- 2,703
- 2,482
That's fair, but I maintain that a ban should still be on certain topics that get repeated too much.
Downgrading non-god forms or upgrading based on time-skip breaking, that sort of stuff.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon ball Discussion Rules Removal
- Thread starter Aachintya31
- Start date
-
- Tags
- discussion rules
- Status
Downgrading non-god forms or upgrading based on time-skip breaking, that sort of stuff.
- 4,482
- 2,819
When the wave of cosmology upgrades started, you had to see it, a marvel. People accepting and etc. Now came a downgrade CRT and now DB is hated again and only accepted by Hate. The world is funny.
- 2,703
- 2,482
Why do DB discussions always have this issue. Stay cordial guys, before a mod comes in.
- 3,105
- 3,164
There literally was a discussion rule that prevented DBS from going past Low 2-C. Let's not be hypocrites,at least.
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #46
- 7,076
- 12,744
@LephyrTheRevanchist @LordGriffin1000 what do you guys think?
- 3,105
- 3,164
So what? I'm responding to those who accused DB fans of hypocrisy. Nothing else.
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #50
The hypocrisy comes from making upgrade threads and not letting get rid of the discussion rules which prevents making those threads.
Guacamolefletcher
Username Only- 1,787
- 1,995
This is the issue with saying "debunked." The mindset that an argument is "debunked" results in people not actually thinking.
- 9,691
- 3,307
Tbh the rules were always stupid, if you don't even bother to link said arguments that were repeated over and over how could anyone know which arguments were used to make new ones? The rules are kind of useless without it tbh, i agree with this
Guacamolefletcher
Username Only- 1,787
- 1,995
actually, no longer agree. Reinstate the rule about not changing the current db cosmology.
- 9,691
- 3,307
If the rules are not even linking or saying which arguments were brought up over and ovet why should it still exist the way it does?
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,610
- 3,605
If I haven't said this already, I agree
- 4,074
- 4,805
Just remove the rule and propose new rules for bad repeatedly tried and failed topics and actually linking CRT's as well. So basically I agree.
- 29,889
- 30,897
The 1st one is outdated since the Anime has been concluded for now and is no longer on going atm.
The 2nd one is also outdated since Super Buu was upgraded and GT cast accordingly + having their own feats too.
3rd one I am a bit conflicted; I obviously want to avoid people trying to upgrade Krillin or Tien to 2-C, but 18 and Ribrianne have been upgraded recently yes.
The 2nd one is also outdated since Super Buu was upgraded and GT cast accordingly + having their own feats too.
3rd one I am a bit conflicted; I obviously want to avoid people trying to upgrade Krillin or Tien to 2-C, but 18 and Ribrianne have been upgraded recently yes.
- 3,163
- 7,800
Ad nausea smfh
I agree to remove the first and second rule but rule three definitely must stay for obvious reasons
I agree to remove the first and second rule but rule three definitely must stay for obvious reasons
- 3,163
- 7,800
Yea because same arguments recur, real ad nauseam
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #61
Krillin and 18 got upgraded recently . These roles are joke
- 29,679
- 24,579
I get the feeling that some people wouldn't stop until even Puar and Oolong are 2-C.
- 3,163
- 7,800
Well, do you have any evidence to downgrade the verse yourself? Same old goddamn arguments unlike actual propositions introduced to support 2-C DB
- 12,425
- 4,539
Not worth my time if this wiki wanks the hell out of DB using excuses and fanboyism with stonewalling too.
- 4,074
- 4,805
- 12,425
- 4,539
This is why Tier 2 base Goku is dumb, it leads to stupid stuff like this fr.
- 3,163
- 7,800
- 3,163
- 7,800
They’re not gonna stop until Saibaman and Yamcha becomes 1-A
- 3,163
- 7,800
Tier 2 base Goku is tier 2 SSG Goku, I see nothing wrong with that
- 7,076
- 12,744
Implying Yamcha isn't obviously Tier 0.
- 15,277
- 15,438
How about you chill out, hm?
Anyway, I agree with the OP, I was actually gonna make a thread like this myself. The third rule can stay if it’s deemed necessary, but it shouldn’t be that hard to debunk a CRT trying to scale like, random fodder #700 to 2-C because they punched Goku one time.
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #72
- 5,585
- 6,999
I agree with this thread.
So you're telling me we can't get 2-C Bulma for slapping base Goku?
- 2,126
- 1,724
- Thread starter
- #74
And tanking beerus slap.So you're telling me we can't get 2-C Bulma for slapping base Goku?
- 15,277
- 15,438
Oh no, Bulma objectively scales above Beerus. /sSo you're telling me we can't get 2-C Bulma for slapping base Goku?
- 10,153
- 5,032
Does Bulma have a profile, bro?
- 15,277
- 15,438
- 10,153
- 5,032
This is so cute lol
- 29,679
- 24,579
Yeesh, those aren't good justifications on her profile.
- Status
Similar threads
