- 18,393
- 14,323
Dang, then this is not even a discussion lolThe only time Giselle ever identified as something was to save their skin/get cut for their blood to get spilled onto the people from squad 11.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dang, then this is not even a discussion lolThe only time Giselle ever identified as something was to save their skin/get cut for their blood to get spilled onto the people from squad 11.
That doesn’t make Giselle not female though. Since Giselle identifies as female. And she can be biologically male. So the statements can exist at the same time. You contradict Giselle though who says she’s a female and you contradict Kubo who also identifies her as a female.I never claimed Giselle was a female though. I'm just repeating what Kubo said and that's Giselle being a guy.
*Stares at the scan of Gisselle saying she’s a female along with Kubo supporting it.*Stares at all the scans supporting Giselle being a guy along with Kubo also stating it.
What is the issue since you seem to be hard disagreeing with Kubo here.
Giselle says she’s female so she’s female. Kubo identifies her as female. You’re the one saying Giselle says she’s male. Which you have no evidence for.You are though by saying Giselle is female when it's the opposite.
Nowhere did it say gender as many other points listed out. You just tried to say gender and sex mean the same thing.Post 91 and many others.
Yes, is there an issue.Dis you?
You changing to disagree or keeping on agree?Dang, then this is not even a discussion lol
I gave my alternative solution and I still agree. Gender identity and sex are not the same objectively.You changing to disagree or keeping on agree?
I'm not contradicting anything, I'm going off of what Kubo said.That doesn’t make Giselle not female though. Since Giselle identifies as female. And she can be biologically male. So the statements can exist at the same time. You contradict Giselle though who says she’s a female and you contradict Kubo who also identifies her as a female.
*Sips tea in male Giselle being correct*Stares at the scan of Gisselle saying she’s a female along with Kubo supporting it.
You are saying Giselle is female which is wrong. Giselle is a guy according to Kubo.What’s the problem since you seem to think there’s a contradiction here.
If you ignore evidence and repeat the same thing it doesn't make you right. You know that right?Giselle says she’s female so she’s female. Kubo identifies her as female. You’re the one saying Giselle says she’s male. Which you have no evidence for.
It does though.Nowhere did it say gender as many other points listed out. You just tried to say gender and sex mean the same thing.
Just find it funny how you were complaining about me malding/seething while accusing me of having an agenda.Yes, is there an issue.
Better things: actually vs debate lmaoYou forgot which site you're on, gramps.
IMAO, this is the best proof ever. Naw the CRT can't be closed. Sry lol
The amount of foocking times I've linked this is to damn high.IMAO, this is the best proof ever. Naw the CRT can't be closed. Sry lol
And yet being ignored More explicit and clearer than this can't be.The amount of foocking times I've linked this is to damn high.
Also that's an old one compared to this one. So it's like he's staying consistent about it.And yet being ignored More explicit and clearer than this can't be.
You’re contradicting both Giselle and Kubo. You haven’t addressed the argument. Simply ignored it.I'm not contradicting anything, I'm going off of what Kubo said.
*Sips tea in the primacy source of the manga and character saying she’s female
Giselle says she’s female which is true. Kubo identifies her as female which is true. And Kubo said she was male, which is true. You on the other hand have to ignore the first parts since they contradict the third part in your position.You are saying Giselle is female which is wrong. Giselle is a guy according to Kubo.
So maybe you should actually address the arguments at hand instead of ignoring them and simply repeating yourself hm? Projecting your arguments onto mine doesn’t work well.If you ignore evidence and repeat the same thing it doesn't make you right. You know that right?
Nope, nowhere does it say that.It does though.
How is an outside source better proof than the primary source and the character themselves?IMAO, this is the best proof ever. Naw the CRT can't be closed. Sry lol
And yet being ignored More explicit and clearer than this can't be.
…Jesus Christ. I made a mistake suggesting you to make this thread…
Anyway, this is cringe. It’s pretty clear that by “Man” they’re referring to biology (Whole context of that scene is how he could smell the cum off of Giselle). Giselle clearly identifies as a woman, she refers to herself as a woman and dislikes being called a man. This is not hard.
