- 26,178
- 3,656
- Thread starter
- #81
The feats section didEficiente said:His profile doesn't say this anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The feats section didEficiente said:His profile doesn't say this anymore.
This wasted a lot of my time when I was trying to find that statement there. The link to Reddit should be immediately removed.Edwardtruong2006 said:Law Manip isn't Reddit, it's from Journal 3
This would simplify the progress of the discussion.Antvasima said:@Ricsi
Can you summarise which powers that should be removed?
That is not the reason, at all.Eficiente said:Cal doesn't agree with those, nor am I. Are we supposed to ignore Bill saying what one of his alternative versions was doing? That's ridiculous.
That is a very poor argument. Only because it can be inconsistent, it doesn't mean we will take every source no even if contradictory. There are several contradictions in Naruto, we still won't take the stupid stuff in the guidelinesEficiente said:Canon contradicts canon by a lot, and he has precog on the show.
It is still secondary, and still contradictory.The real cal howard said:One isn't written by Kishimoto. The other is written by Hirsch.
I'm sure you can write down what reason is why you disagree with t. The show containing other contradictions is a poor reason for that.Eficiente said:I'm on phone, my main point is that this needs a discussion first.
I am doing that because it is.Eficiente said:You are taking this "secondary canon" as very lesser to the main one, when the construction of it indicates this to not be the case at all.
What..?Eficiente said:Stop the "it contradicts the main canon", we all know that and you are ignoring on purposes the other points.
The construction of the answers puts them above our usual secondary canon contradictions.Eficiente said:Are we supposed to ignore Bill saying what one of his alternative versions was doing?
It already is a plot hole, your point?Ricsi-viragosi said:He showed to be able to see the future, not infinite possibilities. Taking this inmflates the ability to the point that it becomes a plot hole, which is why it's inconsistent.
Excuse me? It is still not the main canon.Eficiente said:The construction of the answers puts them above our usual secondary canon contradictions.
Again, this argument is poor as it is.Eficiente said:It already is a plot hole, your point?