- 9,264
- 3,401
well the rules are rulesThat is bullshit. You might also say "destroying 1 trillion infinite multiverses is as impressive as destroying one multiverse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well the rules are rulesThat is bullshit. You might also say "destroying 1 trillion infinite multiverses is as impressive as destroying one multiverse.
Then why say Goku AP stomps if it isn't impressive? No logic so far from you.Surprise~ it's actually isn't more impressive than destroying one multiverse, in terms of AP at least.
cuz goku scales way higher in to 2-aThen why say Goku AP stomps if it isn't impressive? No logic so far from you.
What rules?well the rules are rules
where it says having a larger 2A cosmology no longer grants you anything above baseline 2A unless the verse treats it as so apperantlyWhat rules?
It isn't impressive since destroying 1 trillion multiverses is the same as destroying one multiverse. So SPOM and CC Goku are equal in AP. Duhcuz goku scales way higher in to 2-a
if he is then goku prob just wins by outskilling and dodging everything superman throwsIt isn't impressive since destroying 1 trillion multiverses is the same as destroying one multiverse. So SPOM and CC Goku are equal in AP. Duh
I am not talking about a larger 2A cosmology, but about separate 2-A multiverses.where it says having a larger 2A cosmology no longer grants you anything above baseline 2A unless the verse treats it as so apperantly
You can't refute me?Just ignore San-Kakarot, it's well known that he's a troll
By your logic Low 2-C and 2-C are the same.if he is then goku prob just wins by outskilling and dodging everything superman throws
So Zeno's feat when he destroyed the 12 universes is as impressive when BoG SSG Goku was destroying U7. Lol ok.Because it threats it as infinite.
Destroying infinite mass twice is still destroying infinite mass.
?????? what does my comment have to do with tiering? i just said goku outskills and dodges everything superman throws at himBy your logic Low 2-C and 2-C are the same.
Because you said 'No matter how many universes you destroy at once it is just impressive as destroying as one".?????? what does my comment have to do with tiering? i just said goku outskills and dodges everything superman throws at him
i literally never said thatBecause you said 'No matter how many universes you destroy at once it is just impressive as destroying as one".
This is not Low 2-C vs 2-C, it is 2-A vs 2-A, your logic is invalidBy your logic Low 2-C and 2-C are the same.
I am not saying SPOM or that Goku wins. I simply disagreed with his poor understanding of 2-A.This is not Low 2-C vs 2-C, it is 2-A vs 2-A, your logic is invalid
Now come to the match. Even if we goes by the logic of Supes AP = Goku AP, and ignore Goku vast array of abilities to amp his stats and boost his damage, etc... It will come down to hax, both of them have Dura Neg, but Goku have EE and Probability Manip. Goku could Dura neg with every of his strike while Supes Dura Neg is his heat vision which act similar to laser, this is play into Goku favor as he could turn UIO and could maintain it for a pretty long time at will allow him to dodge better, along with Probability Manip allow him to make the heat vision miss, and Goku could just Dura neg him with a ki blast and end the fight. With Information Analysis Goku will have reliable information about Supes and will not drag the fight for fun. He could also use the last resort which is EE that could erase even the soul, unless Supes havefeat of resisting EE at this potent he lose terribly
If you claim you understanding cosmology better, goes question the staffs about this stuffI am not saying SPOM or that Goku wins. I simply disagreed with his poor understanding of 2-A.
How can there be above baseline 2-A?
By scaling chainsHow can there be above baseline 2-A?
Ah yes, calling people children just because you misinterpreted the rules. Great job as always.Is this thread full of 12 years old. That can't comprehend basic logic?
It doesn't matter how big the chain is it as impressive as destoying one multiverse.By scaling chains
Via scaling chains and multipliers. Unless the verse makes it clear that destroying more than one set of infinite universes takes more power, which DC doesn't, then it's cosmology is baseline.How can there be above baseline 2-A?
So we actually agree, but talked past each other. I agree than at least DC isn't follow that rule.Via scaling chains and multipliers. Unless the verse makes it clear that destroying more than one set of infinite universes takes more power, which DC doesn't, then it's cosmology is baseline.
Anyway, Goku seems to one-shot here.
Destroying multiple infinite multiverses are considered equal in AP to destroying 1 infinite multiverse.It doesn't matter how big the chain is it as impressive as destoying one multiverse.
It does follow that rule. If you think otherwise, you're welcome to make a CRT for it.So we actually agree, but talked past each other. I agree than at least DC isn't follow that rule.
What wincon does he have?yeah but supes has a wincon.
I would want this to be added.
whats the winconyeah but supes has a wincon.
I would want this to be added.
No, see the moderator comment.Destroying multiple infinite multiverses are considered equal in AP to destroying 1 infinite multiverse.
I am referring to "Which DC doesn't".It does follow that rule. If you think otherwise, you're welcome to make a CRT for it.
Anyway, does anyone have an issue with me closing this thread.
He's right actually. Destroying 3 multiverses = 1 multiverse without further context.No, see the moderator comment.