- 11,481
- 4,139
what is the reason again?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
I don’t have the time to argue against the Goku avi hit squad for 100 pages
- 11,726
- 5,929
Wow, i wanted an X1 with you
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
X1?Wow, i wanted an X1 with you
- 6,395
- 6,079
A slang for 1 VS 1
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
Luffy hasn’t X1’d anyone on this site in any CRT
- 11,726
- 5,929
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
You create the CRT and I’ll post it
- 3,468
- 5,101
Sure, the statements after explicitly say that they have the power to destroy the Universe itself. Along with the condensed energy ball having the same statements, and the guides which say the same thing. What am I ignoring? A Void literally is nothingness, and we literally see voids in Super, which again have no time and space.
I’m not denying the fact that there are no statements that mention time itself, but that doesn’t mean the statements made it explicitly cap at its material. Especially taking in the fact that it crossed multiple time-spaces.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
The definition of void is empty spaceSure, the statements after explicitly say that they have the power to destroy the Universe itself. Along with the condensed energy ball having the same statements, and the guides which say the same thing. What am I ignoring? A Void literally is nothingness, and we literally see voids in Super, which again have no time and space.
I’m not denying the fact that there are no statements that mention time itself, but that doesn’t mean the statements made it explicitly cap at its material. Especially taking in the fact that it crossed multiple time-spaces.
It’s kinda ironic how you called me arrogant for saying that, but it’s whatever. People like to throw ad hominems when someone tells them why they’re wrong.
- 11,726
- 5,929
I know you can do it, try your best.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
I’m preoccupied with life, but if you want to X1 so bad write the CRT yourself in a blog and send it to me.
I’ll happily post it and defend it.
- 192
- 385
Aaaah no, since you affect a whole space-time construction, you inherently affect past, present and future times, so a there is no need of a direct mention. Thats explained in the last tier 2 revision.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
3-A and low 2-C same tier when?
- 11,726
- 5,929
- 192
- 385
Are you sure? Old Kai mentions that the whole universe will be destroyed. And with "whole universe" it refers to the total construction of the universe 7 which is 2-C, so the destruction of this structure is a 2-C feat, so I have explained above.
This wiki deals with the universe as all of space-time, so destroying the entire universe, in this case, is equivalent to destroying all of its space-time, hence past, present and future times.
- 192
- 385
3-A: destroy all the matter or physical content of the universe.
Low 2-C: destroy the entire universe, including its space-time and all its matter.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
So any sufficiently vague universal statement is low 2-C
- 192
- 385
That’s a great straw man fallacy…
- 192
- 385
Ah, my guy needs to improve his reading skills
- 12,330
- 2,321
Fixed
- 11,726
- 5,929
I agree
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
Literally the entire 2-C BoG argument is based on ignoring the direct statements given by Elder Kai and ignoring context. I find it ironic you made such a statement.
- 11,726
- 5,929
Instead of complaining, wouldn't it be better to create a crt?
- 11,481
- 4,139
Man, the attitude of both sides here is so petty omg lol
- 12,330
- 2,321
He already explained why he wouldn't
- 11,726
- 5,929
I'm really seeing, if anyone has any problem about BoG 2-C just do a downgrade, this is so easy to solve.
- 12,330
- 2,321
Lol at it being easy the thread will easily be 12 pages+ (and probably end up becoming a staff thread after a while)
- 11,726
- 5,929
Maybe it's not because you don't have solid arguments, right?
- 2,635
- 3,399
lmao, comic vine ahh arguments
- 11,726
- 5,929
Buhan being superior BoG 
- 11,726
- 5,929
The film is no longer canon
- 11,726
- 5,929
The film isn't about destroying the Universe and we don't have a crt doing it.
- 2,141
- 2,464
You know, I think it’s really weird the Souls of planets are multiversal. Like, that creates so many questions on how the hell they work that are just never gonna get answered.
- 2,141
- 2,464
Though, I suppose this means Fullbrings in Dragon Ball would be crazy OP if they ever drew on the Soul of the Planet.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,908
- 3,802
Dragon ball fans trying to clown me proving they can’t scale evidence #8327638228379238
Similar threads
