- 6,014
- 2,122
^This I see exactly what I said But no one care about my opinion owo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have 3-5 words explaining them that still leave us with no idea of how the ability would actually end up working in a fight.Paul Frank said:If you click the list of Ajimu's listed skills they all have some sort of explanation next to them
What does her Ninja Skill "Defending Chance" do?Paul Frank said:I never said a good explanation it's still enough to tell what they do
I Think the real problem about the ban is about Ajimu's tiering, concerning the abilities, we are agree to only use the abilities Ajimu showed/Explained and scale them to IihikoSaikou The Lewd King said:If we don't know what an ability is, we just...don't use it. Like we would do with any other character.
Sure, I agree, but then she only has 11 skills, half of which are useless (one of them lets her count really high, one of them lets her specifically nullify another skill of hers, one of them lets her climb on ceilings). I want to do this for the purposes of determining Iihiko's resistances, but a lot of people would have a problem with giving a character with 12,858,051,967,633,865 skills only 3 that are battle-applicable, and calling any of those matches "notable".Saikou The Lewd King said:If we don't know what an ability is, we just...don't use it. Like we would do with any other character.
Hanten's banned in matches.O CARALOHO said:What about hanten? His ability os preety broken, why they make threads with lihiko and not with him? He is way more NLF, he is doesn't want to make more abilities because "plot problems"
All but 11 are too vague. Parasite Seeing, Alibi Block, Life Zero, and Five Focus are her combat applicable skills out of those 11.Paul Frank said:So you're trying to say that out of the 814 skills listed there all of them besides 5 are too vague to be used and only 3 are combat applicable
I have to disagree