speedster352
He/Him- 17,551
- 1,788
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is stated that she applies infinite amounts of magic when using enchant infinity so would the swords work? Anyway so if a character is a different tier and use magic on Asta it wouldn’t work right?The video talks about potency, Merlin has infinite supply of mana, not the same because Merlin is not using infinite mana in potency, she has infinite use of spells, even the costly ones
Asta´s potency surpass Merlin (for now, because NNT has a revision to be done for what I know) so Asta just nulls his spells, now, if he can make her dry of mana or not I don´t know
If you put Asta against a 3-A magic user and the magic user use "nuke", Asta can´t null that, is too strong for his anti magicif a character is a different tier and use magic on Asta it wouldn’t work right?
Are you saying Asta third sword causality manipulation would work in 3a magic?If you put Asta against a 3-A magic user and the magic user use "nuke", Asta can´t null that, is too strong for his anti magic
Is you put Asta against a 3-A magic user and he use a simple sleep spell that needs 20 seconds to work, Asta can null it, because is not potency, is hax
The exception is if that Sleep spell has affected someone with a 3-A magic barrier, then that spell also has potency and Asta would need to use his third sword to use causality, and the spell unless has ******* causality resistance, would be nullify
Hax ignores potency unless shown otherwiseAre you saying Asta third sword causality manipulation would work in 3a magic?
Please drop the attitude it was just a questionSpeedster with his ridiculous takes again
Actually grand cross ragnarok characters are reaching 2c and I am making the sandbox for the profiles. But that’s not the point here I just ask a simple question.Bro no one in NNT is even reaching High 3-A levels of power the verse caps at like 6-B or so
can i see them sandboxes?Actually grand cross ragnarok characters are reaching 2c and I am making the sandbox for the profiles. But that’s not the point here I just ask a simple question.
Sure go to the nnt discussion thread I don’t want to derail this any longercan i see them sandboxes?
It really should be perma tbhChances of you know who's death being perma?
I have faith in disney clover and short jesus astaIt really should be perma tbh
probably wouldn't be all that high compared to what we've already seen tbfIs it calced yet?
You mind if I do it? I like doing calcs, I'd like to be a group member at some point so the more I have accepted, the better.I'll make a calc once they release officials
Are the leaks usually full chapters are partial scans? Maybe we'll get a better viewprobably wouldn't be all that high compared to what we've already seen tbf
napkin math here so it's just very rough and assumes a lot
clover kingdom is ~1843km long
say the slash goes from center to edge, so radius (and length of the slash) 921.5km
i'll say the slash has the proportions of a katana, i.e roughly 1:100 thickness to length ratio and bevel angle of 15 degrees
thickness and thus depth of the cut is 9.215km
cross-sectional area is 42.45811250 km^2 , multiply by length to get volume of 39125.15066875 km^3 or about 3.91251507e+19 cc
use 8j/cc frag for dirt and rock i guess, comes out to 74.8 gigatons or 6-C
i'm prob quite a bit off but i am just assuming a lot
the feat should be ignored, the point here of being something so impressive is because it is a durability negation spell, and it would be easy to explain and understand it with a page of terminology decent , because much is overlooked and wrong in explaining verse terminologyprobably wouldn't be all that high compared to what we've already seen tbf
napkin math here so it's just very rough and assumes a lot
clover kingdom is ~1843km long
say the slash goes from center to edge, so radius (and length of the slash) 921.5km
i'll say the slash has the proportions of a katana, i.e roughly 1:100 thickness to length ratio and bevel angle of 15 degrees
thickness and thus depth of the cut is 9.215km
cross-sectional area is 42.45811250 km^2 , multiply by length to get volume of 39125.15066875 km^3 or about 3.91251507e+19 cc
use 8j/cc frag for dirt and rock i guess, comes out to 74.8 gigatons or 6-C
i'm prob quite a bit off but i am just assuming a lot
We might, I was using I saw on twitter.Are the leaks usually full chapters are partial scans? Maybe we'll get a better view
the feat should be ignored, the point here of being something so impressive is because it is a durability negation spell, and it would be easy to explain and understand it with a page of terminology decent , because much is overlooked and wrong in explaining verse terminology
Oh you didn't see the other one with the damage?We might, I was using I saw on twitter.
Vaguely remember, but no, care to enlighten me?Oh you didn't see the other one with the damage?
This ScanVaguely remember, but no, care to enlighten me?
The denial of durability is in how Jack's magic works, the magic in Black clover works based on "matrices" that carry information on how a spell works, Jack's magic is "cut" that is he is able to apply information of slicing in his magic, he stated that his attack would "slash everything" in front of it, meaning it is a negation of durability based on that, the concept of "slashing"How's it dura negging?
The denial of durability is in how Jack's magic works, the magic in Black clover works based on "matrices" that carry information on how a spell works, Jack's magic is "cut" that is he is able to apply information of slicing in his magic, he stated that his attack would "slash everything" in front of it, meaning it is a negation of durability based on that, the concept of "slashing"
so he conceptually cuts things?The denial of durability is in how Jack's magic works, the magic in Black clover works based on "matrices" that carry information on how a spell works, Jack's magic is "cut" that is he is able to apply information of slicing in his magic, he stated that his attack would "slash everything" in front of it, meaning it is a negation of durability based on that, the concept of "slashing"
LmaoYeah no the feat is being calculated
From what I've seen mashle's terminology explanation makes the same mistake as on the BC page, it is simply assumed that the magic cast by a character comes out of complete nothingness, however in BC this is a more complicated case, since the lack of elaboration of how a spell is cast and the difference between a simple spell and a true spell causes extreme script failures most around Asta with what anti magic can and cannot affectYeah, it should be more likeMashle