its neither
william isnt in hell, nor is he in a coma, hes dead (bro is dead) and toysnhk is preventing him from passing on to the afterlife
omc saying "leave the demon to his demons" implies william actually will go to hell if toysnhk lets him leave, meaning he is dead (not in a coma) and is not in literal hell
I don't think you get the plot of The Man In Room 1280, Afton is stuck in a coma because he is being kept alive by Andrew during this state, if Andrew lets go he will pass on because it's blatantly shown and stated by him that Afton is still remaining active due to his presence being attached to Afton. so yes he is dead but alive because Andrew isn't letting him go. so your example does not disprove the fact that he'd still be in a coma in the real world.
I didn't say it was proof, I said it was evidence. There is a difference between the two.
Yes, you have previously responded to these points, but "nuh-uh" isn't evidence. For instance:
This point right here is that "the Hell stuff is allegorical because it is. The books call it a playground of evil, so it's allegorical and both souls are fighting in the mind-scape-pocket-dimension-spirit-realm-memory-space area."
That is not evidence, that is speculation. And ALL of your points have been the same empty nonsense.
What is the evidence that Afton's soul and TOYSNHK are fighting in the whatever-the-*-is-it-now IN THE GAMES? I don't give a flying * about the novels and Fazbear Frights, where is the evidence IN THE GAMES? The books are meant to tell a separate story while also filling in some gaps from the games, they aren't one-to-one in every aspect.
Prove it. Prove that the memory-scape-spirit-world exists in the games. Saying "it does because it could" doesn't count as proof, hell, it isn't even evidence; it's speculation at best.
What lore detail does the Faz-Goo help explain? Please, I'm dying to know. The Fazbear Frights are their own independant stories that help to provide more evidence for some stuff from the games, but they're still different stories. It's exactly like how the novels explained who Henry and William were but went in a different direction to the games in terms of their stories.
Afton doesn't get tracked down by a detective traveling through time with a ball-pit and get screeched at by the Puppet's mask in the games, so they clearly DO have different actions taken.
Yes, Afton got burned in the books too. No, not literally everything about the situations is identical. If the corpse in Burntrap is any indication, Afton clearly doesn't explode in the games. The Puppet's mask also isn't salvaged out of the wreckage in the games because it's on the Tangle. Also, the Stitchwraith stories are not separate from the Frights stories, period.
The Tales books are fine because those are obviously intended to be in the same continuity.
I fully support this. It makes the most sense out of anything we've suggested and it's narratively satisfying. It also explains why Afton is completely gone post-UCN.
1. My bad on the first part but your ''Evidance'' is far from concrete and i've already countered it, it's a bland statement that can be taken to any route and can be shaped in anyway.
2. I've never just said ''Nuh-uh'' i've shown that your ''evidance'' specifically the hell point alongside the OMC pond point can be shaped in any way or any form towards and point that is being made. so yeah you're just numbing down what i'd been claiming.
3. Lmfao once again you're not reading my points, what i claimed with that example was that these mind-scapes were interactable and enterable for spirits as if they were pyshical planes, your statements about books telling a different story while filling gaps is literally made for The Novel trilogy and the Frights books are explictly shown to be completely different than the Novels;
Scott stating that Frights are different;
Scott stating that filling holes from the past are for the novels.
'' All I can do is say that some questions will be answered; even if it may not always be the answer you wanted. Be patient. Let me at least say this; future games will look forward; but look to the novels to fill in some of blanks to the past!''
''Over the next few years there are a lot of projects planned, and most are very story driven. Lots of the later stories will answer some of the biggest questions from the fan base over this past year, in my opinion.''
''To answer your question, yes, I'm referring to the new Fazbear Frights series!
''
those were about Frights, and this is the seperate statements for the novels also in the same post
''All I can do is say that some questions will be answered; even if it may not always be the answer you wanted. Be patient. Let me at least say this; future games will look forward; but look to the novels to fill in some of blanks to the past!''
and this is the Frights explanation both in Scotts post
''This will be very different from the original book series, as it will be a collection of short horror stories that takes place in the FNAF universe.''
You can blatantly see what context Scott is reffering to ''FNAF universe'' as
4- It exists in the games because it takes place in the games? not only that but the series is meant to just awnser the biggest questions and show us the concepts first introduced but not fully explained
5- Once again funnily you aren't talking about the scans that outright prove that it's just a continuation of the games's story/timeline. It literally says ''
The incident shown in Pizzeria Simulator and its aftermath are revisited by police evidance... It seems that Casette Mans plans did not go as intended'' it literally says that we saw the event before in said game and later on we're confirmed that it did not work as intended through this epilouge which is connected to a larger meta-story seperate from the other one-off stories. Look at point 3 for extra proof on that.
Which speaking of, Faz-Goo story isn't a part of the Stitchline lmao, so your point is directly wrong from the start, im only talking about Stitchline stories whom are called out to be a continuation.
6- I've to repeat my previous word i guess. Once again you're not reading the scans nor my responses it says that this is
POST the incident we see in FFPS and due to TMIR1280
POST the events of Ultimate Custom Night, so the Stingers just take place after THE GAMES so these events being not shown in the games dosen't prove that they did not happen in the same timeline, thats what Frights is for the explain the continuation of this timeline first intorduced in the games. So yes the detective did chase after the Wraith and encounter the famous serial killer Afton. after the video-games took off.
7. One Burntraps corpse isn't stated to be Aftons, second its blatantly shown in Frights that the corpse could be reanimated hence Afton literally growing bone ears and such and long with extra flesh oh yea extra thing Afton from this epilouge was meant to initally be in the Ruin DLC replacing the MXES system. First of all The Stingers took place post FFPS and pre-AR/HW meaning that there is a huge ass timeframe inbetween for them to take the mask to the building. btw the Puppets mask was ontop of the Aftons Amalgamation which was right near the dock so yes Puppet was very visible and was directly ontop of the giant trash rabbit corpse, i don't see why Faz-Ent couldn't just take that in. oh yeah not only that but the Marionette mask on the Tangle directly matches the description of the one in Fazbear Frights ''The last thing Larson had put in this bag was a mask. The mask was cracked and muddied'' with features mostly highlighted
8. Exactly, its defo same continuity atleast the wiki can agree with that.