• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

I don't feel like it's that bad only real retcon is kabito kia everything else could he worked with in the setting.

(The manga always thought SS3 was stronger then super buu and buuhan I'm sorry it's true the anime was just wrong)
Still enough retcons like the metamoru one to invalidate any possible way of merging Toei with the DBS anime tho
 
Ok, Daima contradicts half of DBS yet it's still canon to both DBS manga and Anime. I'm glad this ends once and for all the absurd attempts of some to canonize Toei for the DBS anime
DBS Anime is continuation of DBZ Kai here tho, so as far as this site is concerned, Toei is......semi canon to DBS Anime, as in, the bits that Kai kept from the og anime
 
DBS Anime is continuation of DBZ Kai here tho, so as far as this site is concerned, Toei is......semi canon to DBS Anime, as in, the bits that Kai kept from the og anime
Indeed that blunder will forever be a mark against this sight until the day it is undone
 
We arent doing ourselves any favors with how we present our arguments, and letting people who disagree misrepresent our points.

I never thought this would go thru tbh
Not really sure how much more simple it could be, as far as tier 1 CRTs go it’s pretty easy to follow.

It’s one step removed from a literal “afterlife is 5D” statement, it’s pretty blatant.
 
We arent doing ourselves any favors with how we present our arguments, and letting people who disagree misrepresent our points.

I never thought this would go thru tbh
Honestly, if people want to disagree, you could bring the Word of God and they'd still find a way to disagree.

Just look at the counterarguments in the thread — all they said was "This isn't enough" without explaining why, until Qaw showed up and suddenly everyone agreed with him.
 
Honestly, if people want to disagree, you could bring the Word of God and they'd still find a way to disagree.

Just look at the counterarguments in the thread — all they said was "This isn't enough" without explaining why, until Qaw showed up and suddenly everyone agreed with him.
'I don't think we should take a statement three translators have said means the afterlife is a higher dimension and upgrade that to an illogical degree by treating it like a higher dimension, btw here's me quoting some unnamed translator no one on this site knows'

Its a bit reductive, but that's more or less the quality of their arguements

'Words can mean a whole bunch of things, I'm gonna ignore where you clarified exactly what this meant and treat your supporting evidence like it's your main arguements'
 
Not to mention the 'I don't feel like it's been portrayed that way' as if thats any sort of actual arguement.

Oh, and creating new requirements out of thin air.
 
'I don't think we should take a statement three translators have said means the afterlife is a higher dimension and upgrade that to an illogical degree by treating it like a higher dimension, btw here's me quoting some unnamed translator no one on this site knows'

Its a bit reductive, but that's more or less the quality of their arguements

'Words can mean a whole bunch of things, I'm gonna ignore where you clarified exactly what this meant and treat your supporting evidence like it's your main arguements'
Well that seems more than a bit reductive. What he said was that transcend is a logical translation, but that it doesn’t have to mean transcend in a way that leads to low 1-c.
 
We got jumped from every possible direction

Even people who haven't touched the Wiki for almost 2 years returned, js because it's a tier 1 db thread
Fac3v1jagAQGnZ5.png
 
Well that seems more than a bit reductive. What he said was that transcend is a logical translation, but that it doesn’t have to mean transcend in a way that leads to low 1-c.
The translations said it was a spatial transcendence, but it was one guidebook statement the entire thread hinged on.

Picked an impossible fight and used that as an excuse to perform like crap ngl
 
Hi yeah so question

What’s the point of a translation team if the translation team’s understanding of the language can be “up for interpretation” by a non speaking mod? I’m just saying I don’t think you have room to say how you could interpret something when two interpreters agree with the same interpretation.
 
Hi yeah so question

What’s the point of a translation team if the translation team’s understanding of the language can be “up for interpretation” by a non speaking mod? I’m just saying I don’t think you have room to say how you could interpret something when two interpreters agree with the same interpretation.
I don’t think evidence amounting to one statement was enough to pass tbh, prob should have waited to collect more evidence.
Both these things are true at once
 
Which of the Dragon Ball CRTs are still open? I'm happy to wait, I just want to know which ones to monitor so I can keep myself posted and know when I can post my next CRT.
 
Does any of you people know how to do image renders?
If you got photoshop (or gimp) you can do it in there by deleting unneeded segments and making the background transparent. I've done it a few times like that, but I'm bad about leaving in some artifacting (or however you spell it).

If you want an image done I can wing an attempt but it's been a bit since I've done it.
 
I don’t think evidence amounting to one statement was enough to pass tbh, prob should have waited to collect more evidence.
I truth be told doubt the evidence exists in the toei timeline for such a thing, but it would at least be good support if more was ever found.

I still think offical dragonball will just be tier 1 eventually. If super didn't end do to covid we would probably already have it
 
I still think offical dragonball will just be tier 1 eventually. If super didn't end do to covid we would probably already have it
What do you mean by official? If it's just licensed material than the easiest way to get to 1-C is through scaling to the one time fissure thing if you compose the arguments correctly. One person, who's name escapes me, DM'ed about it since it involved time travel or something.

If you can prove time-travel to a temporally erased multiverse you'd get some weird 3D+3 thing going on and get 1-C in that fashion.
 
Back
Top