029
- 2,664
ByAsuras calc seems to give a source on the surface gravity of Viltrum, I believe one can get an actual size of the planet from this, if both calcs were fully adjusted to this I'd personally say both were valid tbh, one is calculating the crater upon impact and one is calculating the fragments that shot out of the other side, two feats in one so honestly they're both as valid as one another imo.
- 533
- 43
Ok, so I just got time to read this and I don't get what the op presented that everyone is like "I agree". How does an unstable core help them in that situation? Not only that, but the lack of information of the type instability that occurred. Going by the feats of the beam, the core would just have a very deep hole in it and that wouldn't even cause an instability since materials along the area of the hole would just be attracted to fill the gap caused by the beam and the fact planetary bodies don't depend on anything except their mass to be stable. The only argument I see here is the reduction of gravitational binding energy of the planet since mass is directly proportional to gravity. And I don't get how we came to the conclusion that because Thaddeus said they "Could die from the impact" translates to "They're incapable of destroying the planet" even assuming we were to take that as the meaning. Why are we taking Thaddeus statement as "Literal" when there are arguments that invalidate his statement? They made a hole in the core and that somehow makes the planet's whole gravity nullified? Making it easier for them to shatter the planet?. "It's fictional" is a very poor argument when this can just be regarded as a poorly constructed plot point and also the fact that even fiction follows a logic even if it contradicts ours but in this case there's no buildup or a base that establishes the materials in verse to function that way. It would be hard to argue if it was shown or we saw what the beam actually did to the core, but all we have is a "Statement" with no substantial backing to even take it as literal.
- 3,052
- 2,455
The Multi-Continent level calc was approved, when do we start updating the Invincible pages? Additionally, and I know this isn't a CRT, we should probably start adding stuff for Lifting Strength since there are quite a few good feats for that.
Also, someone should do something about Pitt's page since it's scaling off some evil AU Invincible but no feats of his own. I mean Dave Keown created him, worked on much of the Peter David run for Hulk in the 90s and did the Pitt/Hulk crossover and honestly that has more validity than Pitt scaling off Invincible lol
Also, someone should do something about Pitt's page since it's scaling off some evil AU Invincible but no feats of his own. I mean Dave Keown created him, worked on much of the Peter David run for Hulk in the 90s and did the Pitt/Hulk crossover and honestly that has more validity than Pitt scaling off Invincible lol
- 19,597
- 15,942
Like with Namek and some other planet destruction incidents they destabilized the core and caused a chain reaction explosion.
We can do so now or we can wait to find a usable tier for earlier Invincible forms then update everyone.
- Status
Similar threads
