- 1,470
- 1,151
Are you referring to the neutral zone?If the space that contains the multiverses is stated to be infinite. Would that bump db cosmo to 2A?
Case 1 uni is infite
Case 2 they are finite.
No hypertimelines![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you referring to the neutral zone?If the space that contains the multiverses is stated to be infinite. Would that bump db cosmo to 2A?
Case 1 uni is infite
Case 2 they are finite.
No hypertimelines![]()
YesAre you referring to the neutral zone?
If it's infinite it would be 2A yea, it's shown that the 2C universes don't fill up the entire space, it being infinite would mean it would have a volume the could contain a infinite amount of said universes, which actually could be 2x baseline 2A for dbs as they have 2 low2c spacetimes in each universe and 3x baseline for toei, since each macrocosm has 3 low2c spacetimes
It wasI thought the space between universes was accepted as insignificant 5D. Maybe I'm wrong tho
Not necessary, in relation to Low 2-C it would be a full rating due to the fourth-dimension being temporal. If it is 4 dimensions of space + one of time you would still need to prove that the fourth-dimension of space is of significant sizeHuh, just realized it, if Ultima's plan is to make space time feats Low 2-C independent of size, wouldn't that happens for Low 1-C and above as well since it follows the same logic?
only time axis, space axis still require size to be significantHuh, just realized it, if Ultima's plan is to make space time feats Low 2-C independent of size, wouldn't that happens for Low 1-C and above as well since it follows the same logic?
Oh so Ultima is also looking to fix the Time Axis size requirement for higher time dimensions?only time axis, space axis still require size to be significant
Not really, the space axis/size is what determines if a space time is Low 2-C nowadays, time axis are assumed infinite by defaultonly time axis, space axis still require size to be significant
He’s referring to how a time axis would make that 3D space infinite by default. So higher spaces wouldn’t be affected by this. (Unfortunately)Not really, the space axis/size is what determines if a space time is Low 2-C nowadays, time axis are assumed infinite by default
also other spaces if they have time, Time Creates snapshots regardless, of course, unless the space is actually timeless......for some reasonHe’s referring to how a time axis would make that 3D space infinite by default. So higher spaces wouldn’t be affected by this. (Unfortunately)
Two hax threadsIm very late to the party here HAII GUYSSSS what yall cookin here?
How would this affect our scaling for the macrocosm?Huh, just realized it, if Ultima's plan is to make space time feats Low 2-C independent of size, wouldn't that happens for Low 1-C and above as well since it follows the same logic?
yeahHow would this affect our scaling for the macrocosm?
Like that'd make the time chamber's low 2-C
This seems like an important hint to what you’re going to be doing in that sandbox, and yet I have no clue what in that episode you’d be interested in.Dragon Ball Super, episode 63 - "Don't You Disgrace Saiyan Cells! Vegeta's Fierce Battle Commences!"
- Due to the vast amount of inconsistencies between various feats, statements, and information given about Time Skip, such as the mechanics explained by Vados and Whis, (that it is merely limited Time Travel that stores time) being directly contradicted on multiple occasions, including feats like freezing Goku in time (twice), Hit's own words, and Word of God, or what even qualifies as Time Skip, as Tides of Time (Hit's Dimension-Shift) was initially stated not to be, but this was contradicted later in the Tournament of Power, or regarding how Time Skip has a reliant Dimension connected to it for Time Storage contradicts Hit's testimony regarding how he never made Time Skip do more than its initial basic function before, (and the basic mechanics, as he needs to skip time first to then store it, contradicting even that description), etc. has created a patchwork of incoherence. Due to this, and how the Time Freezing and Travelling related parts of the ability must both be simultaneously true for the plot of the Dragon Ball Super Anime to make sense (as Vados/Whis explanation is the sole reason he has his greater Time Dimension abilities thoughout the Assassination Arc and the Tournament of Power, and he needs the abilities to also specifically be Time Stop for certain major plot sequences, like Time Cage, {a Time Stop ability which is explicitly described as "Time Skip in Reverse"} to affect Jiren), as well as the fact they are used interchangeably at several points, our community has decided to index the ability as both Time Travel and Time Stop, and to simply reconcile the best we can by ignoring these glaring contradictions to get the most accurate listing of Hit's ability. As such, Jiren's ability to get around these abilities will be indexed as they would be if this inconsistency did not exist. This includes resisting both time travel and stop.
