• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Hazbin Hotel - Immortality + Hax + Cosmic Feats + Adam Addition

Why are cherubs even apart of this discussion? why wouldn't they just not be invulnerable like angels? the same way imps are not as regenerative and survivable as sinners? that seems to make the most sense, considering they're harmed by imps and very clearly supposed to be the heaven equivalent to imps.
Frankly, no clue why it was accepted for Imps to just not have it. Considering same thing there.
 
I wanna make sure you guys are getting this, there is easily many many statements for Invulnerability and an entire episode is based on it. Currently there is only two actual antifeats, one of them is a background antifeat and the other is done to Lute where she loses her arm.

(Waiting for classic “he is totally unharmed bruh” ahhh response)
You guys are agreeing that we should completely remove the ability from everyone including higher tiered angels that lack antifeats that is stated time and time again and has an entire episode about, because there is two antifeats of exorcist with one of them being a minor detail in the background?
Do you want to selectively apply the statement about the Angels as a whole? Really? That’s… just dumb.
 

(Waiting for classic “he is totally unharmed bruh” ahhh response)

He very much clearly isn't harmed lmao Alastor doesn't even leave a mark on him, whether that be the stat difference or the invulnerability. him reacting to the impact of it doesn't mean he isn't invulnerable. invulnerability makes you immune to traditional attacks, it doesn't magically remove the impact of what's hitting you. it only removes the actual damage that impact would give you.
 
He very much clearly isn't harmed lmao Alastor doesn't even leave a mark on him, whether that be the stat difference or the invulnerability. him reacting to the impact of it doesn't mean he isn't invulnerable. invulnerability makes you immune to traditional attacks, it doesn't magically remove the impact of what's hitting you. it only removes the actual damage that impact would give you.
If I punch you into the face, I won’t leave a scratch either, but you will pretty much feel pain, growl loudly, go a couple of steps back and stroke the part where I hit you. And guess what? That’s exactly what happens here!

“Unharmed” would be just making no sound or reaction at all. Knowing Adam, he would just laugh it off standing in one place instead of doing what he did in the scene. But he didn’t.
 
If I punch you into the face, I won’t leave a scratch either, but you will pretty much feel pain, growl loudly, go a couple of steps back and stroke the part where I hit you. And guess what? That’s exactly what happens here!
No, punching someone in the face will leave a mark. that's the point of punching someone in the face. Adam was unharmed by every hit alastor threw out, even if he reacted to it.
 
No, punching someone in the face will leave a mark. that's the point of punching someone in the face. Adam was unharmed by every hit alastor threw out, even if he reacted to it.
It does not? You will have zero marks, you will just get hurt and that’s it. Do it with someone or watch any punching in face video lmfao.
 
No, punching someone in the face will leave a mark. that's the point of punching someone in the face. Adam was unharmed by every hit alastor threw out, even if he reacted to it.
Adam wears a mask and all we see are white particle effects then Adam taking a step back, we know from Lute that those masks can hide injuries. Also what Orange said.
 
Adam wears a mask and all we see are white particle effects then Adam taking a step back, we know from Lute that those masks can hide injuries.
Of course lets ignore Adam being surprised he could even be hurt against Charlie later on. Perfectly reasonable.
 
Adam wears a mask and all we see are white particle effects then Adam taking a step back, we know from Lute that those masks can hide injuries. Also what Orange said.
Im lik 99% sure once Adam's mask is broken in half you can't see a mark on his chin where he's hit.

Edit; even after the ass whooping he takes from Lucifer, he still has no damage to his chin. Alastor did **** with either hit.
 
Of course lets ignore Adam being surprised he could even be hurt against Charlie later on. Perfectly reasonable.
He is not surprised, he is just shouting outloud that it hurts and that’s it. He doesn’t say “for the first time in my life, I have been harmed by a mere peasant” or smth like that how you view it.
Im lik 99% sure once Adam's mask is broken in half you can't see a mark on his chin where he's hit.
Ignoring me huh?
Edit; even after the ass whooping he takes from Lucifer, he still has no damage to his chin.
So you want to say that Lucifer made no harm to him as well? LITERALLY?

Also, is this guy also perfectly unharmed since he has no marks on his face?

I can also give you a ton of VSBW profiles that get ratings by harming someone without leaving scars. Y’all either do not understand how harming works or just want to wank Adam/shit on Alastor.
 
He is not surprised, he is just shouting outloud that it hurts and that’s it. He doesn’t say “for the first time in my life, I have been harmed by a mere peasant” or smth like that how you view it.
First of all, Adam would never say that. Second of all he literally touches his injury and goes “****! That hurts??” straight up showing he is unfamiliar with being hurt. Listen to his tone Orange.
 
First of all, Adam would never say that
Obviously, I was just using a hyperbole.
Second of all he literally touches his injury and goes “****! That hurts??”
Not "??", but "!!". He does not question it - he just cries it out loud. And this does not imply this being the first time at all.
Also, why would he even be surprised, bro saw his own exorcists getting slaughtered by Angelic Weapons.
straight up showing he is unfamiliar with being hurt. Listen to his tone Orange.
His tone is the average mad Adam voice, bruh.
 
We should forget that Stolas moved out of the range of the explosion and opened a portal...o wait we didn't
She could have opened a portal without making any speed feat.
Also, again, reasoning for it scaling to reaction/combat speed is not legit at all.
 
