• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Bill Cipher, reddit and his feats section

Status
Not open for further replies.
Edwardtruong2006 said:
Law Manip isn't Reddit, it's from Journal 3
This wasted a lot of my time when I was trying to find that statement there. The link to Reddit should be immediately removed.
 
Antvasima said:
@Ricsi

Can you summarise which powers that should be removed?
This would simplify the progress of the discussion.
 
Well, since most agreed to remove only stuff that is contradictory, I will summerize in a bit,
 
"All Time-See": Infinite possibilities precog, he wouldstill have precog, but this would also downgrade his inteligence to extraordinary genious for understanding 5D tecnology capable of breaching dimensions. This also counters the Stat amp to an extent.

Math Manip: Being in a quantum state doesn't make him manipulate math.

Enchanted sense also have the alternate timelines removed from them.

I would remove the "removed the teeth of a deer", as this was done in a dream. He has it, but the other justifications are better.


Stuff in the feat section that should be changed is on the OP


And his victories, as lacking the precog changes a lot.

The Vecna one can stay, as he resisted most of the stuff anyways and probability manip made knowing what happens somewhat useless as is.

Demiurge resisted it due to existing outside of time.

Cronus was accasual as well

In the Thanos fight it was assumed only the perpetually increasing inteligence was accepted (my bad), so it should be able to stay.

Monika's fight should be removed, as without knowing what she will do he is going to have many problems with not starting with his best stuff.


That is about it.
 
Okay. I think that should be fine to apply.
 
Abilities:

Precognition (Foresaw the future and predicted exactly what Dipper was about to do in the next few seconds just before he wakes up. Claims to be able to see the future. Asked Soos if he wanted to hear the exact time and date of his death)

Should have the "Claims to be able to see the future" removed


Enhanced Senses (Cross-universal awareness as Bill is capable of viewing different realities via "All-Time Sense" which allows him to perceive & have knowledge of infinite timelines/dimensions, and has knowledge of the past, present, and future. Knows that inanimate objects have feelings too)

Should be changed to: Enhanced Senses (has knowledge of the past, present, and future. Knows that inanimate objects have feelings too, can see through paintings and rapresentations of himself)


Mathematics Manipulation & Quantum Manipulation
should have Math removed


"Limited Statistics Amplification via Intelligence Enhancement from "All-time sense"" Should be removed


Feats:

-Froze time when speaking with Gideo. should be removed


Pulled a deer's teeth from its mouth with a gesture of his hand

Should be removed


Ripped out Dipper's soul and possessed his body should have "by making a deal" added


His acquiring of a physical form and entrance into the universe caused many of its natural laws to be destroyed or distorted .

should be removed


Turned Ford into a statue with a glare and used him as a backscratcher

Should have Turned Ford into a statue with a laser and used him as a backscratcter


  • Due to regaining his physical form after being hit by Quantum Destabilizer, a durability-bypassing weapon, and having an eye with slow Regenerationn will not restrict his regen from having Low-Godly as it is likely PIS.
Should be removed and be changed to:

  • Due to recreating his body from his mindscapers form he should be able to do so again if it were to be destroyed, and having an eye with slow Regenerationn will not restrict his regen from having Low-Godly.
 
All of that seems fine to me. What do you think Saikou?
 
He ripped dipper's soul out of his body before he actually entered the world

While not directly demonstrated, he likely could do it with ease without deals after he entered the world.
 
Because he required deals to do anything before he entered the physical world, but once he did he didn't need deals to do anything
 
It is probably best if the accepted changes are performed, so we can finally close this.
 
Cal doesn't agree with those, nor am I. Are we supposed to ignore Bill saying what one of his alternative versions was doing? That's ridiculous.
 
Eficiente said:
Cal doesn't agree with those, nor am I. Are we supposed to ignore Bill saying what one of his alternative versions was doing? That's ridiculous.
That is not the reason, at all.

We are saying that secondary canon contradicts the min canon, so we are refusing that.
 
Canon contradicts canon by a lot, and he has precog on the show.
 
