- 11,099
- 4,323
I suggest using Mauna Kea for High 7-A
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What tiers exactly have been calculated through pulverisation?Elizhaa said:I think Pulverization should baseline as it has been for most tier, The Causality.
I believe it was for lower tier like 9. Fragmention looks to be the common cacl method for higher tier.Andytrenom said:What tiers exactly have been calculated through pulverisation?Elizhaa said:I think Pulverization should baseline as it has been for most tier, The Causality.
I almost forgot Fragmention. It is used for a lot of Tier 8 and up from I have seen. I think it as baseline is appropriate.Elizhaa said:I think Pulverization should baseline as it has been for most tier, The Causality.
^I'm with that btw. I don't think we should recalc the tier baselines.Matthew Schroeder said:I honestly feel we're being too rigid with Tier Names. They're just supposed to give a general idea.
Yeah, but mountain level can be based on busting any mountain in existence. There is no reason that this mountain can't be North Twin Peak. With that you also have a justification to call this tier so.Andytrenom said:I do not think saying "Mountain level shoul be based on destroying mountains instead of being a random value" is being too rigid with tier names.
If the justification for mountain level and other tiers like that was simply disagreeable that would be one thing, It's the fact that they do not have a justification at all is why it's such a problem.
Our current city block rating is approximately destroying a 63m radius city block with a nuclear explosion. I don't think that is too large?Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:Our current City Block level rating would give us massive city blocks that make no sense at all.
I totaly agree with this. For people who think 3682 meters tall mountain as 7-A baseline seems arbitrary: meter is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in 1/299792458 of a secondAssaltwaffle said:A calculation-based threshold would be arbitrary, true, but there are levels of how arbitrary something is. Our current "hey 100 megatons sounds big so that's our baseline for Mountain"
The thing is, this would have been useful years ago when the tiering system was first getting implemented, but now that we have it recalculting the borders for tiers to be slightly less arbitrary takes enormous effort only for something to be slightly less arbitrary. Basically, it'd be great if we could do it but there's too much work involved, imo.The Causality said:Honestly, I agree to, if needed, change the ends, for exemple, the mountain level end is too arbitrary, picking the average mountain size, calculate the volume and use the pulverization value look good to me IMO
If other Tier are in the same situation then they should be changed.