• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dceu faora and Nam-ek should not scale to Clark

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's more a calc member question. Usually for V. FRAG though the majority of the structure must be completely shattered into fragments rather than a small amount.
 
I'll ask a CGM for that then
 
That's more a calc member question. Usually for V. FRAG though the majority of the structure must be completely shattered into fragments rather than a small amount.
For v. frag the fragments must be considerably small compared to the original volume, yes.

However, I am not sure if such a feat like this can be standardized. Not all mountains are built the same nor do they share the same cone profile.
 
For v. frag the fragments must be considerably small compared to the original volume, yes.

However, I am not sure if such a feat like this can be standardized. Not all mountains are built the same nor do they share the same cone profile.
Hmm well that said thanks for your input on the calc it is appreciated. Has the feat been regularly calculated before(Superman's i mean)?
 
For v. frag the fragments must be considerably small compared to the original volume, yes.

However, I am not sure if such a feat like this can be standardized. Not all mountains are built the same nor do they share the same cone profile.
While that could be true that mountain's vary a lot in size, but the main reason why this common feat was requested was because literally no one else bothered to calc the actual impact feat which Supes endured crashing into. So technically we kinda had no choice
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top