She could have opened a portal without making any speed feat.
Also, again, reasoning for it scaling to reaction/combat speed is not legit at all.
she?man you are confusing people, also again, he only opens the portal after leaving the exploding star and for that, he would have to fly.
 
We never see Stolas actually flying, it’s really an assumption, hence why it is iffy, especially since he does have abilities to cut the distance.

he flies at the portal at the start of the song, also any other goetia uses a specific object to fly or move in the air.
 
I was saying that we were not shown that he flies in the speed feat, not that he cannot fly lmao.

This part is an assumption.
Ok, let's think for a moment, Stolas was on a moon, then the moon was destroyed, he floated away with his daughter, we moved away, the star exploded and the portal closed right after and somehow none of this is a speed feat?
 
Ok, let's think for a moment, Stolas was on a moon, then the moon was destroyed, he floated away with his daughter, we moved away, the star exploded and the portal closed right after and somehow none of this is a speed feat?
He could have opened a portal mid-way seeing that he is not that fast, etc.
Also, timeframe used in the calc is very iffy since it's not actually a timeframe of Stolas flying (since we don't see it happening on the screen), but more of a time it takes for him to "reappear", and the two are not exactly the same thing.
 
He could have opened a portal mid-way seeing that he is not that fast, etc.
Also, timeframe used in the calc is very iffy since it's not actually a timeframe of Stolas flying (since we don't see it happening on the screen), but more of a time it takes for him to "reappear", and the two are not exactly the same thing.
counterargument:
Stolas in another chapter left his mansion and went to where the IMP office was after Blitz called him and told him that his daughter took the grimoire (that lasted about 4 seconds) and he did it clearly without portals because he broke even the door (also only uses portals to travel between realms)also he is singing the song, like, when the characters are singing they are singing in reality in real time.
 
counterargument:
Stolas in another chapter left his mansion and went to where the IMP office was after Blitz called him and told him that his daughter took the grimoire (that lasted about 4 seconds) and he did it clearly without portals because he broke even the door (also only uses portals to travel between realms)also he is singing the song, like, when the characters are singing they are singing in reality in real time.
This... does not address my concerns at all.
 
No comment on the speed stuff, but everything else seems fine.
 
  • Didn't Vaggie get her head bashed in on a table? It sounded like it hurt, and I think there was blood.
Tbh that was done by Lute, an angel and Vaggie is a fallen angel which could mean she lost that privilage. Anyways like I previously said only the exorcist angels have antifeats, while others like Adam just have supporting feats such as him implying that he was unfamiliar with pain
 
Anyways like I previously said only the exorcist angels have antifeats, while others like Adam just have supporting feats such as him implying that he was unfamiliar with pain
For the one thousandth time:
  • He did not imply that at all.
  • He has a direct contradiction against Alastor.
  • Statements are generalized anyways, so they either apply to everybody or apply to no-one. There is no “compromise” here. (Also do note that all statements are referring to Angels overall when talking about Exorcists’ threat)
 
Tbh that was done by Lute, an angel and Vaggie is a fallen angel which could mean she lost that privilage.
There's no evidence of that, though. Also, Lucifer is still said to have his angelic power despite having fallen.
Anyways like I previously said only the exorcist angels have antifeats, while others like Adam just have supporting feats such as him implying that he was unfamiliar with pain
That's not solid enough to overturn the anti-feats. I would just stick with their invulnerability and invincibility as a reference to them being impossible to kill without their own weapons.
 
There's no evidence of that, though. Also, Lucifer is still said to have his angelic power despite having fallen.

That's not solid enough to overturn the anti-feats. I would just stick with their invulnerability and invincibility as a reference to them being impossible to kill without their own weapons.
The problem with that is that Sinners can still be hurt without ángelic weapons, and if they say they are invencible even with the weapons they use, then that means that either, they are invulnerable or all sinners are stupid for not trying to fight back
 
The problem with that is that Sinners can still be hurt without ángelic weapons, and if they say they are invencible even with the weapons they use, then that means that either, they are invulnerable or all sinners are stupid for not trying to fight back
I'm not talking about sinners.
 
I'm not talking about sinners.
You are saying Angels are immortal, just like sinners. But unlike Sinners who are stated to be "unkillable" Angels are specifically stated to be "unharmable". Plus Sinners straight up act like they are completely unstoppable even though by your and oranges logic they would have the same unstoppability of sinners
 
I’m pretty sure we concluded in Reaper’s thread that they act as unstoppable due to superior durability compared to regular Sinners.
 
The fact that very large number of Sinners is actually a thread to all of Heaven is possible only in superior durability scenario, not invulnerability.
That isnt evidence, thats speculation since we have no idea why they are a threat (entirely possible Lilith activates this and the rest of Heaven doesnt know she is under Adams control). I wont take that claim serious without any actual evidence towards it.
 
Mind giving any kind of evidence to support this claim?
How about like 95% of the cast being at least on the level of weak power Overlords?(Hi Husk)

You gotta remember the only guy dragging the rest down in scaling is Pentious who IS an average sinner and generally he only does minor damage to the rest of the cast from what we saw. He is an anti-feat generator, yes, but his power level is kind of what you'd expect from the average sinner walking around.
 
Back
Top