• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

Pretty sure most if not all of the evidence comes from the Toei continuity lol
Worse than not, in the DBS novel Brolly once again proved that the dimensions of the Universes are separated by space-time, Brolly and Gogeta had to distort space-time to enter the dimension of the swirling lights.

With that momentum, space-time distorts, and the two of them are fighting within a cracked dimensional wall, colliding with even greater intensity. It's a collision of unprecedented power against power.
 
I think like an Arale manga showed the GT lads
According to Toei, it considers every DBGT canonical timeline to be canon work (making all Toei part of the shared cosmology), in addition to Akira toriyama giving interviews that these timelines are alternative to the original work, but existing in the same multiverse of DB
 
The DB multiverse has the same cosmology, not changing anything for another series and the timelines are canon.
I’d argue if you need evidence from other timelines that don’t exist in canon to prove your argument for canon then the cosmology is inherently different.
 
I’d argue if you need evidence from other timelines that don’t exist in canon to prove your argument for canon then the cosmology is inherently different.
I say you need evidence to prove otherwise, as it's accepted as alternate timelines, but existing in the same multiverse, if you feel bad create a crt, I'd love to start war against the Spin-Offs from Saint Seiya too 🤤
 
I say you need evidence to prove otherwise, as it's accepted as alternate timelines, but existing in the same multiverse, if you feel bad create a crt, I'd love to start war against the Spin-Offs from Saint Seiya too 🤤
Cringe fandom wars aren’t my thing

bit I do think using everything Toei has made to somehow boost the manga is sus, and Saint Seiya isn’t a good comparison since we recently made the anime and all the Toei material non canon to the manga.
 
Cringe fandom wars aren’t my thing

bit I do think using everything Toei has made to somehow boost the manga is sus, and Saint Seiya isn’t a good comparison since we recently made the anime and all the Toei material non canon to the manga.
I think this is very cool, although Saint Seiya is a complete mess to get 2-A, the same goes here, where he uses other timelines to increase Saint Seiya to 2-A ( observation, use Spin-Offs to get 2-A, as the main verse makes no mention of infinite timelines)

Recently used TLC to get low 1-C for 8th sense, cool isn't it?
 
I think this is very cool, although Saint Seiya is a complete mess to get 2-A, the same goes here, where he uses other timelines to increase Saint Seiya to 2-A ( observation, use Spin-Offs to get 2-A, as the main verse makes no mention of infinite timelines)

Recently used TLC to get low 1-C for 8th sense, cool isn't it?
Cringe fandom beef continues to be cringe
 
I mean, I’d argue ND has 2-A cosmology on its own if you consider the past,present, and future being Alt timelines. Plus, most spinoffs aren’t considered alt timelines, but just additions to the main one.
I can see 2-B but not getting that far without having predictions of spinoffs
 
I mean, I’d argue ND has 2-A cosmology on its own if you consider the past,present, and future being Alt timelines. Plus, most spinoffs aren’t considered alt timelines, but just additions to the main one.
Don’t worry too much about Toby, he won’t do anything because it would set a precedent for DB to be split for the same reasons, and after all the work he’s done to help DB get to 2-C, he wouldn’t want to set a precedent that undoes it all.
 
Worse than not, in the DBS novel Brolly once again proved that the dimensions of the Universes are separated by space-time, Brolly and Gogeta had to distort space-time to enter the dimension of the swirling lights.

With that momentum, space-time distorts, and the two of them are fighting within a cracked dimensional wall, colliding with even greater intensity. It's a collision of unprecedented power against power.
The dimension of swirling lights is also said to be enrered after they clashed with a power beyond what the universe could hold, so it is arguably not even in the universe
 
the thing is, @TiltedFN argue that Neutral Space has it own time axis then the overarching timeline which encompass them which is the another time axis thus 6D, which is..................by all mean, a complete made up shit that i also disagree if i have permission to talk on that thread
I think someone pointing out that hit could use his tone Skip gave him the idea. But either way, neutral zone was already agreed as to be 5D but not significant, meaning the timeline itself had to be low 1C, this should have been straightforward, I was hugely irritated when I saw that 6D stuff. Now trying to make another thread to simply go back to the 5D would be difficult since most mods may not even bother reading before disagreeing
See, the low 1-C 5D is also being rejected
No It wasn't, it was already agreed that neutral zone was 5D but insignificant, meaning the timeline was at minimum, 5D and significant. Bringing in 6D meant he was arguing that neutral zone was now significant
 
