- 12,116
- 6,084
I really didn't understand what he said and what you said, could you explain better bro?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball: Infinite Universe
- Thread starter Reiner04
- Start date
- Status
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #642
Translations are same and so this has nothing to do with translation. It's about arguements.
- 12,116
- 6,084
Then we can continue, thank you very much.
- 12,116
- 6,084
- 12,116
- 6,084
Exactly
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #648
One more.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #649
My bad, it's 5 statements now.
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 8,548
- 7,205
"It's been a day, lemme see how that DB CRT is goi-OH MY GOODNESS"
If the translations are indeed accurate now, then I see no issue with the premise of this thread. I tentatively agree.
If the translations are indeed accurate now, then I see no issue with the premise of this thread. I tentatively agree.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #651
- 1,649
- 1,284
Still wondering how a banned user could still be allowed to make an argument
- 12,116
- 6,084
I also ask the same question
- 10,116
- 11,488
Has been discussed before on the RVR. As long as the member they contact wants to relay their arguments and they don't harass them for it, it's not disallowed. Specially if their arguments can help with a thread.
- 1,010
- 712
Infinite space filled with infinite darkness, infinitely expansive universe, galaxies that exists infinitely ...sounds as concrete as you can get, like what more do you even need, most verses don't even have this much statements, and they are all literal, straightforward and are stated in trustworthy sources. I'd suggest that we add all the Zamasu's translations to The OP and stop derailing the threadIdk if this was discussed already but someone on cord is begging me to send this but apparently you guys have the wrong translation for the elder guru and herms translated it to this
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #656
It does kind of stonewall thread for their premise or sometimes unnecessarily extends the debate with he himself not be the person defending it, but anyway ig it's was just one time thing.
- 3,486
- 5,161
Also DDM said he was leaning towards agree but wants to hear Fire’s thoughts (smh 7 pages)
- 8,845
- 9,506
This is the corrected translation yes. However, whatever scans that say "infinitely expanding" might me a mistranslation from infinitely "expansive".
- 11,910
- 4,281
Well, if the argument is that the darkness is what it is infinite, then we still have this problem
- 10,116
- 11,488
They are already asking in the translation thread, indeed.
- 3,486
- 5,161
Reiner already mentioned that here Omega seeing something from the outside not looking infinite isnt an anti feat
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #662
- 8,845
- 9,506
- 11,910
- 4,281
when did i said that? if what is being argued is that the darkness surrounding the universe is infinite, then there should be a darkness surrounding the light of the universe, which there isn't
Last edited:
- 2,565
- 2,209
Even then expanding could just mean it expands infinitely rather than it grows infinitely
- 11,910
- 4,281
well i am confused now, what even is the proposal? is that the universe is infinite in general? or is that there is a greater darkness that is infinite surrounding the celestial bodies of the universe?
- 1,010
- 712
The universe is infinite in size. That's the proposal.
- 1,010
- 712
Could it be re-translated to make sure?
- 11,910
- 4,281
yeah, but people keep talking about that the argument is that darkness is infinite and that the light side is only the observable universe, that is even the counter to the "edge" and "center" arguments in the op
- 3,486
- 5,161
The universe is infinite but the infinite part of the living realm is just darkness
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #672
Okay man... What's so confusing about it? It's a infinite space of light and darkness together, there are places beyond observable universe that constantly expands to reach infinite, there are planets, creatures beyond this observable Universe where light cannot reach.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #673
Since translations has been confirmed by @Executor_N0 to be same and it's not a issue with translation but arguments (which sans had that flowery), do you think you can give any opinion on thread? Also among Staff (plancks and DDM are okay with GT being used as primary source and Damage hasn't responded to plancks argument about why they should be different yet).
Fezzih_007
He/Him- 7,623
- 2,839
isn't this just a visual scene? Like, they want to show the audience something but can't accuretly depict that, so they show in that way? I don't think you need to take as face value.
- 11,910
- 4,281
well, the edge statement for one, the statement never specifies only talking about any "observable" universe, and plus, it is on the edge and yet there is no darkness, better yet we see no darkness when we see what the universe looks like from the outside, this said darkness is contradicted to even exist
- 10,116
- 11,488
While that is true, it should still be taken into account.
Regardless, I believe there's more support to it than against.
- 11,910
- 4,281
they could show it no problem, just make a darkness surround the normal cosmos
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #678
We see most of the light on the center and as we move on we see just clouds and all, not really that much light, about why they even shown light, meh, fiction ain't strict with presenting darkness at all (except rares) example blackhole and all. We gotta find it ourselves.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #679
We can literally see light and darkness being separated, supporting the secondary evidences.
- 11,910
- 4,281
we see numerous stars all arround it, even more so in other showings
- Status
Similar threads
