- 3,562
- 641
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do realize that Esdeath has destroyed more armies then we've seen. Cinder brought down a kingdom with preparation. Esdeath just goes in and slaughters.Xmark12 said:Cinder is faster than Esdeath, being MHS after-all. Both may also be equally strategic, Esdeath being a general that can command an army while Cinder being a tactician that brought down a freakin kingdom. So this could go either way really.
The only speed feat cited in Cinder page is blocking Ruby shots. But there is no reason to think it's not aim dodging (or aim-blocking to be precise). So when has Cinder showed MHS ?Lionrp said:I'd say Cinder wins in both due to having superior stats in pretty much every area, particularly speed as she is MHS while Esdeath is HHS. The only thing Esdeath has as an advantage is her time stop that can be negated through cold resistance and possibly extreme heat such as that produced by lava dust. So Esdeath doesn't really stand a chance as she is blitzed, and overpowered greatly.
Cinder is scaled to Mercury Black who dodged lightning.MasterChefTony said:The only speed feat cited in Cinder page is blocking Ruby shots. But there is no reason to think it's not aim dodging (or aim-blocking to be precise). So when has Cinder showed MHS ?
again, lightning from 6 meters from the ground?Crazystarf said:There is a specific feat in regards to Esdeath that may change the tip here. I suggest people wait before giving inputs on this battle.
And we haven't see all of Cinder can doDrellix said:I'm going to say we have not seen Esdeath at her best. Does anyone understand she CREATES her trump cards. And she's listed as at least City Block. That was years back. She's obviously a lot stronger considering she pushed back evolved Incursio.
She 'could', but she can't at the moment have what she's never shown as we go by feats.Drellix said:Not saying she can come up with it on the spot. I'm saying she could have a lot more in her arsenal.
KaenDragneel123 said:again, lightning from 6 meters from the ground?Crazystarf said:There is a specific feat in regards to Esdeath that may change the tip here. I suggest people wait before giving inputs on this battle.
Esdeath's versatility isn't enough to stop her from getting one shotted and or blitzed given that none of her powers are effective against even base cinder.Gemmysaur said:Creating a trump card can't be done in the heat of battle. Incursio Tats only managed to keep up with Esdeath via Evolved form, his original one wasn't doing much, so I don't think she got stronger. She only got craftier with her powers.
R1: Esdesu via versatility of powers.
R2: Cinder via hotstuff pushing the limits of Esdeath's cool.
Cinder is Mach 300+ in base thoughLionrp said:Ah, my mistake. Still, looking at the current calc, Akame and Esdeath dodged at mach 42, still far below the mach 224 of base cinder.
You can't be seriousMasterChefTony said:How can you say how fast were the lighting in both cases ?
Why is everybody supposing that the characters are incredibly fast and not that is the lighting to be incredibly slow ?
I'm absolutely serious.KaenDragneel123 said:You can't be seriousMasterChefTony said:How can you say how fast were the lighting in both cases ?
Why is everybody supposing that the characters are incredibly fast and not that is the lighting to be incredibly slow ?
We have characters dodging lighting, wich is impossible in the real world. So the lighting is slower, or the people is faster or both. Why have you choosen the 2nd ? If fictional worlds have fictional phisics how can you be sure that lighting works the same ?Crazystarf said:For here we use the lightning speed of 440km/s, or ~Mach 1290, assuming it is cloud-to-ground lightning. Remember that this value is constant and does not change.
Also, since fictional characters break the rules of physics sometimes, I guess we can overlook situations that break the laws of physics a bit, I guess.
Except that to have people move sideways at mach 40 you have to change how thrust works. This means change the Newton's laws of motion, that are the foundation of physics. Changing these laws would make a very different universe.LordKill90908 said:That requires the least assumptions. If we assume lightning is slower than in real world, we must also assume that other physical constants can be different, rendering calcs pointless as we need all physical constants to be explicitly stated. Here, we need to assume that physical constants are as in the real world unless otherwise stated.
Furthermore, considering that superhuman speed and reflexes are explicitly stated in series as a product of aura, it's safe to conclude that they are faster.
Here stays the fallacy. You have applied real phisics to the lighting and not to the thrust. Why ? Because the characters have dodged bullets ? You don't even need to be supesonic to dodge bullets.Crazystarf said:So, my thoughts on this is that unless the speed of lightning is actually given, we assume that the lightning moves at actual lightning speed. If we see a character dodge that lightning bolt, we assume that the character in question has actually dodged that lightning bolt unless shown otherwise (aimdodging).
Applying real life physics entirely in a fictional universe brings more questions than answers, so we just analyze what is shown and roll with it, I guess.