- 641
- 461
- Thread starter
- #81
So you agree with this? but where do the potential implications come from?Remove the "At least", because it implied he could potentially neg High-Godly. Also he should have Immortality type 3 neg
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you agree with this? but where do the potential implications come from?Remove the "At least", because it implied he could potentially neg High-Godly. Also he should have Immortality type 3 neg
Yes, i'm fine with it either way.So you agree with this?
No, because you wrote: At least Mid-Godly. The sentence will suggest that he at least can neg mid-godly, potentially higher, higher than mid godly is high godly, so remove the "At least"but where do the potential implications come from?
Ahh okay, I understandNo, because you wrote: At least Mid-Godly. The sentence will suggest that he at least can neg mid-godly, potentially higher, higher than mid godly is high godly, so remove the "At least"
How about this?
BumpAlso he should have Immortality type 3 neg
But it's unknown to what extent. You could put At least in front of it.
If I look at Future Trunks' profile it seems that regeneration negation has been accepted for a long time, but it's just that it doesn't say which type.At least Mid-High negation seems legit to me.
Because there was a previous thread about upgrading "DBS Zamasu Regeneration Upgrade" and it was received as Mid-Godly. How about a kind of Mid-Godly neg for this?Regeneration Negation (Nullified Future Zamasu's regeneration)
How about this?
As said, I agree.Because there was a previous thread about upgrading "DBS Zamasu Regeneration" and it was received as Mid-Godly. How about a kind of Mid-Godly neg for this?
Okay, Thanks.As said, I agree.
Sorry to bother you, could you tag DDM & LordGriffin here?As said, I agree.
We need his opinion again because there is a slight change.If I look at Future Trunks' profile it seems that regeneration negation has been accepted for a long time, but it's just that it doesn't say which type.
Because there was a previous thread about upgrading "DBS Zamasu Regeneration" and it was received as Mid-Godly. How about a kind of Mid-Godly neg for this?
It's no bother ayySorry to bother you, could you tag DDM & LordGriffin here?
@LordGriffin1000 @DarkDragonMedeusIf I look at Future Trunks' profile it seems that regeneration negation has been accepted for a long time, but it's just that it doesn't say which type.
Because there was a previous thread about upgrading "DBS Zamasu Regeneration Upgrade" and it was received as Mid-Godly. How about a kind of Mid-Godly neg for this?
I filed at least Mid-High, possibly Mid-Godly. Recalling Atsushi Kido in the interview with the release of episode 66, said in the Dragon Ball world standards Merged Zamasu as a "cheat" character, even amongst character such as Cell and Majin Buu.This should make everyone happy as it keeps the potential Mid-Godly regeneration that Zamasu possess but highlights that his regeneration was effected to some degree so incorporates his lesser feats of regeneration as a low end. However, if y'all want something different, I'm open to suggestions.
Forgot about that, yeah at least Mid-High, possibly Mid-Godly is all good.I filed at least Mid-High, possibly Mid-Godly. Recalling Atsushi Kido in the interview with the release of episode 66, said in the Dragon Ball world standards Merged Zamasu as a "cheat" character, even amongst character such as Cell and Majin Buu.
It looks like DDM also previously looked fine with at least Mid-High regen negation
Alright, thanks for your input.Forgot about that, yeah at least Mid-High, possibly Mid-Godly is all good.
Both, Goku is just scaled.Question: Would this also apply to Goku with the genkidama or only the spirit sword?
Yeah I think everything has been accepted with negation being possibly for godlyCan this be applied to their profile?
Don’t forget Goku’s 3-A ratings need to be changed from the other thread with the added justifications