- 12,440
- 4,573
Well, let's take a read on the profile then:I got a better suggestion for you.
Read. The. Whole. Damn. Profile
Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2, Creation and Destruction. Heavily implied in the original series but outright confirmed in the Wraith Arc)
As for now, even a Type 3 concept can be justified with such phrase.
Multiverse level+ (Destroyed the concept of witches in every universe before ascending to a higher level of existence to become a conceptual entity. Her multiverse was later confirmed to contain infinite universes in Puella Magi Homura Tamura. The Law of Cycles encompasses the infinite multiverse as well as the nonexistent multiverse beyond it. Has shown to be on par with Ultimate Kriemhild Gretchen)
How does that alone imply Type 2?
Conceptual Manipulation: As Ultimate Madoka, she has been shown to be capable of destroying the concept of a witch and creating the concept of a Wraith on a multiversal+ scale for all timelines, past and future included.
Already better, but the fact that is in an obscure place makes it iffy.
Goddess Madoka had the power that allowed her to rewrite the concepts in all universes. Rewriting concepts (even if it seems insignificant) affects all of space.
Then she (through some paradox) destroyed her own future dark form. After that there was a complete reset of the causality of the world (as if former concepts and all related events never existed). Madoka herself became a conceptual entity (which means that it will take at least same level of power to destroy or rewrite the concept of Madoka).
Well, better yeah, but was that hard to put it in the P&A section?
Maybe wording better the last note, plus adding a "[see notes]" in her Type 2 CM justification is already enough.
And is not the 1st time, since a similar case happenened.