Dragon ball Discussion Rules Removal

[Aachintya31]

• Do not attempt to change the current Dragon Ball cosmology and power ratings without new evidence from an ongoing manga or anime series. We have heard all of the arguments many times before, and are so exhausted of constantly dealing with those topics that bringing them up recurrently leads to nowhere, with the discussion threads being oftentimes closed immediately.
• Do not create discussion threads trying to upgrade the Z Anime and GT characters based on Super Buu crashing the universe by breaking the walls between dimensions with his Vice Shout as it was discussed and debunked countless times.
• Please do not create discussion threads about the Dragon Ball Super characters being upgraded to 3-A based on Base Goku's revision, as the topic has been discussed to exhaustion at this point and every thread tends to be a repeat of the last one. The characters who became Universal have demonstrated legitimate scaling to be upgraded, while the characters who didn't have not. Failure to adhere to this rule will result in the thread being locked.

These discussion rules for dragon ball verse should be removed as they make no sense now. Literal Joke Rules. These three rules, yeah pretty much it
Yeet them off

Agree : @DarkDragonMedeus , @Reiner , @Tyranno223 ,@KingNanaya ,@StekFence ,@omegabronic, @LordTracer, @LordGriffin1000 , @Padaruyos ,@Eseseso , @TheGodOfICE777, @Phsccarvalho
Disagree : @LuffyRuffy46307, @Reiner

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

I disagree, I think these rules should still apply, a lot of people are trying to do this, same for Universes being 3-A, a lot of people have tried this, and maybe it will happen again, and we have demo on the finite universe thread that the Op stated he would downgrade the Universe from 2-C to 3-A, I strongly disagree with that.

 

[Aachintya31]

I disagree

You yourself make tons of cosmology threads. Stop that before disagreeing.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

You yourself make tons of cosmology threads. Stop that before disagreeing.

I do, but it's to get the verse with its right scales, I'm not breaking any rules, we've heard these same arguments a trillion times, the answer is no, we're tired of topics like this.

 

[Aachintya31]

we've heard these same arguments a trillion times, the answer is no

This is the purpose of this thread.
The discussion rules make no sense.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

This is the purpose of this thread.
The discussion rules make no sense.

Worse than they do, if there are rules it's because literally this has been done millions of times, this will only lead to more repeated topics and trust me, we're already tired of this

 

[Phsccarvalho]

I disagree, I think these rules should still apply, a lot of people are trying to do this, same for Universes being 3-A, a lot of people have tried this, and maybe it will happen again, and we have demo on the finite universe thread that the Op stated he would downgrade the Universe from 2-C to 3-A, I strongly disagree with that.

Yes, but when it comes to leveling the verse, you completely forget this rule. But now that someone plans to downgrade the back, the rule is super needed.

do, but it's to get the verse with its right scales

It's what you consider the right scale, not what others consider. Just look at most of the opinions of the CTR of the Infinite Universe.

we've heard these same arguments a trillion times, the answer is no, we're tired of topics like this.

Before you did the CTRs for Infinite Universe and 2-C Universe, this was something that had already been talked about so many times that a rule was even created because of the repeated arguments. But even so, you asked a staff member to talk to you about it and continue talking about these topics.

Stop that kind of attitude. When downgraded, just refute it and tag the mods for them to see their refurations.

 

[Aachintya31]

Worse than they do, if there are rules it's because literally this has been done millions of times, this will only lead to more repeated topics and trust me, we're already tired of this

we've heard these same arguments a trillion times, the answer is no

These statements are literally opposite

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

Yes, but when it comes to leveling the verse, you completely forget this rule. But now that someone plans to downgrade the back, the rule is super needed.


It's what you consider the right scale, not what others consider. Just look at most of the opinions of the CTR of the Infinite Universe.


Before you did the CTRs for Infinite Universe and 2-C Universe, this was something that had already been talked about so many times that a rule was even created because of the repeated arguments. But even so, you asked a staff member to talk to you about it and continue talking about these topics.

Stop that kind of attitude. When downgraded, just refute it and tag the mods for them to see their refurations.

The rules for updating the Universe to 2-C have already been removed and the infinite Universe too, so we updated our Universe, I'm not to blame if third parties dislike about the Universe being infinite, although the arguments for downgrading the verse are pretty jokes, we are working with precision, none of that is relevant here.

 

[Aachintya31]

The rules for updating the Universe to 2-C have already been removed and the infinite Universe too, so we updated our Universe, I'm not to blame if third parties dislike about the Universe being infinite, although the arguments for downgrading the verse are pretty jokes, we are working with precision, none of that is relevant here.

cosmologies CRTs are still being made . Whether or not they are for upgrades or downgrades, the rule makes no sense.

 

[Phsccarvalho]

cosmologies CRTs are still being made . Whether or not they are for upgrades or downgrades, the rule makes no sense.

True, the rule says that nothing can change, so not even upgrades, but this is happening all the time. I don't think anyone cares about that rule right now.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

cosmologies CRTs are still being made . Whether or not they are for upgrades or downgrades, the rule makes no sense.

The rules make a lot of sense, I don't want to have to put up with a topic with the same arguments 500 times in a row, I think it's totally unnecessary to have repeated topics on such a subject, I think the rules should be kept to not create confusion and that's fine with me.

 

[Aachintya31]

The rules make a lot of sense, I don't want to have to put up with a topic with the same arguments 500 times in a row, I think it's totally unnecessary to have repeated topics on such a subject, I think the rules should be kept to not create confusion and that's fine with me.

STOP MAKING CRTs then. Tf is with your hypocrisy ?

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

STOP MAKING CRTs then. Tf is with your hypocrisy ?

And you don't need to appeal, just because you don't like my topics or comments

 

[StrymULTRA]

If you guys want to allow the (wanked) arguments for 2-C a thing, it's only fair to allow thw 3-A ones allowed too.

 

[Tyranno223]

Rules 2 and 3 are outdated regardless, so they should go.

Rule 1 could do with altering, but it's true that a lot of revisions quite literally repeat the same things. We had a non-godform downgrade for 50th time for the same reason as always in just last week.

 

[Aachintya31]

And you don't need to appeal, just because you don't like my topics or comments

Bro
You make tons of cosmology CRTs but still wants an unnecessary discussion rule for not being able to make cosmology threads??

 

[Phsccarvalho]

If you guys want to allow the (wanked) arguments for 2-C a thing, it's only fair to allow thw 3-A ones allowed too.

You know what's cool? That of 3-A has recently been accepted.

EDIT: Talking about whether or not the universe is infinite.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

You know what's cool? That of 3-A has recently been accepted.

Where? No 3-A was accepted, it was rejected and refuted.

 

[Aachintya31]

Rule 1 could do with altering, but it's true that a lot of revisions quite literally repeat the same things. We had a non-godform downgrade for 50th time for the same reason as always in just last week.

No shit. Upgrade thread got passed like few days ago only and some of them are literally ongoing.

 

[StrymULTRA]

You know what's cool? That of 3-A has recently been accepted.

Yeah. I am not touching myself arguments for the tiering of DB, too much of a mess, unless it's blatantly wrong shit like Tier 1 DBH.

I am just baffled about how hypocrite the DB debaters are, ban topics that downgrade but not the ones for upgrades.

 

[Phsccarvalho]

Where? No 3-A was accepted, it was rejected and refuted.

You must not have seen the EDIT. You're talking about the CRT of the finite universe. He was accepted.

 

[Aachintya31]

Where? No 3-A was accepted, it was rejected and refuted.

Infinite universe thread is accepted and downgraded to finite.

 

[Tyranno223]

No shit. Upgrade thread got passed like few days ago only and some of them are literally ongoing.

Literally unrelated. The non-godform thing has been going on sonce episode 14 came out.

 

[StrymULTRA]

Tbf I feel like the universes should be downgraded back to Low 2-C too but myself am not touching that anymore as I said.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

You must not have seen the EDIT. You're talking about the CRT of the finite universe. He was accepted.

Ata, the infinite Universe being downgraded does not take away the 2-C :

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

Infinite universe thread is accepted and downgraded to finite.

This is a minor thing, when the work has another citation inside, I will bring an update.

 

[Phsccarvalho]

Ata, the infinite Universe being downgraded does not take away the 2-C :

And who is quoting 2-C? I was responding to ULTRA because it said to "leave the 3-A arguments" so I said that a 3-A was accepted for the finite Universe.

 

[KingNanaya]

You know what's cool? That of 3-A has recently been accepted.

EDIT: Talking about whether or not the universe is infinite.

pretty sure it was high 3-A

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

And who is quoting 2-C? I was responding to ULTRA because it said to "leave the 3-A arguments" so I said that a 3-A was accepted for the finite Universe.

Don't get nervous, I understand, bro

 

[StrymULTRA]

pretty sure it was high 3-A

Got downgraded back to 3-A.

Which means that every High 3-A goes back to 3-B iirc.

 

[Phsccarvalho]

Don't get nervous, I understand, bro

Nervous? Why would I be nervous?

 

[Aachintya31]

Ata, the infinite Universe being downgraded does not take away the 2-C :

• Do not attempt to change the current Dragon Ball cosmology and power ratings without new evidence from an ongoing manga or anime series. We have heard all of the arguments many times before, and are so exhausted of constantly dealing with those topics that bringing them up recurrently leads to nowhere, with the discussion threads being oftentimes closed immediately.

This discussion rules prevents any upgrades or downgrades but its useless. that's why it should be removed.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

Nervous? Why would I be nervous?

"And who is quoting 2-C?"

 

[Akagami_Shanks1]

every time i look at the forum dragon ball update comes out, all of them are rejected i accept this proposal

 

[KingNanaya]

• Do not attempt to change the current Dragon Ball cosmology and power ratings without new evidence from an ongoing manga or anime series. We have heard all of the arguments many times before, and are so exhausted of constantly dealing with those topics that bringing them up recurrently leads to nowhere, with the discussion threads being oftentimes closed immediately.

This discussion rules prevents any upgrades or downgrades but its useless. that's why it should be removed.

you know, you kinda right

 

[Phsccarvalho]

"And who is quoting 2-C?"

And where is this nervous? I quoted this because for some reason you quoted 2-C, when I didn't even bring it up. I was just talking about what I was talking about, which was the Universe in particular (not the macrocosm of Universe 7)

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

Rules 2 and 3 are outdated regardless, so they should go.

Rule 1 could do with altering, but it's true that a lot of revisions quite literally repeat the same things. We had a non-godform downgrade for 50th time for the same reason as always in just last week.

That's why we must have rules imposed on the back, such arguments are repeated hundreds of times, just yesterday a user found making DB have another rule about it, repeated topics

 

[Aachintya31]

That's why we must have rules imposed on the back, such arguments are repeated hundreds of times, just yesterday a user found making DB have another rule about it, repeated topics

What do you want ?

 

[StrymULTRA]

What do you want ?

I am just baffled about how hypocrite the DB debaters are, ban topics that downgrade but not the ones for upgrades.