Eficiente said:
Canon contradicts canon by a lot, and he has precog on the show.
That is a very poor argument. Only because it can be inconsistent, it doesn't mean we will take every source no even if contradictory. There are several contradictions in Naruto, we still won't take the stupid stuff in the guidelines
 
I'm on phone, my main point is that this needs a discussion first.
 
Eficiente said:
I'm on phone, my main point is that this needs a discussion first.
I'm sure you can write down what reason is why you disagree with t. The show containing other contradictions is a poor reason for that.

As it was said above, if contradictory, sources outside of the primary canon are simply ignored. This is true for all verses.

If a contradictory statement from outsidse the maincanon was used for a verse, it should be remved there, not used here
 
If you guys could come to the discussion of WoG on my thread above and discuss it there, then it would be nice ƒæÇƒæÇƒæÇƒæÇƒæÇ
 
You are taking this "secondary canon" as very lesser to the main one, when the construction of it indicates this to not be the case at all.
 
Eficiente said:
You are taking this "secondary canon" as very lesser to the main one, when the construction of it indicates this to not be the case at all.
I am doing that because it is.

We plain ignore stuff that contradicts the main canon, especially when it's WoG like this. That is a standard we have.


When a statement from a character, guidebook, or even word of god contradicts what occurs in the series, they won't be used. For example, if an author says that a character from his work is incapable of shattering planets, even though it has destroyed galaxies on-screen, we will always go with the latter, rather than the former. The statement need to be consistent with what has been revealed within the fictional franchise itself. Otherwise, it will be considered invalid.
 
Stop the "it contradicts the main canon", we all know that and you are ignoring on purpose the other points.
 
Eficiente said:
Stop the "it contradicts the main canon", we all know that and you are ignoring on purposes the other points.
What..?

What other points? Your two main ones were that there are many contradictions, which does not excuse using this, and that he already has shown precog, which (as I already said above) doesn't make it an yless contradictory.

He showed to be able to see the future, not infinite possibilities. Taking this inmflates the ability to the point that it becomes a plot hole, which is why it's inconsistent.
 
Eficiente said:
Are we supposed to ignore Bill saying what one of his alternative versions was doing?
The construction of the answers puts them above our usual secondary canon contradictions.
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
He showed to be able to see the future, not infinite possibilities. Taking this inmflates the ability to the point that it becomes a plot hole, which is why it's inconsistent.
It already is a plot hole, your point?
 
Eficiente said:
The construction of the answers puts them above our usual secondary canon contradictions.
Excuse me? It is still not the main canon.

The rule I just gave you was specifically made and is used on creatsors answers.


Do you actually have an argument beyond this beyong kinda more canon? Because if not than I'll simply ask Ant to open it as more people agreed with the upgrade and our standards agree with it as well
 
Eficiente said:
It already is a plot hole, your point?
Again, this argument is poor as it is.

But it could also be, you know, that he's precog isn't that good?
 
That rule doesn't cover everything, which is why no one is able to give an example of secondary canon being contradicted without being a quite remarkable false equivalence.

Again, this argument is poor as it is.

But it could also be, you know, that he's precog isn't that good?

You claimed "Taking the ability to the point that it becomes a plot hole" which is false, but it being false is a poor argument? What?

And no, his precog was pretty good.
 
That rule doesn't cover everything, which is why no one is able to give an example of secondary canon being contradicted without being a quite remarkable false equivalence

What? The rule was specificly made for this stuff, and Ant actually qouted this in discussions about WoG and Q&A's.

And do I need to point out every time Bill did not predict all possibilities?


You claimed "Taking the ability to the point that it becomes a plot hole" which is false, but it being false is a poor argument? What?

How
is it false? How is Bill being able to predict all possible realities false?

And I said claiming that there already are plotholes, so we can accept secondary canon that contradicts stuff is bad argument, which it is.


And no, his precog was pretty good.

Not really. He showed to lack knowledge on nearly all the important stuff. The best he showed is being able to see some random stuff in the future, not infinite goddamn possibilities
 
Then you, or anybody, try to give an example of something that is actually comparable to this.

>"How is it false?"

>"Not really. He showed to lack knowledge on nearly all the important stuff. The best he showed is being able to see some random stuff in the future"

He knows when the death of two main characters will happen and that it is not caused by him biting the planet or something like that, that is a plot hole in the show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top