If I was in a position of that man, I would also say she is a girl, lmfao? This does not justify anything here.
Ok, but this does not really counter anything. Giselle is a man and identifies as a woman. Her gender identity is female, but her sex is male. Hard???Jesus Christ. I made a mistake suggesting you to make this thread…
Anyway, this is cringe. It’s pretty clear that by “Man” they’re referring to biology (Whole context of that scene is how he could smell the cum off of Giselle). Giselle clearly identifies as a woman, she refers to herself as a woman and dislikes being called a man. This is not hard.
What? She identifies herself to be a girl.If I was in a position of that man, I would also say she is a girl, lmfao? This does not justify anything here.
Imagine you are in the street and a guy is dressed like a woman/has long hair and all feminine body and everything, you would also call him a girl
Now this does not proof or justify anything
Yes, correct. Nobody is disputing this.Ok, but this does not really counter anything. Giselle is a man and identifies as a woman. Her gender identity is female, but her sex is male. Hard???
Holy BasedI gave my alternative solution and I still agree. Gender identity and sex are not the same objectively.
I can change my gender to female in papers, and yet I am still male biologically. Let's focus on reality and truth.
At the end of the day, if she died and scientists after 100 years saw her grave and want to see which gender it is, the science will say he is male regardless.
Feeling/preferring =/= reality and truth
Concession acceptedOk, but this does not really counter anything. Giselle is a man and identifies as a woman. Her gender identity is female, but her sex is male. Hard???
Are you against CRT or agree with it? I am confused.Yes, correct. Nobody is disputing this.
King is saying both her gender and sex is male. That’s what the CRT is about. Labeling Giselle with he/him pronouns for their gender on their profile. Hard???
mb, I thought that man called her an unarmed girl. Forget what I saidWhat? She identifies herself to be a girl.
I would call them a girl if they identify themselves as a girl.
That is proof and justification.
- Avoid using the phrase 'identifies as' or similarly worded phrases - simply use the word 'is'.
- Do not use the term 'preferred pronouns' as this implies that they are somehow not real or that they are optional to use. Simply use 'pronouns'.
- Use 'whose gender identity does not match the gender they/she/he were/was assigned at birth' (commonly abbreviated as AGAB) instead of 'born as the wrong sex / born in the wrong body'.
- Use 'assigned female/male at birth' (common short form 'AFAB' or 'AMAB') instead of 'biological woman/man' or 'biologically female/male'.
Disagree. Since the positions are not being applied correct. The position of this CRT is that both her gender and sex are male. So it is not correct.Are you against CRT or agree with it? I am confused.
Oh no, wait. I am against pronouns, that's why I prefer my alternative solution better.
As I said, male (but identify as female) will solve everything.
But your alternative solution is literally what we have on the wiki.mb, I thought that man called her an unarmed girl. Forget what I said
But again, my alternative solution is better lol
Wait, no. Then I am neutral rather than agreeing. Giving her gender and sex are male is just wrong according to the plot.Disagree. Since the positions are not being applied correct. The position of this CRT is that both her gender and sex are male. So it is not correct.
No, it is not objective anymore.So what we have currently right now is what will solve everything. Since Giselle’s gender is listed as being female on the wiki
I don't understand what you said.But your alternative solution is literally what we have on the wiki.
All the characters identify her as female even in the novel and Kubo himself has also identified her as female along with her herself identify as female. I’m confused on what you mean here.Wait, no. Then I am neutral rather than agreeing. Giving her gender and sex are male is just wrong according to the plot.
But may I see where she explicitly said her pronouns are she/her (not in dangerous situations because this can also be interpreted as a trap)
What? The wiki is based on the gender of the character. Giselle’s gender is female so the wiki puts her as female.No, it is not objective anymore.
See aboveI don't understand what you said.
We can’t reword it because those are FANDOM’s guidelines, not this site’s specifically.Wait, after I read the guidelines, we can't apply my alternative solution. Ups – this sucks, actually.
