• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Expanding the References for Common Feats page

f73c89bbf0c91381ac946d90bad518ac.png

I would put it above Falling from Great Heights as a new section.
 
My apologies for any previous misunderstanding.
Someone else has decided to handle this, then?
My to-do list has gotten quite long.
 
Alright, here is what I did (you can call this a report of my actions)
  • I add it under impact feats (precisely under “if slammed into a wall category”) and formatted it as sub heading 1
  • I changed the description of the introduction to formal language.
  • In order to improve readability for both new visitors and existing members, I have made several stylistic changes to the formatting. These changes are intended to enhance the overall clarity and accessibility of the information presented.
  • I changed descriptions of Japan and US to fit the formal writing style of the page
Unless there are any concerns with my actions, feel free to comment down. I am unsure yet if I placed in a correct category. I will change its place, if someone gives me the answer for that.

History of my actions are here:
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot for helping out, Dread. 🙏🙏🙏🙂🙂🙂

And thank you to you as well, JaRB and Dalesean027. 🙏🙏🙏
FinePoint said:
My apologies for any previous misunderstanding.
Someone else has decided to handle this, then?
My to-do list has gotten quite long.
Click to expand...
I do not remember anybody else volunteering for reorganising the structure of the entire page so it turns considerably easier to navigate.
 
In my opinion, the current page would be more easily navigable if it were divided into four separate pages:
  1. Impact Feats through Potential Energy/Lifting Feats
  2. Object Destruction Feats
  3. Star Feats through Speed Feats
  4. Miscellaneous Feats
In addition to this structural change, it may also be beneficial to improve the formatting of the page to increase its overall clarity and aesthetic appeal. As it stands, the page is quite lengthy and may be overwhelming to scroll through. These suggestions are intended to enhance the usability of the page for readers and our members.
 
ImmortalDread said:
In my opinion, the current page would be more easily navigable if it were divided into four separate pages:
  1. Impact Feats through Potential Energy/Lifting Feats
  2. Object Destruction Feats
  3. Star Feats through Speed Feats
  4. Miscellaneous Feats
In addition to this structural change, it may also be beneficial to improve the formatting of the page to increase its overall clarity and aesthetic appeal. As it stands, the page is quite lengthy and may be overwhelming to scroll through. These suggestions are intended to enhance the usability of the page for readers and our members.
Click to expand...
I think it looks better with the way it looks, cause the feats are easier to find when it's still in this formula
 
What do the other staff and knowledgeable members here think about Dread's latest suggestion here?
 
Before anything, I think the biggest improvement would just be modifying it to always use correct significant figures.

The excess of digits isn't only scientifically improper, but makes the page much harder to read and easily comprehend.

Having each calculation be collapsible somehow would also be a massive improvement.
 
FinePoint said:
Before anything, I think the biggest improvement would just be modifying it to always use correct significant figures.

The excess of digits isn't only scientifically improper, but makes the page much harder to read and easily comprehend.

Having each calculation be collapsible somehow would also be a massive improvement.
Click to expand...
I would say that the final tally is where the rounding should and must be performed (it is just me).

But having each calculation being able to collapse will be a good start and will be good for navigation too.
 
I still disagree with separating the categories from the main RFCF page into different other separate pages, as it makes them even more annoying and harder to find.
 
Jasonsith said:
I would say that the final tally is where the rounding should and must be performed (it is just me).

But having each calculation being able to collapse will be a good start and will be good for navigation too.
Click to expand...
It can be proper practice to carry the significant digits through each sub-calculation, based on the lowest accuracy you have each time.

So, if you start with three pieces of knowledge: 35 feet wide, 394.293 feet tall, 295.238 feet deep.
Then, you get area: 35*394.293*295.238 = 4074359.68569sqft
However, with proper significant digits, your answer is 4,100,000 sqft.
If you want to use this calculation for another calculation, such as getting mass from density, you could use the 4,100,000sqft number in that calculation, since your initial margin for error can be included in the new calculation.

While there is debate in the scientific community over this, I tend to be on the side of less being more, since overgeneralizing for errors is more honest than undergeneralizing, especially given what we do is already highly speculative.
That said, I think rounding the final answer, at least, should be standard at the bare minimum. The massive long numbers with many decimal places are hard to read, and the specificity is also meaningless when we're making massive speculations regardless.
 
Last edited:
I also think that collapsible calculation sections seems like a good idea, but it would likely take quite a bit of effort to apply properly.
 
Antvasima said:
I also think that collapsible calculation sections seems like a good idea, but it would likely take quite a bit of effort to apply properly.
Click to expand...
If nothing else we should at least try to make the calculations into a table, as was the original plan. It would make life a lot easier.

Of course, I suck at making tables so uh...
 
I much prefer if the sections turn collapsible.
 
Antvasima said:
I much prefer if the sections turn collapsible.
Click to expand...
I have no issue with it, I was just saying that if the collapsible sections aren't possible we should at the very least make them into a table. Jasonsith had plans for it for a long time but then IRL problems caught him off-guard and well, here we are.
 
Turn all of the separate feats/sections in the following page collapsible, if I haven't misunderstood.

vsbattles.fandom.com

References for Common Feats

Throughout fiction and real life, there have been numerous feats demonstrating a certain character's or object's destructive power. This page's purpose is to consolidate calculations for those feats for better convenience in determining an object's or character's Attack Potency or Durability...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Antvasima said:
I also think that collapsible calculation sections seems like a good idea, but it would likely take quite a bit of effort to apply properly.
Click to expand...
Dereck03 said:
What do you want me to do exactly?
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Turn all of the separate feats/sections in the following page collapsible, if I haven't misunderstood.

vsbattles.fandom.com

References for Common Feats

Throughout fiction and real life, there have been numerous feats demonstrating a certain character's or object's destructive power. This page's purpose is to consolidate calculations for those feats for better convenience in determining an object's or character's Attack Potency or Durability...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
@Shadowbokunohero @Crazylatin77 @Jvando @Zaratthustra @Just_a_Random_Butler @ElixirBlue @Tllmbrg @Nehz_XZX @Dereck03
 
I think that seems generic enough to qualify.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
References for Common Feats Re-organization
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Flashlight237
Common Feat Fix: Throwing Someone into the Horizon
Replies
4
Views
1K
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Fallen_Angelicx
  • Locked
About Crushing Skulls
Replies
10
Views
3K
KingTempest
KingTempest
MaybeWantsToEdit
Can this calc be used?
Replies
6
Views
2K
KLOL506
KLOL506
GoldenScorpions
Freezing the Earth question
Replies
2
Views
1K
GoldenScorpions
GoldenScorpions
Back
Top