• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

sddefault.jpg
2084797_snoozingwell_now-s-your-chance-to-be-a.gif
 
i mean, small is used as indicator of young age, no?

anyway should i watch GT? i refrained from spoilers but i heard alot of negative opinions, 64 episodes is not too long i guess
You can interpret it either way

You should and come to your own conclusions. I personally liked it for what it was, but certainly has a lot of missed opportunities and can understand why many didn't like it off the back of Z-Anime.
 
In Dr. Slump, characters can go into books as fictionoal mediums. Like, they literally get transported into the book by shrinking into them, and when they do, the book has it's own universe, it's own world, and it's own characters. So, shouldn't this be R>F?
 
I'm gonna be frank, vsbw should not have a strict policy for using other languages, outside of staff/content revision threads
people could use inappropriate language and not realize it because they don't understand the language (and the wiki wouldn't censure it)
As an example, a quarter of what a certain user in another thread usually says
 
In Dr. Slump, characters can go into books as fictionoal mediums. Like, they literally get transported into the book by shrinking into them, and when they do, the book has it's own universe, it's own world, and it's own characters. So, shouldn't this be R>F?
Maybe, but that makes the books 11-C since Arale's world is the "base" reality.
 
Wdym? I'm confused
In regards to R>F, whether or not something is considered 1-A or 11-C is dependent on what is considered the base reality. The books are treated as they're "below" the "normal" world of Dr. Slump where Arale and co. live and we as the reader spend the most time. Toriyama's world where he and his editor live (assuming R>F is true for that) is considered "above" Arale's world and would be 1-A.
 
In Dr. Slump, characters can go into books as fictionoal mediums. Like, they literally get transported into the book by shrinking into them, and when they do, the book has it's own universe, it's own world, and it's own characters. So, shouldn't this be R>F?
I find Hax more immersive than R>F. And speaking of the books, they would fall into the 11-C category because the characters have to adapt to enter the world of the book. So there's no clear R>F in that; unless they tell us that entering the book implies some difference with the base reality that is Arale's world. If not, then nothing, it would go into the Hax I said, I think.
 
In Dr. Slump, characters can go into books as fictionoal mediums. Like, they literally get transported into the book by shrinking into them, and when they do, the book has it's own universe, it's own world, and it's own characters. So, shouldn't this be R>F?
No, there is more than one reason to that:
  1. Pretty sure that they aren´t portrayed as being Qualitatively Superior to the world in the book
  2. The characters being able to normally enter on the Non-1-A world would automatically count as an anti-feat for them being 1-A
It seems just like Immersion to me, similar to how Mario entering on the worlds inside the paintings in Super Mario 64 ins´t a proof of R>F Transcendence
 
Back
Top