- 18,393
- 14,323
I am willing to assist with adding any commonly recognized feats to the page, if any assistance is needed.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Expanding the References for Common Feats page
- Thread starter Omnificence
- Start date
- 168,532
- 77,300
Thank you for helping out. It seems like a good type of feat to add to our standard feats page, but KLOL506 seemed to have some concerns that you will likely have to modify your calculation blog to accommodate.
- 5,169
- 3,064
I was on my own for this one, so here's what it takes to crush an entire person: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Flashlight237/Common_Feat:_Crushing_a_Human
- 168,532
- 77,300
Thank you for helping out.
@KLOL506 @Jasonsith @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Mr._Bambu @Therefir
Are any of you willing to help out with evaluating this please?
- 2,401
- 1,548
- Thread starter
- #845
I still need input on how to correct this one calculation I made.
- 5,169
- 3,064
I looked at the blog and the comments and yeah, it's hard to verify anything here due to it being stopped by a great unknown (nobody studied actually running up a wall).
- 2,401
- 1,548
- Thread starter
- #847
Also have another one dealing with Mach cones.
- 168,532
- 77,300
It seems like this has been accepted and can be added to our standard feats page now.
@Therefir
We are waiting for you to evaluate this calculation blog again.
- 168,532
- 77,300
Turn all of the separate feats/sections in the following page collapsible, if I haven't misunderstood.
References for Common Feats
Throughout fiction and real life, there have been numerous feats demonstrating a certain character's or object's destructive power. This page's purpose is to consolidate calculations for those feats for better convenience in determining an object's or character's Attack Potency or Durability...vsbattles.fandom.com
@Dereck03 @Just_a_Random_Butler
Did either of you ever find the time to handle this?
- 168,532
- 77,300
- 2,033
- 3,263
Thank you for reminding me.
- 13,816
- 15,014
Hold it... Is the author of the blog essentially redefining the destruction values of different materials?
- 32,835
- 38,111
Ummmmmm... no? He is still using the same methods to derive the destruction values.
It's just that drywall and brick have some pitifully low values.
Concrete however, we already have our own values in the Table of Destruction Values chart. That is what should be used.
Last edited:
- 8,447
- 8,908
Because of this thread, I think I've found a flaw in the wording with one of our feats involving catching fire through sheer speed alone with this calc in question. Because if it's true what DT has pointed out earlier around this thread, then this shouldn't be required to necessarily have clothes just to leave a trail of flames through sheer speed alone.
- 17,607
- 27,572
I lost notifications for this thread for a while, that was weird
- 168,532
- 77,300
If you bookmark the following page, your subscribed threads shown in bold text are the ones that have new replies.
- 8,447
- 8,908
Bump, about this
- 5,169
- 3,064
So, here I am looking over the common feat of vaporizing iron and...
E=m*c*ΔT, where m=mass, c=specific heat capacity, ΔT=change in temperature. Iron's boiling point is not 6088 degrees celsius, it's 2862 degrees celsius!
It would actually go like this for a cubic centimeter of iron.:
7.874*0.44946*(2862-20)=10057.97453
Yes, I used five sig-figs; that's what the figures presented beforehand gave us.
At least you guys got latent heat right.
There's something fishy here and I can't put a finger on it. Well...
First of all, that's not how density works! Moles don't have anything to do with volume!
Second of all, that's not how the specific heat capacity equation works! It goes like this:
E=m*c*ΔT, where m=mass, c=specific heat capacity, ΔT=change in temperature. Iron's boiling point is not 6088 degrees celsius, it's 2862 degrees celsius!
It would actually go like this for a cubic centimeter of iron.:
7.874*0.44946*(2862-20)=10057.97453
Yes, I used five sig-figs; that's what the figures presented beforehand gave us.
At least you guys got latent heat right.
- 2,401
- 1,548
- Thread starter
- #862
So, what do you suggest I add to that calculation I made? Do you want me to keep the high-end?
- 8,447
- 8,908
I'm currently waiting for what the other mods think
- 2,401
- 1,548
- Thread starter
- #864
Hod that thought for now; I just found a video from The Theorizer on this, and the result was a bit higher than the one I got.
Did he do the math right here?
Did he do the math right here?
- 17,607
- 27,572
Yeah that needs a recalc for sure
Would you like me to ping some people for this?
- 5,169
- 3,064
Ah, don't worry about it. I'll get to fixing it when I get my Among Us calc finished up.
- 17,607
- 27,572
Oh you're doing more than what's posted, Ik I evaluated one already
- 5,169
- 3,064
Yeah. It's that Right Hand Man feat Psychomaster35 tried doing. I took that into my own hands.
- 18,393
- 14,323
@Dalesean027 Do you need any help regarding applying the calculations (accepted) in the page?
- 17,607
- 27,572
Yeah i'm not home i'm literally on my way to Canada right now so I can't do that atm
- 18,393
- 14,323
Mind giving me instructions and the pages that I should add them? In which sections?
- 17,607
- 27,572
Seems its already been handled actually everything now needs other CGM opinions
- 18,393
- 14,323
Alright! I will still follow this thread, in case anyone wants to add anything and need my assistance! You can mention me in a post whenever you want, but most likely I will not check vsbw till next week.
- 2,033
- 3,263
I kindly request that you inform me of the specific changes that you have made, if any. I am currently working on updating the formatting of the entire page.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Here is a post where I explicitly mentioned every action I made in the page, including adding logs
- 2,033
- 3,263
Thanks.
- 168,532
- 77,300
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Antoniofer @AlexSoloVaAlFuturo @Ugarik
Would any of you be willing to evaluate if we need to revise our explanation pages based on the following post?
Also, Antoniofer, Alex, and Ugarik, you are always welcome back as calc group members if you have the time.
Would any of you be willing to evaluate if we need to revise our explanation pages based on the following post?
Also, Antoniofer, Alex, and Ugarik, you are always welcome back as calc group members if you have the time.
- 1,178
- 407
Using values above:
55.845 amu / 7.874 g/cm^3 = 7.09 mol/cm^3
425144 * 7.09 = 3,014,270 J/cm^3
The calc mentioned by Flashlight237 was indeed invalid
- Density: 7.874 g/cm^3
- Boiling point: 2862 °C
- Heat of fusion: 13,810 J/mol
- Heat of vaporization: 340,000 J/mol
- Molar Heat Capacity 25.10 J/(mol*K)
- Molar Mass: 55.8450 g/mol
55.845 amu / 7.874 g/cm^3 = 7.09 mol/cm^3
425144 * 7.09 = 3,014,270 J/cm^3
The calc mentioned by Flashlight237 was indeed invalid
- 1,178
- 407
No, first of all he ignored heat transfer rate and heat radiation. Those are two most important parts. Second, avg cross sectional area of human body is 0.67 m^2 not 1.67.
Similar threads
