- 12,085
- 2,094
Ehhhhh.
I would wish for a good profile to stay here, but it's against the rules:
Cut Link
I would wish for a good profile to stay here, but it's against the rules:
Cut Link
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Deleting composite link
- Thread starter The_pen_or_the_sword
- Start date
-
- Tags
- the legend of zelda
- 8,531
- 8,932
This is not a hill i want to die on, so take my following idea with a grain of salt.
I can kinda understand Cal's pain of a beloved and iconic page being deleted so i thought of a idea how to adhere to the new composite ruling (which i agree to, sorry Cal), while still giving Cal a small consolation. If "exceptions" for individuals or small groups are something youre against then skip this post, as i dont want to waste peoples time.
My proposal is: Have only ONE Link page, with every game iteration of him being a tabbered page. Thanks to the tabbers in tabbers function you can find one pages like Oven's Magnum Opus or mine Magnus Opus, we can use tabbers to divide entire pages in a single page. This is something i saw some users utilisize in their Sandboxes, having multiple pages worth of code neatly packed within a single Sandbox. I cant recall someone who did that on the spot, so if someone who uses that method happend to read this post, please post a link to your sandbox to serve as a example. Worst come worst i will write up a example myself later.
Obviously, this is different from our standards for profiles, but considering that this dosnt violate our standard, i think this is worth considering. Now to pros and cons and ehs.
Pro:
We wont have to clutter the wiki with dozens of Link profiles that people wont care about but dont violate any of our standards for fiction that are allowed to have profiles here. As every iteration of Link is on a single page, without being composite, this boosts the notory of those Link versions, as visitors who arent familiar with them dont have to look them up seperatly.
Cal is allowed some shred of happiness. The visitor numbers for Link wont get divided, without compromising our composite rules. Additionally, the codes for each iterations can be found on a single profile, making versewide revisions (Do they happen for Link? I dont know) slightly easier, as people dont have to fish up every single page to apply changes to them.
Cons:
The code for TabbersInTabbers is a bit more complex than your typical code you can find on every page. I failed multiple times to apply it correctly before Ogbunabali teached me the correct way, so not everyone can use it on the spot.
The Page Code would be preetty massive, as it features multiple entire pages worth of codes in a single code page, making revisions for single iterations kinda annoying. This can be bypassed by using the F3 key to search for specific iterations by simply searching for the name of said iteration, but this is still a con.
Ricsi-viragosi wrote:
Again, I see absolutely no difference in one profile with twenty tabbers or that many profiles, beyond the fact that tabbers (especially with long names like the game of origin) easily start overlapping with one another, making for a just as cluttered feeling look.
Ehs:
Due to Link being a single page, ALL discussions regarding every Link will be featured in the discussion section. This might be great for hard experts of TLoZ but might be annoying for people who only support certain iterations. This point is both a pro and a con so its "Eh".
Thanks for reading this proposal. Wether you find this idea good or not is not a battle i will fight. I have no say on this topic as i dont really care what happens with the page, as long as it adheres to our rules and this proposal is something i came up with out of friendship with Cal. Wether Cal himself likes the idea or not is another matter lol.
I can kinda understand Cal's pain of a beloved and iconic page being deleted so i thought of a idea how to adhere to the new composite ruling (which i agree to, sorry Cal), while still giving Cal a small consolation. If "exceptions" for individuals or small groups are something youre against then skip this post, as i dont want to waste peoples time.
My proposal is: Have only ONE Link page, with every game iteration of him being a tabbered page. Thanks to the tabbers in tabbers function you can find one pages like Oven's Magnum Opus or mine Magnus Opus, we can use tabbers to divide entire pages in a single page. This is something i saw some users utilisize in their Sandboxes, having multiple pages worth of code neatly packed within a single Sandbox. I cant recall someone who did that on the spot, so if someone who uses that method happend to read this post, please post a link to your sandbox to serve as a example. Worst come worst i will write up a example myself later.
Obviously, this is different from our standards for profiles, but considering that this dosnt violate our standard, i think this is worth considering. Now to pros and cons and ehs.
Pro:
We wont have to clutter the wiki with dozens of Link profiles that people wont care about but dont violate any of our standards for fiction that are allowed to have profiles here. As every iteration of Link is on a single page, without being composite, this boosts the notory of those Link versions, as visitors who arent familiar with them dont have to look them up seperatly.
Cal is allowed some shred of happiness. The visitor numbers for Link wont get divided, without compromising our composite rules. Additionally, the codes for each iterations can be found on a single profile, making versewide revisions (Do they happen for Link? I dont know) slightly easier, as people dont have to fish up every single page to apply changes to them.
Cons:
The code for TabbersInTabbers is a bit more complex than your typical code you can find on every page. I failed multiple times to apply it correctly before Ogbunabali teached me the correct way, so not everyone can use it on the spot.
The Page Code would be preetty massive, as it features multiple entire pages worth of codes in a single code page, making revisions for single iterations kinda annoying. This can be bypassed by using the F3 key to search for specific iterations by simply searching for the name of said iteration, but this is still a con.
Ricsi-viragosi wrote:
Again, I see absolutely no difference in one profile with twenty tabbers or that many profiles, beyond the fact that tabbers (especially with long names like the game of origin) easily start overlapping with one another, making for a just as cluttered feeling look.