But actually, it can work if we reword it
Did she ever state she is a girl? (excluding dangerous situations)All the characters identify her as female even in the novel and Kubo himself has also identified her as female along with her herself identify as female. I’m confused on what you mean here.
What? The wiki is based on the gender of the character. Giselle’s gender is female so the wiki puts her as female.
See above
If the individual does not clearly state their pronouns, the following should be assumed:
- An individual who declares himself to be a transgender man should ultilize he/him. This is regardless of where he is in his transition.
- An individual who declares herself to be a transgender female should utilize she/her. This is regardless of where she is in her transition.
- Individuals who declare themselves to be gender non-binary should utilize they/them.
In fictional worlds, hints or allusions are sometimes used before a character is revealed to be transgender or non-binary. However, without a definitive statement of identification from the character, it is proper to defer to how the character is generally portrayed by others in the setting. For instance, if others refer to the character by using 'he/him' pronouns, until the character declares something that would contradict that, he should continue to be referred to as such.
We can use Pronouns, instead of identifying.If a character has never had a clear pronoun used to refer to them, and never stated their pronouns themselves, the default pronouns used should be "they" and "them" - this is natural English language for a person you don't know the gender of. E.g. "They first appeared in episode three of the second season."
Why would you ask me if she ever stated she was a girl but then say to not include the time she said she was a girl? I’m genuinely confused on what you’re saying here.Did she ever state she is a girl? (excluding dangerous situations)
Let me rephrase what I said. Did she ever state by herself “I am female, I want you to use with she/her”?Why would you ask me if she ever stated she was a girl but then say to not include the time she said she was a girl? I’m genuinely confused on what you’re saying here.
Yes she has stated “I am a girl.” It doesn’t matter if the situation was in dangerous since to interpret the statement differently would require to say she has lying about her own gender identity. Which there is literally nothing to indicate that was the case. She also gets quite clearly upset when people call her a man but never does so when she is constantly at every point referred to with female pronouns. And Giselle uses female phrases when talking about herself as well.Let me rephrase what I said. Did she ever state by herself “I am female, I want you to use with she/her”?
Did she ever correct someone when they refer to her as “he/him”?
Excluding any dangerous situations because they can be clearly interpreted differently.
If the CRT is wrong because he wants pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (male), then you are also wrong if you want pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (female).
At least accept this fact I stated.
It does matter which sitaution she said. Smth called "trap". My godYes she has stated “I am a girl.” It doesn’t matter if the situation was in dangerous since to interpret the statement differently would require to say she has lying about her own gender identity. Which there is literally nothing to indicate that was the case. She also gets quite clearly upset when people call her a man but never does so when she is constantly at every point referred to with female pronouns. And Giselle uses female phrases when talking about herself as well.
Im gonna say this next part as respectfully as I can because I find what you just very strange to me. You didn’t read anything I’ve posted. Literally none of that. You just assumed I had a position that was wrong but didn’t bother to check if that was actually true or not. At no point did I ever once say Giselle’s biological sex was female. And I especially didn’t say that just because her gender identity was female. Go back and reread the argument between me and King, I say the opposite countless times. It’s very strange to me that you just defaulted to a position I never once even hinted at holding.
So what fact do I need to accept.
If the CRT is wrong because he wants pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (male), then you are also wrong if you want pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (female).So what fact do I need to accept.
Can you prove she was lying? Because if not I invoke Occam’s razor.It does matter which sitaution she said. Smth called "trap". My god
Ah I see, you’re being intentionally disingenuous. I understand now.If the CRT is wrong because he wants pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (male), then you are also wrong if you want pronouns (gender identify) and sex to be equal (female).
You don't agree with this? Wow, double standards here.Ah I see, you’re being intentionally disingenuous. I understand now.
Yes, I can prove she is lying, simply because in Japan you are not allowed to kill an unarmed girl. And yes, she can simply say I am a girl in this situation to prevent getting killed. DangCan you prove she was lying? Because if not I invoke Occam’s razor.