......you can't resist someone time traveling tho?.........man, how does that make any sense?Resistance to Time Travel
Is simple.......you can't resist someone time traveling tho?.........man, how does that make any sense?
no, if you time travel alongside them you either have time travel of your own to intercept them or Immearuable speed for the same effect......also Hit only travels to the future, not the past, and even then that would be Acausality type 1, event THEN it wouldn't apply to DB since traveling to the past doesn't change the futureIs simple.
If someone time travels to the future, and you go with them, you're resistancing the ffect of staying in the past.
I imagine it's much like resisting BFR. Someone tries to force teleport you, doesn't work. Except in this case temporally.......you can't resist someone time traveling tho?.........man, how does that make any sense?
Immearuable speed for the same effect
Not really, If someone time travels, and you can follow them or intercepts then, that means you can resist the effects of someone sending you to the future.no, if you time travel alongside them you either have time travel of your own to intercept them or Immearuable speed for the same effect
Er, no, that means you're just time traveling to follow them. Or you're punching to the future, which isn't resisting time travel, but range-Not really, If someone time travels, and you can follow them or intercepts then, that means you can resist the effects of someone sending you to the future.
Like, someone go to the future, that means leaving the past behind, and you can tag them while they going to the future. That means you're resisting the effects of the time travel.
Not really, If someone time travels, and you can follow them or intercepts then, that means you can resist the effects of someone sending you to the future.
.........that would be resistance to BFR, even then that doesn't apply here as Hit goes alone to the futureNot really, If someone time travels, and you can follow them or intercepts then, that means you can resist the effects of someone sending you to the future.
no, that means you yourself is Time Traveling to follow them, you are not resisting anything as there is absolutely nothing to resist in the first placeLike, someone go to the future, that means leaving the past behind, and you can tag them while they going to the future. That means you're resisting the effects of the time travel.
that would be resisting BFR, not Hit time travelingI imagine it's much like resisting BFR. Someone tries to force teleport you, doesn't work. Except in this case temporally.
"in reverse" aka the oposite of advancing time is to make it not move at allNo, it's resisting Time Cage, which is "Time Skip in reverse." Time Skip being currently indexed as time travel and time stop. So in this case he's legit just resisting someone trying to force him through time.
No, since in this scenario you don't have the ability to time travel, so you need to resist.no, that means you yourself is Time Traveling to follow them, you are not resisting anything as there is absolutely nothing to resist in the first place
i don't think you understand, in the scenarion you describe, one would have the ability to Time Travel, without that the scenario you described makes no senseNo, since in this scenario you don't have the ability to time travel, so you need to resist.
That's what i said, one character have a time travel ability, and the other don't.i don't think you understand, in the scenarion you describe, one would have the ability to Time Travel, without that the scenario you described makes no sense
as i said, in the situation you are describing, the other must also be able to time travel, else the situation you described makes no senseThat's what i said, one character have a time travel ability, and the other don't.
which would mean that they do have the ability to Time Travel as that is the most standard thing about Immeasurable speed, meaning that they would be able to time travelLes't me explain better.
Person A can go to the future. Person B can't do that. If Person A goes to the future, and Person B is able to follows then even without the ability to time travel, they either have Immerasuble speed
no because person A is still time traveling in the scenarion you described, that wasn't nulled, person B simply followed them, or can powernull the ability of time travel of the other character. And no, you would't need speed to do that.
No i mean, nulled the effects for themselfs.no because person A is still time traveling in the scenarion you described, that wasn't nulled, person B simply followed them
there is no effect on themselves, the things isn't even being used on them in the first place, unless you mean they aren't affect by the attack in the future? which would be Acausality and not power nullNo i mean, nulled the effects for themselfs.
acausality you mean? also that isn't what Goku did, he followed Hit, he wasn't unnafected by his skip, he followed him to stop his from attacking in the first placeLike, Person A time travels to the future, and Person B is unnafected by that.