• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

said the same guy who deny Low 1-C DBH hmmmmmm
In Planck’s defense, the evidence for Low 1-C crack of time could be slightly better. This is what we know about it now:
The crack of time contains infinite 4-dimensional timelines in the form of small crystals. The destruction of the crystals is consistently juxtaposed with statements about timelines or the very distortion of time and space. The crystals display images of events across time too. The crack of time is stated to contain non-existent history. To reach prison planet, the sky is fractured to create a crystalline rupture revealing a space with countless crystals. It's directly called a space between dimensions. It's said to be separated yet adjoined to all dimensions.

It's a contruct that transcends time. The crack of time, where Mechikabura was sealed, was stated to be a space beyond time. The fight against Demigra in the crack of time was called an adventure beyond time and space. The battles there are stated to take place in super-dimensional spaceand hyperdimensional space multiple times. Reaching it was described as an act of transcending time and space. It's said to be separated from the dimension of time. "Time" is also referred to as an axis in Dragon Ball Heroes multiple times.

When entering the crack of time, characters become unquantifiably larger than 4-dimensional constructs. The size of the crystals relative to the characters ranges from somewhat larger than them to noticably smaller than them. The crystals appear as numerous and miniscule as endless stars. Within the crack of time, Fu holds a distorted universe in his hand which is smaller than an arm and monitors an infinitely small Goku from the outside.

It's far beyond the scope of the multiverse itself. After nuking the multiverse, Demigra went to the crack of time to be safe from the destruction. It's stated to be out of reach for the gods and the highest in the dragon ball cosmic hierarchy, with Super Shenron's power explicitly incapable of reaching the universe tree in it, hence it could only destroy the rootsthat were sapping energy from universes. Even after the destruction of an infinite multiverse, no damage to the crack of time was mentioned or visualized.
This is decent stuff. It’s stated to be a super-dimension, lie beyond space-time, be unreachable via 2-A stuff, and view the timelines as small and insignificant (even Planck said in the ongoing staff revision that viewing space-time as specks would be enough for Low 1-C in his eyes). The issue is, it doesn’t have just enough evidence of qualitative superiority by this site’s standards to be upgraded from merely above baseline 2-A. I mean… death battle buys Low 1-C Crack of Time, hence why they had Archie Silver at 6-D and Trunks at 5-D in the Q&A blog. But without something at the very least like a higher plane statement, we’re just unfortunately short of proof of an inaccessible gap.

But just as many of the staff are even starting to admit, the standards for Low 1-C and cutoff point where a “higher plane outside time” can be considered Low 1-C rather than above baseline 2-A are hilariously vague and messy.
 
In Planck’s defense, the evidence for Low 1-C crack of time could be slightly better. This is what we know about it now:

This is decent stuff. It’s stated to be a super-dimension, lie beyond space-time, be unreachable via 2-A stuff, and view the timelines as small and insignificant (even Planck said in the ongoing staff revision that viewing space-time as specks would be enough for Low 1-C in his eyes). The issue is, it doesn’t have just enough evidence of qualitative superiority by this site’s standards to be upgraded from merely above baseline 2-A. I mean… death battle buys Low 1-C Crack of Time, hence why they had Archie Silver at 6-D and Trunks at 5-D in the Q&A blog. But without something at the very least like a higher plane statement, we’re just unfortunately short of proof of an inaccessible gap.
The CRT that @Reiner What is doing wouldn't change level 1 things as they are?
 
In Planck’s defense, the evidence for Low 1-C crack of time could be slightly better. This is what we know about it now:

This is decent stuff. It’s stated to be a super-dimension, lie beyond space-time, be unreachable via 2-A stuff, and view the timelines as small and insignificant (even Planck said in the ongoing staff revision that viewing space-time as specks would be enough for Low 1-C in his eyes). The issue is, it doesn’t have just enough evidence of qualitative superiority by this site’s standards to be upgraded from merely above baseline 2-A. I mean… death battle buys Low 1-C Crack of Time, hence why they had Archie Silver at 6-D and Trunks at 5-D in the Q&A blog. But without something at the very least like a higher plane statement, we’re just unfortunately short of proof of an inaccessible gap.
no no no, i present the exact same of what you said, and people still disagree anyway, let face the truth, no one want DB get to tier 1, Arale have tier 1 without any problem, until DB start scaling to her, that the truth
 
In Planck’s defense, the evidence for Low 1-C crack of time could be slightly better. This is what we know about it now:

This is decent stuff. It’s stated to be a super-dimension, lie beyond space-time, be unreachable via 2-A stuff, and view the timelines as small and insignificant (even Planck said in the ongoing staff revision that viewing space-time as specks would be enough for Low 1-C in his eyes). The issue is, it doesn’t have just enough evidence of qualitative superiority by this site’s standards to be upgraded from merely above baseline 2-A. I mean… death battle buys Low 1-C Crack of Time, hence why they had Archie Silver at 6-D and Trunks at 5-D in the Q&A blog. But without something at the very least like a higher plane statement, we’re just unfortunately short of proof of an inaccessible gap.

But just as many of the staff are even starting to admit, the standards for Low 1-C and cutoff point where a “higher plane outside time” can be considered Low 1-C rather than above baseline 2-A are hilariously vague and messy.
Important disclaimer: I personally think that timelines being actual specks displaced across a higher order space would make the totality of that space Low 1-C.

But my opinion =/= site standard.
 
no no no, i present the exact same of what you said, and people still disagree anyway, let face the truth, no one want DB get to tier 1, Arale have tier 1 without any problem, until DB start scaling to her, that the truth
I mean, we were on the verge of gaining “possible Low 1-C crack of time” before the revision got stonewalled hard by Strym and some other guy who tried using Zastando arguments. To be fair though, at some point, we Dragon Ball supporters need to get better at recognizing and squashing out stonewalling if this verse is getting anywhere. Strym spent hundreds of messages stonewalling the Low 1-C crack of time revision by arguing that “the crystals aren’t actually timelines.” You guys could have ended that by simply pointing out that the crack of time was called “the space between dimensions,” but instead you entertained his poor arguments and “contradictions.”

I remember saying I joined this site because the Low 1-C neutral space staff thread was going horribly, and I wanted to do something about it. The first thing that caught my attention even before I was fully registered was that Pein spent a great deal of time stonewalling the thread with “3-A macrocosm” and “perpendicular time flow” arguments that could have been debunked extremely easily, but instead you guys were playing into his hands and entertaining his stuff.
 
I mean, we were on the verge of gaining “possible Low 1-C crack of time” before the revision got stonewalled hard by Strym and some other guy who tried using Zastando arguments. To be fair though, at some point, we Dragon Ball supporters need to get better at recognizing and squashing out stonewalling if this verse is getting anywhere. Strym spent hundreds of messages stonewalling the Low 1-C crack of time revision by arguing that “the crystals aren’t actually timelines.” You guys could have ended that by simply pointing out that the crack of time was called “the space between dimensions,” but instead you entertained his poor arguments and “contradictions.”
Look at how fast staffs agree with him, i understand no point to argue anymore, simply because they don't want to see tier 1 DB, that all, so i don't bother to argue
 
This is decent stuff. It’s stated to be a super-dimension, lie beyond space-time, be unreachable via 2-A stuff, and view the timelines as small and insignificant (even Planck said in the ongoing staff revision that viewing space-time as specks would be enough for Low 1-C in his eyes). The issue is, it doesn’t have just enough evidence of qualitative superiority by this site’s standards to be upgraded from merely above baseline 2-A. I mean… death battle buys Low 1-C Crack of Time, hence why they had Archie Silver at 6-D and Trunks at 5-D in the Q&A blog. But without something at the very least like a higher plane statement, we’re just unfortunately short of proof of an inaccessible gap.
Unfortunately, in DT's eyes, even if the space that contains Universe is infinite or very large compared to single Universe which is finite, won't be enough for Tier 1 but rather only if it's 5D axis or 5D volume would be that large. But ofc, you won't need this much mental gymnastics or have to be a good cook if you have this specific statements. Although DT is not the sole authority is another thing.
 
Hey so I noticed Zarbon had that 3 times multiplier accepted which y'know, based, but I just thought of a problem that could lead to so I wanted to ask something. Goku has a power level of 32,000 with the Kaiokenx4 which is superior to Vegeta who was 30,000 when he defeated Zarbon and during his fight with Recoome. So given that he has a higher power level than someone that beat transformed Zarbon that would mean KKx4 Goku also scales to 178.32 Zettatons right? And do we still treat the Kaioken as a linear multiplier?
 
Hey so I noticed Zarbon had that 3 times multiplier accepted which y'know, based, but I just thought of a problem that could lead to so I wanted to ask something. Goku has a power level of 32,000 with the Kaiokenx4 which is superior to Vegeta who was 30,000 when he defeated Zarbon and during his fight with Recoome. So given that he has a higher power level than someone that beat transformed Zarbon that would mean KKx4 Goku also scales to 178.32 Zettatons right? And do we still treat the Kaioken as a linear multiplier?
Probably was just talking about Kaio-ken x4 Goku's kamehameha
 
Hey so I noticed Zarbon had that 3 times multiplier accepted which y'know, based, but I just thought of a problem that could lead to so I wanted to ask something. Goku has a power level of 32,000 with the Kaiokenx4 which is superior to Vegeta who was 30,000 when he defeated Zarbon and during his fight with Recoome. So given that he has a higher power level than someone that beat transformed Zarbon that would mean KKx4 Goku also scales to 178.32 Zettatons right? And do we still treat the Kaioken as a linear multiplier?
Kaioken is still treated as a linear multiplier, so base Goku should probably be upgraded to keep it's consistency if that's the case. Also, it's really weird how the official translation and even the japanese scan says that Vegeta's power level was above 20,000 and not 30,000
 
Kaioken is still treated as a linear multiplier, so base Goku should probably be upgraded to keep it's consistency if that's the case. Also, it's really weird how the official translation and even the japanese scan says that Vegeta's power level was above 20,000 and not 30,000
If we upgrade Base Goku we end up with (Basic) Kaio-Ken Goku being stronger than Vegeta tho
 
Kaioken is still treated as a linear multiplier, so base Goku should probably be upgraded to keep it's consistency if that's the case.
But that's the issue, if we upgraded base Goku it'd cause an endless loop where the AP of these characters just keep rising.
 
I think it would be easier to scale Base Vegeta to 1/10th of Oozaru Vegeta, who has the same pl as Kaioken Namek Goku iirc, who's base form is 1/6th of First Form Frieza going off of what I suggested earlier. And then go from there.
 
Unfortunately, in DT's eyes, even if the space that contains Universe is infinite or very large compared to single Universe which is finite, won't be enough for Tier 1 but rather only if it's 5D axis or 5D volume would be that large. But ofc, you won't need this much mental gymnastics or have to be a good cook if you have this specific statements. Although DT is not the sole authority is another thing.
Would time being stated to be an axis in DBH help with the 5D axis stuff considering the neutral space is already accepted as Insignificant 5D?
 
I think it would be easier to scale Base Vegeta to 1/10th of Oozaru Vegeta, who has the same pl as Kaioken Namek Goku iirc, who's base form is 1/6th of First Form Frieza going off of what I suggested earlier. And then go from there.
I've checked the numbers, and Zarbons multiplier makes things weird if we're trying to make Kaioken x4 Goku scale to it.
 
Would time being stated to be an axis in DBH help with the 5D axis stuff considering the neutral space is already accepted as Insignificant 5D?
At worst, if the neutral space is insignificant 5D and the overarching timeline isn‘t either 6D or significant 5D, then wouldn’t the crack of time possibly be “insignificant 6D”? Or is that only if it contains significant 5D structures? If it is insignificant 6D, then by Ultima’s definition (which in my opinion is horrible logic but whatever) it is bigger than any significant 5D space, thus Low 1-C regardless. That’s only IF one can achieve insignificant 6D just by holding a timeline which itself contains insignificant 5D space
 
I've checked the numbers, and Zarbons multiplier makes things weird if we're trying to make Kaioken x4 Goku scale to it.
Yeah that's my concern lmao, shit gets weird if we go that route.

Transformed Zarbon = 178.32 Zettatons
KKx4 Goku = 178.32 Zettatons
Base Goku = 44.58 Zettatons
KKx2 Goku = 89.16 Zettatons
Saiyan Saga Vegeta = 89.16 Zettatons
Transformed Zarbon = 267.48 Zettatons

Repeat forever for universe level saiyan saga Goku.
 
Yeah that's my concern lmao, shit gets weird if we go that route.

Transformed Zarbon = 178.32 Zettatons
KKx4 Goku = 178.32 Zettatons
Base Goku = 44.58 Zettatons
KKx2 Goku = 89.16 Zettatons
Saiyan Saga Vegeta = 89.16 Zettatons
Transformed Zarbon = 267.48 Zettatons

Repeat forever for universe level saiyan saga Goku.
Basically Kaioken x4 and Zarbon's multiplier just can't mix no matter what it seems, just messes things up.
 
Back
Top