I think someone pointing out that hit could use his tone Skip gave him the idea. But either way, neutral zone was already agreed as to be 5D but not significant, meaning the timeline itself had to be low 1C, this should have been straightforward, I was hugely irritated when I saw that 6D stuff. Now trying to make another thread to simply go back to the 5D would be difficult since most mods may not even bother reading before disagreeing

No It wasn't, it was already agreed that neutral zone was 5D but insignificant, meaning the timeline was at minimum, 5D and significant. Bringing in 6D meant he was arguing that neutral zone was now significant
I knew it would go bad
 
I think someone pointing out that hit could use his tone Skip gave him the idea. But either way, neutral zone was already agreed as to be 5D but not significant, meaning the timeline itself had to be low 1C, this should have been straightforward, I was hugely irritated when I saw that 6D stuff. Now trying to make another thread to simply go back to the 5D would be difficult since most mods may not even bother reading before disagreeing
That aparently was also rejected in the new thread, that was also a suggestion

No It wasn't, it was already agreed that neutral zone was 5D but insignificant, meaning the timeline was at minimum, 5D and significant. Bringing in 6D meant he was arguing that neutral zone was now significant
Do you know what 5D low 1-C is?
 
I was waiting for the new anime for Dragon Ball this year that had been rumored and nothing, I think I have to stop believing everything that comes out on the internet, I thought I would watch an anime right on my birthday, but nothing so far ;-;
 
the thing is, @TiltedFN argue that Neutral Space has it own time axis then the overarching timeline which encompass them which is the another time axis thus 6D, which is..................by all mean, a complete made up shit that i also disagree if i have permission to talk on that thread
Yes I did argue for 6-D neutral space, because I thought it would be made apparent that the entire dimension is clearly separate from the timeline, with the scans and translations I had sent, but I even said in the OP if you were to take away the neutral space arguments, the timeline would still overarch the insignificant 5-D neutral space and result in low 1-C. But pein tried to say the universes are not spatialtemporally separate, and there only exist one timeline, when we literally have a note in our page,
Note: We consider the universes in Dragon Ball alternate time-spaces relative to each other, hence why Zen'ō is rated as 2-C, despite the events in the Goku Black Saga showing parallel timelines encompassing the whole of the multiverse.

The reason for this is that Universe 7 by itself has already been shown to contain parallel space-time continuums within its globe, such as the Room of Spirit and Time, which is still affected by time travel; which proves that the new timelines can encompass other space-times as well, and thus the events in the Future Trunks Saga don't prove anything in the way of the universes being physically connected.
We acknowledge the timelines to encompass other timelines, and we accept the universes to be 2-C, we have multiple blogs and multiple crts and mountains of evidence to prove so, yet pein put forth no evidence at all and went against what has currently been accepted with no contradictions, so even if I left out the neutral space argument, he still would have used that rat ass argument, how staff agreed with this? I have no idea, its just absolutely wild, like just look at those arguments lol, there is no way he is being fr. And now reined is trying to get it closed at all cost lmao when no tier 1 specialist have even showed up in the thread, like ultima.
 
I called Reiner to help with the whole DBS tier 1 mess

Reiner automatically: I disagree and whoever disagrees with me I disagree too

Joking apart
May God knows, if there can be even better Tier 1 argument, but Time axis is not that is guaranteed, if it was then I would have upgraded Dragonball and Ben 10 both to Tier 1 long ago. But, it's not.
 
May God knows, if there can be even better Tier 1 argument, but Time axis is not that is guaranteed, if it was then I would have upgraded Dragonball and Ben 10 both to Tier 1 long ago. But, it's not.
You just used dt's arguments which were from 2021 on a thread that was trying to get the universes to be their own spacetimes, it doesn't even apply, and stop brining up ben 10, i seriously don't care what you could and couldn't upgrade with the verse, it seems to me like you hate other verses being upgraded when your favorite verse couldn't, now you go out of your way to use rat arguments that don't correlate at all.
 
You just used dt's arguments which were from 2021 on a thread that was trying to get the universes to be their own spacetimes, it doesn't even apply, and stop brining up ben 10, i seriously don't care what you could and couldn't upgrade with the verse, it seems to me like you hate other verses being upgraded when your favorite verse couldn't, now you go out of your way to use rat arguments that don't correlate at all.
and people still ask why db fans have bad reputation here
 
Back
Top