- 2,938
- 365
Boss, the definition on the AP page literally has the word Hypothetically on it. Just give it to me.
"Possibly
Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should also be indeterminate."
Not to mention it seems that giving out a possibly is even allowed when there's "less viable power scaling". With its probability being "indeterminate"? I feel like I know what that means, but maybe i'm stupid.
Doesn't that sentence as a whole mean that it doesn't matter how likely the hypothetical situation is, so long as it is a real possibility and not some headcanon, obviously?
Sounds like this situation. I'mma be unfiltered, this sounds like bias. Like, I don't believe it's on purpose, nor with malice or hate against Dragon Ball, because honestly, I think people are just afraid of being called out for listing a character high with no concrete feats, despite the reasoning being logical for it being logical. I think this is just a knee jerk reaction. But how can people not see how obvious these criterion fit this situation?
"Possibly
Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should also be indeterminate."
Not to mention it seems that giving out a possibly is even allowed when there's "less viable power scaling". With its probability being "indeterminate"? I feel like I know what that means, but maybe i'm stupid.
Doesn't that sentence as a whole mean that it doesn't matter how likely the hypothetical situation is, so long as it is a real possibility and not some headcanon, obviously?
Sounds like this situation. I'mma be unfiltered, this sounds like bias. Like, I don't believe it's on purpose, nor with malice or hate against Dragon Ball, because honestly, I think people are just afraid of being called out for listing a character high with no concrete feats, despite the reasoning being logical for it being logical. I think this is just a knee jerk reaction. But how can people not see how obvious these criterion fit this situation?