- 1,665
- 1,294
Exactly, basically the ranges covered by the kaioken
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball AP, sad downgrade (Raditz/Saiyan/Namek Saga Tiers only)
- Thread starter Ednaxel2
- Start date
- Status
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #162
to get rid of hypothetical multipliers, sorry if I'm not active here I already said in the db discussion thread that I won't have as much time for CRTs for now
- 24
- 18
bump?
- 12,125
- 4,364
Bump
- 12,125
- 4,364
bump
- 110
- 155
Bump
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #169
ikr, anyways bumpWhy must these threads get stonewalled
DivineAura44
He/Him- 5,288
- 3,428
What exactly are you waiting for? More staff approval?
- 12,125
- 4,364
can someone count the staff votes?
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #174
Yes I don't think we have 3 yet, its been a while tho so I could be wrong
Would be helpful
- 12,125
- 4,364
@Maverick_Zero_X here agrees completely
@Damage3245 here agrees with removing downscaling, but prefers to use the baseline Earth destruction rather than the calc in the OP
@DarkDragonMedeus here agrees with some of the problems, but didn't gave a straight vote so far
@KingTempest didn't gave a concrete vote or thoughts about the OP specifically, he seems to be against using PL linearly tho, but i would suggest asking him again and not assume anything about his position
ask for either DarkDragon or Kingtempest to give their opinions again and we can solve this i say, as for the calculation of the Avarege DB planet in the OP, maybe a new thread would be better to cover that one given the size that this thread already has
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #176
Could you two please give a concrete vote on the OP?
- 31,459
- 34,319
I think the calculation in the OP seems fine to use.
- 1,665
- 1,294
I think the main issue here is the Kaioken scaling
- 12,125
- 4,364
do you also agree with the main premise of removing the downscaling?
- 31,459
- 34,319
Yeah, the examples in the OP yeah.
- 12,125
- 4,364
and now we have 3 agreements, this can be applied
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #182
That was already accepted in a thread before, no point in making another one for it
No only two from DDM and Maverick. Damage disagrees with using the average Planet calc (which is already accepted??) and King still hasn't given a concrete vote
- 12,125
- 4,364
was it? which thread? as far as i can remember, it wasn't
Damage also agreed with not downsaling, so that part was accepted
- 21,469
- 30,790
I'm fine with the average planet calc. I disagree with the downscaling
- 13,228
- 21,044
The new scaling is fine, including using the GBE calc
The_Yellow_Topaz
She/Her- 1,477
- 1,512
Btw, CGM votes count for the calculation part, so it's irrefutably approved, and can be applied.
- 12,125
- 4,364
for the math itself, i assume the statement part not considering what i heard in the past regarding this
it is approved regardless tho, so that matters little
- 6,900
- 1,321
What's the current state of this thread?
- 12,125
- 4,364
it is accepted
- 6,900
- 1,321
Looking at the scaling chain, and with Kaio-Ken x2, isn't it technically a 4 times multiplier?
- 13,228
- 21,044
What about this makes Kaioken x2 a 4x multiplier...?
- 12,125
- 4,364
.......you know, bringing a proposal entirely new, to a thread literally at its end feels..........weird, just make a new thread for it
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #193
"Not even doubling his strength through Kaio-ken was enough"??
- 12,125
- 4,364
what makes 2x Kaioken a 4x multiplier?
- 3,303
- 2,117
- Thread starter
- #195
idk ask him, the scan he's using literally says it doubles his strength
DivineAura44
He/Him- 5,288
- 3,428
Assumption but this confusion probably stems from the fact that Kaioken and Kaioken x2 have the same multiplier.
- 6,900
- 1,321
Base Kaio-ken is already a 2x multiplier, so wouldn't a Kaio-ken x2 be a 4x multiplier?
- 13,228
- 21,044
Base Kaioken and Kaioken x2 are the same
- 1,665
- 1,294
So just to be clear
This thread is still going with the kaioken x10 Goku not having a power level of 900k from a base of 90k?
This thread is still going with the kaioken x10 Goku not having a power level of 900k from a base of 90k?
- 6,900
- 1,321
How are you sure about that? If they were the same then how come Goku didn't just say "Kaio-ken" over "Kaio-ken x2" after using base Kaio-ken?
- Status
