- 10,095
- 3,770
I kinda agree. Characters can be wrong, but without in-universe stuff indicating that they were wrong, we usually shouldn't just assume they were....why are we arguing "they're ignorant" when it is the single source of info we have...? Sounds like bad arguments to me...
Because to assume a character is wrong means we just assumed the work lied & wasted time, effort & space by giving us false information. & if the information is false, then the ostensibly wrong claim is now pointless; Why would a work deliberately make a statement pointless, & even worse, make it seem important &/or true?
Not to mention, as said, it requires we have reason to believe that the character is an unreliable info source. Beyond their info being initially wrong because "Character 1 is unreliable because Statement 1 is unreliable because Character 1 is unreliable because Statement 1 is unreliable" seems like circular logic, at least.
Anyway, I was requested to input here. Would anyone be willing to summarize what the points of contention are, please?
It seems like currently, the argument seems to be regarding 1 or more of the following:
1. Are "SOUL power" & "Determination" 1 & the same? Are the terms interchangeable only some of the time? All of the time?
2. Does SOUL power correspond to AP? Or is the "power" it grants supernatural abilities, like controlling the timeline & coming back from death?
3. How much SOUL power/Determination should a human be assumed to have?
Are there topics to the current debate I failed to list? Have I correctly assessed the current topics of debate?