- 3,662
- 275
That's already being questioned again right now. Hold up now for the time being.ZeedKrakenZilla said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Debunking Bill Cipher's 2-A tier + Axolotl downgrade
- Thread starter ShadowWarrior1999
- Start date
- Status
- 2,334
- 326
agree Drago Bill apply 2-A to scales now.
- 5,530
- 876
If Bill actually becomes solid 2-A then I'm coming with that CRT to make the Kirbyverse High 3-A
- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #484
@Genericstickman He won't be.
I assume I can put you under "Agree?"
I assume I can put you under "Agree?"
- 85
- 17
Put me under Agree.
- 14,195
- 2,574
You guys keep saying Occam's Razor but for some reason, you guys haven't actually applied it.
For example @Inverted
"To Bill, it's just a game, but to us, it would mean the end of our world."
Not only does this not imply absolutely anything about multiverse or universe busting, which is what you guys are arguing but occam's razor suggests that if it's like a game, wouldn't he be playing around? Your example would suggest that, and it would be against occam's razor that unlike a game, he would just end it all at once.
2nd statement:
The point was that threatening something does not entail actually destroying the entire thing. And again, spreading chaos can be stated as destruction and again using occam's razor we've seen the former significantly more often than the latter. Coincidently the Metroid universe is, in fact, infinite too.
TL;DR: Your quote does not state destruction via universe or multiverse busting as 'end of the world' literally means anything from life-wiping to chaos inevitably killing off humans, and ironically occam's razor states that if Bill thinks it's like a game, then he probably wouldn't end it immediately. And even now all the DBZ examples (Since destruction is their main method) would be rated 3-A and Kirby as well(ish).
@Elizhaa ??? I don't have a problem with statements, just ones with improper evidence to support it, which the wiki has always never used.
For example @Inverted
"To Bill, it's just a game, but to us, it would mean the end of our world."
Not only does this not imply absolutely anything about multiverse or universe busting, which is what you guys are arguing but occam's razor suggests that if it's like a game, wouldn't he be playing around? Your example would suggest that, and it would be against occam's razor that unlike a game, he would just end it all at once.
2nd statement:
The point was that threatening something does not entail actually destroying the entire thing. And again, spreading chaos can be stated as destruction and again using occam's razor we've seen the former significantly more often than the latter. Coincidently the Metroid universe is, in fact, infinite too.
TL;DR: Your quote does not state destruction via universe or multiverse busting as 'end of the world' literally means anything from life-wiping to chaos inevitably killing off humans, and ironically occam's razor states that if Bill thinks it's like a game, then he probably wouldn't end it immediately. And even now all the DBZ examples (Since destruction is their main method) would be rated 3-A and Kirby as well(ish).
@Elizhaa ??? I don't have a problem with statements, just ones with improper evidence to support it, which the wiki has always never used.
- 3,662
- 275
Again, SomebodyData making all the more sense
- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #488
SomebodyData is the man.
- 14,195
- 2,574
And 1 more thing, since I'm starting to think no one even read what the supporting quote is:
"To Bill, it's just a game, but to us, it would mean the end of our world."
This right here, is the evidence. Give ya a second to think about how often an event is stated to be a "it would mean the end of our world."
"To Bill, it's just a game, but to us, it would mean the end of our world."
This right here, is the evidence. Give ya a second to think about how often an event is stated to be a "it would mean the end of our world."
- 3,691
- 3,460
SomebodyData is putting some sense into this debate
- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #491
I should mention this is getting pretty close to 500 comments.
- 2,907
- 1,111
- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #493
Nice.
- 12,524
- 3,492
- Thread starter
- #494
Can a staff close this as a second thread continuing the topic has been made?
- Status
Similar threads
