- 4,074
- 4,805
Whatever you are cooking is horrendous.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon ball Discussion Rules Removal
- Thread starter Aachintya31
- Start date
-
- Tags
- discussion rules
- Status
- 6,176
- 2,338
Because goku Gets scared for comedic purposes, so it’s a Pis, not an actual feat
Ped2018
He/Him- 4,609
- 5,242
- 6,176
- 2,338
Now on the other hand, a certain cerealian train being tier 2 is much better
- 9,631
- 10,324
Pfp smh.
- 15,277
- 15,438
To be fair, it’s old as hell and not many people would think “I should probably revise Bulma”
That’s not what PIS means btw
- 5,585
- 6,999
- 15,341
- 11,124
I don't mind removing the first and second but the third can stay in my opinion.
Guacamolefletcher
Username Only- 1,787
- 1,995
I mean tbh it's technically not concluded since they're gonna release the movies and whatnot
The second is a currently accepted feat, in a thread made by Ultima_reality
- 10,153
- 5,032
About the first rule, how about we update it instead of removing it?
In terms of this rule we have many repeated threads of failed attempts to try to downgrade the Universe from DB to 3-A, and we will have one to follow according to the user of the finite Universe, instead of these things continuing to continue over and over again, how about we do we do this with rule 1?
- 9,689
- 3,305
what are you proposing exactly? because what you are saying is already written in the rule
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #94
- 4,482
- 2,819
I don't usually say things like I agree or disagree because I don't trust my own decisions and also because a normal user's vote doesn't matter much, but it can put me in "agree" on this CRT
- 15,341
- 11,124
I know, the rule is outdated...
- 3,163
- 7,800
Both are goddamn irritating ngl however I’m actually in-favor of only banning DB downgrades because it always the same old arguments without any additional proof to debunk the cosmology. No inconsistencies, no contradictory statement, like nothing. Definitely ban the wanking as well if it gets out of hand, but I’ve barely seen any highballing for DB on this wiki since the 2-C upgrade.
- 9,689
- 3,305
You can't ban downgrades in general, that is just silly, and the so called "wank" also uses the same repeated arguments just like the so called "downgrade" also both do not have threads about it often, if anything the "wank" has more over the years
- 3,329
- 4,349
I mean the removal of all 3 rules seem fine but I’m looking for the supposed wank?
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #102
The Low 1-C , 2-B and 2-A ones for canon DB
Though Banning something is an extreme step and should not be implemented for either sides.
- 3,329
- 4,349
Ah okay I thought you guys were calling 2-C wank
But yeah that makes sense now and I’m fine with it as well
- 9,689
- 3,305
Tbh it was back in the day, but that is irrelevant now that it is accepted so, meh
- 3,329
- 4,349
Never was.
Just because it wasn’t accepted doesn’t mean it’s wank
- 29,889
- 30,897
Just so anyone notices, the discussion rules against certain upgrades has "Without new evidence" as the key phrase where as some of the ones people wanted to make against certain downgrades has more to do with arguing out of ignorance against some basically face value evidence of a noticeable jump in power.
- 9,689
- 3,305
it was considered wank, i don't think it is with the new evidence tho
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #108
- 9,689
- 3,305
- 4,482
- 2,819
Hey Aachintya31 can you add me under "agree"
- 4,482
- 2,819
What is missing for this to be accepted?
- 9,689
- 3,305
nothing, 3 staff aproval, 48hrs have passed, this is accepted
- 4,482
- 2,819
So I guess this can be added (or removed because it's removing stuff) and then closed.
- 3,329
- 4,349
Fair enough
- 10,153
- 5,032
This pettiness with the Universe being infinite or being 2-C is incredibly unnecessary, bro
- 3,163
- 7,800
I’m sure DB upgrades was banned when Goku was Low 2-C because of the same plea. The unreasonable and repetitive wank on DB has plummeted nowadays now we’re being surged with downgrade threads. Let’s just see how it’ll work out, if it gets out of hand we might have to reinstate rule 3.
- 3,163
- 7,800
I’m sure something like that is banned for every franchise out there, not only DB
- 9,689
- 3,305
If they keep repeating the same arguments over and over then of course
Ped2018
He/Him- 4,609
- 5,242
- 4,482
- 2,819
And then?
- Status
Similar threads
