• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Invincible: 5-A Upgrade

🤷‍♂️
It was rejected for some reason
We don't know how he accomplished this feat.

Did he stop it with one hand casually? Did it take him a few seconds with both hand? Did it take him dozens of seconds like Mark did to the asteroid he stopped? Did he even stop it at all, could it be possible he redirected it so it was no longer a threat to Earth?

All we know is that he diverted an asteroid the sizes of Texas. We can't say anything about how he stopped it without making a baseless assumptions.
 
We don't know how he accomplished this feat.

Did he stop it with one hand casually? Did it take him a few seconds with both hand? Did it take him dozens of seconds like Mark did to the asteroid he stopped? Did he even stop it at all, could it be possible he redirected it so it was no longer a threat to Earth?

All we know is that he diverted an asteroid the sizes of Texas. We can't say anything about how he stopped it without making a baseless assumptions.

literally take as little as possible, and just assume it was the same thing Mark did, not just say "yeah uselesss"
 
I agree with this CRT, and I believe logical evidence to prove X are as valid as empirical evidence, like we don't need a spoonfeeding statement to say a fish is a fish
 
I think chariot makes the most sense here given everything and every example he has said regarding to astrophysics while citing real world examples on why the Roche Limit, Density and Gravity do not corrlate to a larger planet necessarily.

Personally would not mind if Invincible escaped 5B hell and gets a higher tier.
 
We don't know how he accomplished this feat.

Did he stop it with one hand casually? Did it take him a few seconds with both hand? Did it take him dozens of seconds like Mark did to the asteroid he stopped? Did he even stop it at all, could it be possible he redirected it so it was no longer a threat to Earth?

All we know is that he diverted an asteroid the sizes of Texas. We can't say anything about how he stopped it without making a baseless assumptions.
Neither of these assumptions in their own right would significantly subtract the result
 
You know, with the claims of Agenda and Bias, and Steven Universe being thrown around... Yeah 9/10 that means that this thread is agenda'd and thus leads me to disagree because astrophysics is a funny thing.
ReaparMan is chaos incarnate. LMAO
giphy.webp
 
Back
Top