Ehs:
Due to Link being a single page, ALL discussions regarding every Link will be featured in the discussion section. This might be great for hard experts of TLoZ but might be annoying for people who only support certain iterations. This point is both a pro and a con so its "Eh".
Thanks for reading this proposal. Wether you find this idea good or not is not a battle i will fight. I have no say on this topic as i dont really care what happens with the page, as long as it adheres to our rules and this proposal is something i came up with out of friendship with Cal. Wether Cal himself likes the idea or not is another matter lol.
- 26,116
- 3,649
Weren't tabbers advised not to be used that much because they are anti-phone users (they can just, like, use desktop mode, but Google still doesn't like it sl rip).
Again, I see absolutely no difference in one profile with twenty tabbers or that many profiles, beyond the fact that tabbers (especially with long names like the game of origin) easily start overlapping with one another, making for a just as cluttered feeling look.
Again, I see absolutely no difference in one profile with twenty tabbers or that many profiles, beyond the fact that tabbers (especially with long names like the game of origin) easily start overlapping with one another, making for a just as cluttered feeling look.
- 8,531
- 8,932
This is definitly a good point, so i will add this to the cons.Ricsi-viragosi said:
- 15,918
- 2,681
Add me on nuke the rest list, seems more reasonable to not have such a clutter fest of profiles.
- 15,726
- 7,715
Starter Pack recently deleted the Composite Link profile.
Again, if people want the save file to work with, here is a sandbox I created with the source code: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Elizhaa/Link_(Composite)
Is there anything left to do here?
Again, if people want the save file to work with, here is a sandbox I created with the source code: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Elizhaa/Link_(Composite)
Is there anything left to do here?
Dust_Collector
They/Them- 7,147
- 7,176
I don't think there's anything else left to do here except also getting rid of Princess Zelda, no reason for her profile to stay.
- 15,918
- 2,681
Zelda needs to be split into the only incarnations that matter (since most of them don't matter on a vs debating point of view), which are: Shiek, Tetra, Twilight Princess, and Spirit Tracks Zelda.
Dust_Collector
They/Them- 7,147
- 7,176
How have you, Cal, and DDM brought up all the different Zeldas that matter and not mention BOTW Zelda?
- 30,087
- 31,393
Oh yeah, Breath of the Wild Zelda. Though, not sure what physical feats she has, but I know she distracted Calamity Ganon.
Dust_Collector
They/Them- 7,147
- 7,176
I've actually been working on a profile for her. Physically she has no feats, best I could come up with is scaling her to the average Hylian, but with Magic she's 5-A.
- 15,726
- 7,715
I agree her profile should be deleted; it was already agreed from the composite thread that her profile will have the same fate as composite Link's. I will handled the deletion and the link's update.
Here her save profile's source code, for those who want it: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Elizhaa/Princess_Zelda
Here her save profile's source code, for those who want it: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Elizhaa/Princess_Zelda
- 40,446
- 12,915
Nah I have one more thing to say.
- 334
- 64
OOF, comp link was about to have another win against spawn too
(rip all his victories)
(rip all his victories)
- 31
- 0
R.I.P Composite Link and Zelda
- 63,487
- 8,486
Rip the one dude who can defeat Full Power Dante
- 31
- 0
Yeah ;-;Schnee One said:
- 19,368
- 9,961
Schnee One said:
- 12,085
- 2,094
Novel Kars:Schnee One said:
Am I a joke to you
- 8,626
- 2,743
Daddy Kars stomped tho, it wasn't even a fight
- 3,460
- 1,717
Yeetus Deletus
- 12,085
- 2,094
Also, RIP to an amazing profile for an amazing character. You will join VS Battles heaven with Composite Human
- 1,826
- 366
I don't get why Kirby can have one of the biggest and most painful pages to scroll through on this entire site, but Link can't have a composite profile :/
- 63,487
- 8,486
Is Kirby a composite?ChocomilkAlex said:
- 8,266
- 1,395
I don't get why the Garfield profile hasn't been split into Cartoons and Comics yet
- 12,085
- 2,094
No, all of his feats come from the games, and unlike Link, they are all the same KirbySchnee One said:
- 63,487
- 8,486
Then Kirby is fine
- 3,256
- 1,285
Because Kirby's not a composite? Unless I'm missing something, Canon Kirby went through all the adventures himself to get those feats, powers, powerups and items. It's the exact same Kirby going through all those games and events. Link is reincarnating into many different versions with distinct histories, equipment, and powers with no recallection of his previous selves.ChocomilkAlex said:
- 8,266
- 1,395
BigSmoke4269 said:
- 5,322
- 432
- Thread starter
- #157
Hmm Ill make a thread on this later if someone else doesn'tBigSmoke4269 said:
- 1,826
- 366
So what does this mean for other composite profiles?
- 1,826
- 366
The only reason I was against deleting composite Link is because there are now tons of different pages with similar stats and abilities. I was in favor of combining every Link into a bunch of different keys. The only problem I found with this is that it would be a massive page, and considering the zelda timeline, a lot of the keys wouldn't be in a typical descending order. That's why I brought up Kirby, because his page is MASSIVE. I feel like we should combine Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask together because Majora Mask takes place directly after Ocarina of Time.
- 63,487
- 8,486
DeathChocomilkAlex said:
Similar threads
