- 4,097
- 1,358
Infinite does have a secondary definition, yes.
2: extremely large or great
I posted it earlier in the dictionary.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
God of War Yggdrasil Low 1-C Justification
- Thread starter Aetheric Pariah
- Start date
- Status
2: extremely large or great
I posted it earlier in the dictionary.
- 6,127
- 4,208
And thus...infinite and endless needs to be treated same.
- 4,097
- 1,358
If endless and infinite is being treated same, we do have to rely on context in a fictional series as I don’t know enough verses that might have actually distinguish endless from infinite and if they do, then it is a different story there too.
- 4,097
- 1,358
I don’t know as that is where the confusion comes from tbh.
- 6,127
- 4,208
By default same words...untill proven otherwise.
- 6,127
- 4,208
That has already been addressed in last page.
- 4,097
- 1,358
I honestly don’t think it is wise to assume endless ≠ infinite as the tiering system make use of countably infinite in Tier 2A in a mathematics sense.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,636
Wiki treating it differently doesn't matter. The fact is that both words are synonyms. If the wiki has treated them differently somewhere purely because endless was used in place of infinity then that's a problem that needs to be fixed, not used as a standard.
- 6,127
- 4,208
....... >_>
I fail to see any relation
- 4,097
- 1,358
Actually, it is probably me just being confused if anything, but in any case. I believe we have to relied on staff input rather than decide for ourselves in this regard.
Hmm I probably have to ask Ultima regarding the usage of endless = infinite to resolve this particular problem
- 4,097
- 1,358
While they are synonyms which is true, I do like to argue that just because they are synonyms doesn’t mean we can give a free pass on them using the same meaning all the time as we both point out I think.
Also I will ask Ultima for this matter on his wall.
- 6,127
- 4,208
Call Ultima here pls.....
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,636
That's literally irrelevant because I was talking about both words in a vacuum. Based on context both of them can refer to finite things as well.
- 4,097
- 1,358
Alrighty then.
- 30,083
- 31,353
I renamed the thread based on what Impress requested.
- 582
- 312
BTW how does this wiki treat this statement? Is this not considered low 1-c?
Lormac_CC
He/Him- 2,370
- 943
Needs more context
- 582
- 312
its apparently a conversation between a fan and cory barlog, a writer of god of war saying that gods exist on a higher plane of existence, beyond time and space
Lormac_CC
He/Him- 2,370
- 943
Wouldn't get anything without more context
- 582
- 312
I gave you the context of the conversation, what further context are you asking for?
Scottycj256
He/Him- 1,765
- 907
the question the fan was asking that the writer replied to with that statement
- 582
- 312
- 582
- 312
^ the question leading to the statement i sent before im pretty sure
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,636
Context as in more context to the statement itself. Higher plane of existence and space time not having any power over them are a bit vague
- 582
- 312
not rlly, to me it appears super blatant and clear he is talking about transcending space and time in the sense of operating on a higher level of existence than it
but idk if this statement applies to yggdrasil, only gods, which is why i didnt put it in the thread earlier
but idk if this statement applies to yggdrasil, only gods, which is why i didnt put it in the thread earlier
- 32,811
- 38,005
Is it related to GoW Yggdrasil?
If not, it's derailing, let's focus on the actual topic at hand.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,636
Naa it's still vague. A realm that's connected to all space and time can also be represented as being beyond their influence, but it wouldn't exactly qualify for an infinitely bigger plane of existence
- 1,332
- 812
- Thread starter
- #190
This is so fake lol. Cory doesn't talk like that, and it's on Instagram, a platform cory hasn't used in over 3 years. Not to mention it blatantly contradicts what's presented and what he's said in actual interviews, which is the only God who ascended to a higher level of existence is Athena, and that's because she had a selfless death (Cory also said Athena's character arc is the most important arc in the series because her death allowed her to ascend to a higher dimension).
Last edited:
- 1,332
- 812
- Thread starter
- #191
Also, I fully agree with Darksmash's sentiments here regarding splitting hairs on endless and Infinite.
- 582
- 312
I won't derail, ill discuss that with you later
- 1,154
- 659
Darksmash's posts reflects my stance. Justifications aside, if the endless statement is accepted, I am for fully 2-A rather than the compromise. Endless and infinite are and always have been intechangeable here, so unless that standard is also applied to all infinity statements this would be 2-A straight up. It would be unfair otherwise, unless the same standard is applied to all infinity-related statements.
Which might actually make the wiki arguably more accurate I suppose - if it is applied to its entirety, but I digress.
Which might actually make the wiki arguably more accurate I suppose - if it is applied to its entirety, but I digress.
- 32,811
- 38,005
Well, I personally have no problems if outright 2-A is accepted. I also think that given enough context and/or used in a literal manner, endless can indeed qualify to be a synonym for infinite.
But I think Ultima was messaged about this so I think we should wait for what he has to say regarding this.
- 3,051
- 1,134
while I am fine with At least 2-B, likely 2-A, i am also more toward to "2-A".
- 165,217
- 72,200
Okay. No problem.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
