- 2,401
- 1,548
- Thread starter
- #921
Just happened to come across this calculation. Can we also add it to the page?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course. Let's get some more evaluations for it.I personally do not mind, but would appreciate further input in this regard first.
Pretty sure the first link you posted already has some of those calcs listedI also came across a few more interesting destruction calculations; let's get them evaluated and added.
I did one of the door feats myself: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...n_Feat:_Pounding_a_Closed_or_Locked_Door_OpenLet's see if we can get the rest of these feats added as well.
Yeah, let's get some evaluations for this, too.I did one of the door feats myself: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...n_Feat:_Pounding_a_Closed_or_Locked_Door_Open
@Psychomaster35 @KLOL506 @Dalesean027 @JasonsithCan somebody list links to all of the accepted and seemingly useful calculations that have been suggested to be added quite recently here, please? So I can then ask DontTalkDT to evaluate if they seem good to add.
This seems interesting. How thick of a rope are we talking here?What about breaking rope? This is one of those feats that we generally use outside sources for (like the skull crushing feat for example): https://www.boatsafe.com/rope-breaking-strength/
I should probably point out that a coil of rope is usually made of three strands, so take it for what you will.
Seems you're to calculate that yourself from this portion of it as seen below:This seems interesting. How thick of a rope are we talking here?
What would the units for circumference be here?Seems you're to calculate that yourself from this portion of it as seen below:
(900 lbs. X circumference 2 = breaking strength)
As an example, if you had a piece of ½” manila line and wanted to find the breaking strength, you would first calculate the circumference. (.5 X 3.14 = 1.57) Then using the formula above:
1.57 2 X 900 = 2,218 pounds of breaking strength
In this specifc example that's a half inch of manila line as the 0.5 value in the calcWhat would the units for circumference be here?
Can somebody list links to all of the accepted and seemingly useful calculations that have been suggested to be added quite recently here, please? So I can then ask DontTalkDT to evaluate if they seem good to add.
This could be useful
Inches.What would the units for circumference be here?
I would still greatly appreciate if somebody here is willing to help out with this.Can somebody list links to all of the accepted and seemingly useful calculations that have been suggested to be added quite recently here, please? So I can then ask DontTalkDT to evaluate if they seem good to add.
One common occurrence is getting a toaster bath. A field test by the Mythbusters puts a toaster bath at 12 milliamps (0.012 Coulombs per second):
Based on what I could tell, a volt is a joule per coulomb: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampere
Which is basically this: kg*m²*s^-3*A^-1
kg=kilograms
m=meters
s=seconds
A=amperes
Based on 1.8 m² for the surface area of an average man and 62 kg for the average human, I got 9300 volts out of it. At the same time, at 12 milliamps, I got 111.6 watts, or 111.6 joules per second. It's a pretty barebones Athlete level deal through AP alone.
My thoughts exactly. How the **** can electricity be deadly and utter weaksauce at the same time?LMAO what the ****
Actually, that's not the reason why. Actual reason is, majority of the electricity doesn't go through the body at all because of grounding coming into play, and some other external factors like travelling through mediums like air and water.Probably cause it ignores dura
More like, why would anyone consider something this ******-up eligible for common feats? Just... too dark.My thoughts exactly. How the **** can electricity be deadly and utter weaksauce at the same time?
Considering we have skull crushing and crushing a person whole as a common feat and we have flipping Berserk on this wiki... Lmao.More like, why would anyone consider something this ******-up eligible for common feats? Just... too dark.
Yes... well... game-ending yourself is considered a tad bit darker than the above on Fandom. IDK why but I'd still suggest caution.Considering we have skull crushing and crushing a person whole as a common feat and we have flipping Berserk on this wiki... Lmao.
Okay but when did Chucky use a toaster (yes, he used one in the movies) to do that to himself?Yes... well... game-ending yourself is considered a tad bit darker than the above on Fandom. IDK why but I'd still suggest caution.
Can somebody list links to all of the accepted and seemingly useful calculations that have been suggested to be added quite recently here, please? So I can then ask DontTalkDT to evaluate if they seem good to add.
Anyone? We need to do this in order to get some productive work done here.I would still greatly appreciate if somebody here is willing to help out with this.
Can we get some input on this?I still got this feat on doors waiting for evaluation: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...n_Feat:_Pounding_a_Closed_or_Locked_Door_Open
Any help?
Can somebody list links to all of the accepted and seemingly useful calculations that have been suggested to be added quite recently here, please? So I can then ask DontTalkDT to evaluate if they seem good to add.
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Mr._Bambu @Therefir @DMUA @Damage3245 @DemonGodMitchAubin @Jasonsith @Wokistan @Armorchompy @Migue79 @Psychomaster35 @CloverDragon03 @KLOL506 @M3X_2.0 @Dark-Carioca @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Aguywhodoesthings @Dalesean027 @DemiiPowa @Flashlight237I would still greatly appreciate if somebody here is willing to help out with this.
I do not remember so well.What was the last feat added?
Just a Random Butler/Ref1
vsbattles.fandom.com
This is the appearance the page will take once sections have been transformed into collapsible content. My goal was to make individual feats collapsible to avoid excessive page length.
However, I have a concern about the level 2 heading section named "Attacking a Person such that The Person Flew across a Distance before falling onto the Ground." It looks really weird as a collapsible content. Perhaps it would fit better as a level 3 heading and, if that's the case, under which level 2 heading should it be categorized under, perhaps "Miscellaneous Feats"?
Thank you extremely much for the help.
However, wouldn't it be much better if all of the sections are automatically collapsed until somebody clicks on them?
That seems like a very badly worded and overly long title. Does anybody here have better suggestions to replace it with please?
I am suggesting, this: “Throwing someone to the ground”.
Also, I know this one's old but this particular feat ought to be classified under a specific category of feats. For instance, if a feat of "Destroying/Creating a forest" is grouped under the category of "Forest Feats," then the "Hurling somebody... .." feat should also be assigned to a relevant feat category instead of being a standalone feat. Or is it just me? [Refer to the text with the red underline].The old title is extremely long and specific, this can be added in the description.
But here are my alternatives:
- Knocking a person back a distance before they fall to the ground.
- Hurling a person through the air before they hit the ground.
- Propelling a person across a distance before they land on the ground.
- Launching a person into the air before they crash to the ground.
- Throwing a person some distance before they drop to the ground.
- Catapulting a person before they plummet to the ground.
So it's been a bit.Also, I know this one's old but this particular feat ought to be classified under a specific category of feats. For instance, if a feat of "Destroying/Creating a forest" is grouped under the category of "Forest Feats," then the "Hurling somebody... .." feat should also be assigned to a relevant feat category instead of being a standalone feat. Or is it just me? [Refer to the text with the red underline].