- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #121
Yea, the OP says "Santa Claus (Night state)" so It should be good, but overall do you agree with the OP?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Chainsaw Man Upgrades
- Thread starter GunshyFever
- Start date
- Status
Zabazab
Any/All- 3,832
- 4,946
Yeah sure I agree.
You can add the scan from chapter 75 saying "Fearing and strengthening Makima is nothing less than the history of humanity." if you wanna cement how feared she is.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #123
A fear scaling category has been added, as well as fear scaling feats for Makima and Santa
Your vote has also been added
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #125
Should I count this as a vote?
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #127
Reminder that the OP has changed
Admins please revisit this thread
Admins please revisit this thread
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #128
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #129
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #130
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #131
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #132
Bump
- 4,955
- 3,768
You probably have to go the admin’s profile wall and ask for them personally to review this thread again, or ask a mod to @ people to the thread
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #134
Oh, thank you for the suggestion
- 11,247
- 13,132
I thought the calculation was dropped? Or to be more accurate the pulverization end was rejected? I don't know where you're getting 21.38 Tons from, since I never got that for his durability. And my method of using the inverse square law in the comment I think you're using is incorrect anyway, which is why I didn't add it to the blog.
The general scaling in the OP looks alright to me, but I'd like to understand the numbers.
The general scaling in the OP looks alright to me, but I'd like to understand the numbers.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #136
That's a mistake on my part as I've gotten the scaling of your previous message on the first page of the thread
If I'm correct it should be around 18 tons of the attack which denji took
^ this was the mistake I originally made by placing it in the OP
Apart from that I'm glad the scaling seems fit
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #137
That's strange, on the calc I thought the pulv end was accepted? I will re-check and make adjustments if needed
- 11,247
- 13,132
This was said here and it seems like SeijiSetto agreed with this sentiment.
He said that after taking a second look he rejected it.
Or am I missing something here?
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #139
He was talking about the original OP calc (8-A+) which had results too close to the Gun devils feat (the Bat Devils calc by Phantom)
You replaced it with your current calc which is now accepted (the pulv end) and being used
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #140
In less confusing words SeijiSetto told passerby that he had already rejected the original OP bat devil calc, not yours so everything should be alright
- 11,247
- 13,132
Ah, I see.
Well still my version of the calculation in the blog is 8 Tons and not 8-B, the one in my comments was not evaluated and is incorrect anyway as stated by Seiji earlier on. I was doing the inverse square law wrong there and when explained I realized that this law cannot be applied to this kind of attack.
Denji's Durability should be downscaling from the 8 Tons of TNT results instead.
Well still my version of the calculation in the blog is 8 Tons and not 8-B, the one in my comments was not evaluated and is incorrect anyway as stated by Seiji earlier on. I was doing the inverse square law wrong there and when explained I realized that this law cannot be applied to this kind of attack.
Denji's Durability should be downscaling from the 8 Tons of TNT results instead.
The attack spreads forward in the shape of a cone, the sides of the cone are completely irrelevant since that's just the area the energy passes through, it doesn't stay or spread inside that area. Which means only the cone's circle/base area matters and that area is the same as the building destruction's area.
The inverse square law cannot be used in this case to find the Bat Devil's AP since the destroyed part is across the entire area of the attack and not a small part of it.
That's why that calculation in the comments is wrong and is why I didn't put it in the OP.
The inverse square law cannot be used in this case to find the Bat Devil's AP since the destroyed part is across the entire area of the attack and not a small part of it.
That's why that calculation in the comments is wrong and is why I didn't put it in the OP.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #142
Alright, in that case I will make the adjustments to the OP
- 2,301
- 2,070
That's more a fault of the inverse-square formulae we use not taking energy loss into account, all it calculates is how much energy is spread out.
So the Bat Devil's attack having as much energy at the epicenter as it does at its edge (due to the energy being applied across its entire area) is just a quirk of that fact.
- 11,247
- 13,132
Well that's because it's meant to be applied to things that spread out from a center point. Here the energy is propelled forward and spreads out into a wider circular area, calculating energy loss as it goes forward would be something vastly different from the inverse square law which could only do what I said above.
I'm not best at describing what I'm thinking.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #145
The OP has been updated accordingly with the correct values
- 11,247
- 13,132
Yeah, all of that in the OP looks fine to me.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #147
Counted
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #148
Bump
- 21,468
- 30,790
Looks solid now
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #150
Counted
- 3,684
- 2,320
I can agree with the newly updated scaling. It's clear that Pochita even in his weakened state was still superior to the rest of the hybrids, though still not strong enough to be completely unfazed by their attacks and was eventually defeated by their combined efforts. So High 8-C to 8-B for the characters should be good for now. Until we're shown more feats from the hybrids in the future.
Last edited:
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #152
Counted
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #153
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #154
Bump
- 16,998
- 12,134
Looks good but the scans you used are pretty booty in terms of quality. I wouldn't use those particular scans in the profile due to how rough they look, just find another manga site with high quality scans and use those instead.
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #156
All bad quality manga panels have been replaced
- 16,998
- 12,134
Much betterAll bad quality manga panels have been replaced
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #158
CountedMuch better
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #159
Bump
- 1,499
- 978
- Thread starter
- #160
Bump
- Status
Similar threads
