- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #121
Let's not turn this into a Gravity Falls vs Sonic flame war please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^Dziga said:Remember when we could finish a CRT in civilized and peaceful manner?
bill is omnipotent so ofc he can do that (Inb4 someone takes this seriously)Inverted Tempest said:He's a real threat to the Multiverse that contains infinite realities by destroying one at a time, that logic is totally flawless tbh.
What do you mean by this?Hykuu said:refer to this, also the term "threat" in here can again be him turning the entire multiverse into a state of weirdmageddon, or having absolute control over it, hence the term "wider" mutliverse, also, he liberated the entire 2nd dimension, we can assume off that he's planning to do that to the 3rd and 4th, right? which obviously isn't possible if we go off the "wrecking havoc one by one" idea.
Bill orignates from the 2nd dimension, and he described it as flat.Ogbunabali said:If the second dimension is a place that you can "go to" and "liberate" it, like it is its own realm, then it probably isn't using the word "dimension" in spacial dimension way, rather the alternate universe way.
Yes because being a threat to a infinite amount of universes makes sense if you take 3 at a time, you'll surely destroy the infinite multiverse in no time!Saikou The Lewd King said:Being a threat to a collection of X doesn't mean you're able to threaten the entire collection of X at once.
This could easily mean that Bill is just able to potentially threaten any universes in the multiverse, not that he's able to threaten ALL of them. Difference between "everything" and "anything". Doesn't help that "threat" is still extremely vague and does not carry any connotation of complete space-time destruction.
I wasn't using the time baby statement but okShadowWarrior1999 said:Also Gravity Falls uses dimensions to refer to universes and spatial ones. Assuming Bill would takeover the entire 4th dimension is extrapolation and going by the highest possible interpretation when the context from Time Baby's statement is that dimension in this case refers to the universe.
it's a dorito with a top hat conquering the multiverse, ya think real life dimensions are a important detail when they are making this shit?Ogbunabali said:Yeah, but that's not how dimensions work in real life is all I'm saying. He may originate form a universe that's only 2D, but he can't originate from the second dimension.
We've already explained why that's openly irrelevant, he might as well have to be 2-A to actually be considered a threat to it.ShadowWarrior1999 said:Here's the thing. Bill is never stated to be able to destroy the entire multiverse. He's only a threat to it.
That's not really an excuse.Hykuu said:it's a dorito with a top hat conquering the multiverse, ya think real life dimensions are a important detail when they are making this shit?
How is it being fiction and not being 100% accurate to how reallife would describe something, not be a good reasoning? Bill describes the dimension as flat and you can see from the fact that his shape represents a triangle, a 2 dimensional object, that he's suspposed to be a 2nd dimensional being. Everything you've argued thus far is nitpicking something. Occam's razor. He's stated to come from the 2nd dimension and descrbies it as flat, it's referring to a spatial dimension.Ogbunabali said:That's not really an excuse.
Well actually.Inverted Tempest said:I will have to agree with Hykuu here honestly.
Bill could be destroying like 10^100 amount of universes at once and he still isn't going to be a true threat to the Multiverse if it's infinite. Because common sense should dictate we assume the fact he's outright 2-A for it. If an author is going to write "threat to the multiverse," where it's consistent there are infinite universes, what do you think the logical thought process would be? Assuming that he destroys arbitrary universes at once which wouldn't even matter in the signature scheme of things because that number of infinity will never decrease or the general idea that Bill will actually destroy all of it in its entirety if he's not stopped. Literally, the only way around that would be arguing something like Infinite Duplication hax which is something Bill clearly doesn't have, so the logical conclusion we draw is he's 2-A.
Beacuse it completely contradicts how this entire site works. If we handwaved everything with "it's fiction" then we'd be a laughing stock.GiverOfThePeace said:How is it being fiction and not being 100% accurate to how reallife would describe something, not be a good reasoning? Bill describes the dimension as flat and you can see from the fact that his shape represents a triangle, a 2 dimensional object, that he's suspposed to be a 2nd dimensional being. Everything you've argued thus far is nitpicking something. Occam's razor. He's stated to come from the 2nd dimension and descrbies it as flat, it's referring to a spatial dimension.Ogbunabali said:That's not really an excuse.
Can't we just "At least Low 2-C, possibly 2-A" the heck out of it and call it a day?
So did you ignore most of the comment where I mentioned why "it's fiction" can work here?The Wright Way said:Beacuse it completely contradicts how this entire site works. If we handwaved everything with "it's fiction" then we'd be a laughing stock.
Maybe, not seeing any promosing arguments against 2-A thoGabrielMaster721 said:Can't we just "At least Low 2-C, possibly 2-A" the heck out of it and call it a day?
That infinite thing is actually referring to his time in the nightmare/mind realm. So that has nothing to do with his true form.ShadowWarrior1999 said: