- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #361
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Hyperdimension Neptunia General Discussion Victory II + Victory II Realize = V4R
- Thread starter AlexSoloVaAlFuturo
- Start date
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #364
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #366
I don't think that she would dislike that kind of beat.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #368
AlexSoloVaAlFuturo said:>Base Nepgear: At least Class 1, possibly Class 5RKGenki said:
>Base Uni: Class 1
>Nepgear can pin down Uni with strength
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #370
>9 months later
>Not a baby
I smell that this isn't the first time, Uni.
>Not a baby
I smell that this isn't the first time, Uni.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #372
I have 18+ pictures that say otherwise.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #374
Spoiler: I was thinking in make an "reading... abandon thread in 3, 2, 1..." with that GIF after this week.
Just look what she said, she really love it.
Just look what she said, she really love it.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #376
She want it.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #378
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #380
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #381
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #382
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #384
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #385
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #387
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #388
- 5,352
- 894
Yeaaaaaa i dont think i belong here.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #391
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #392
Mission accomplished again, 8 of 8.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #393
I have another question of the same feat of yestarday.ShrekAlmighty said:
Also, you belong where the people think in you.
- 5,352
- 894
Also, you belong where the people think in you.
Damn i really like that quote.
Sure thing il answer if i can.
Damn i really like that quote.
Sure thing il answer if i can.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #396
1) Matthew Schroeder pass this link of the same feat to enki some time ago:
https://www.narutoforums.org/xfa-bl...ut-with-a-boom-hyperdimension-neptunia.36398/
But since the character just moved the land masses and not destroyed them to use a fragmentation value, assuming something like that is wrong, right?
2) The value of the PE of the land masses have to be surpassed to move them, right?
3) What is the better way to calc the mass of one of the land masses in this case?
https://www.narutoforums.org/xfa-bl...ut-with-a-boom-hyperdimension-neptunia.36398/
But since the character just moved the land masses and not destroyed them to use a fragmentation value, assuming something like that is wrong, right?
2) The value of the PE of the land masses have to be surpassed to move them, right?
3) What is the better way to calc the mass of one of the land masses in this case?
- 5,352
- 894
1) Yes its wrong.
2) Since they are already levitating by some magical force holding them in place i would say yes.
3) Not sure on what do you mean by that?
Edit:Upon further thinking i would say that since distance moved is unknown PE value wouldnt necessarily need to be ovepowered, what would need to be overpowered is the Gravitational force of the object.
Gravitational force = (Gravitational constant x mass1 x mass2)/distance between them^2
2) Since they are already levitating by some magical force holding them in place i would say yes.
3) Not sure on what do you mean by that?
Edit:Upon further thinking i would say that since distance moved is unknown PE value wouldnt necessarily need to be ovepowered, what would need to be overpowered is the Gravitational force of the object.
Gravitational force = (Gravitational constant x mass1 x mass2)/distance between them^2
- 8,304
- 1,724
- 5,352
- 894
2) Yea edited that a bit... sorry
3) To calc the volume(And later on mass) of anything all you need to do is properly measure it and then use a volume formula for the shape which the object mostly resembles example a spears shaft/stick is cylindrical so you use the formula for the volume of a cylinder.
What Kepe did in the calc is measure the volume of Australia using Area x depth(or height) which gives you the volume, he did this as Australia is very irregular in its shape and cant fit into any volume formulas after which he went into moment of inertia but that is only used for Rotation kinetic energy feats/calcs
All in all you can use both the area x depth formula or try to find a volume formula which could work for the landmasses.
Edit: The depth/height in your case wouldnt include any kind of elevation or ocean height as in your case you are calculating the volume of separate landmasses not the continetal crust.
3) To calc the volume(And later on mass) of anything all you need to do is properly measure it and then use a volume formula for the shape which the object mostly resembles example a spears shaft/stick is cylindrical so you use the formula for the volume of a cylinder.
What Kepe did in the calc is measure the volume of Australia using Area x depth(or height) which gives you the volume, he did this as Australia is very irregular in its shape and cant fit into any volume formulas after which he went into moment of inertia but that is only used for Rotation kinetic energy feats/calcs
All in all you can use both the area x depth formula or try to find a volume formula which could work for the landmasses.
Edit: The depth/height in your case wouldnt include any kind of elevation or ocean height as in your case you are calculating the volume of separate landmasses not the continetal crust.
- 8,304
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #400
2) Don't worry. The distance between them is also unknown since the map that is above isn't the accurate one, but I can angsize the close distance in the first game where they appear time to time while moving. Is correct to assume that the 4 are at that distance and multiply the them all in just one calc for a safe lowball, right?
3) Yeah, my first calc here was about that, don't you remember?
Yeah, I know, it just slipped my mind to put it in my reply, tee hee~.I hate torque things, everything that was teached to you previously in just one place.
This one is one of the normal land masses, is there any volume formula to calc something like this? Or area one?
>edit
Yeah, I know, I was trying to say that I just need to pixelscale the elevation of one of the mountains and how below the land mass reach for the thickness/depth.
3) Yeah, my first calc here was about that, don't you remember?
Yeah, I know, it just slipped my mind to put it in my reply, tee hee~.
This one is one of the normal land masses, is there any volume formula to calc something like this? Or area one?
>edit
Yeah, I know, I was trying to say that I just need to pixelscale the elevation of one of the mountains and how below the land mass reach for the thickness/depth.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
