- 21,492
- 30,821
There are tho, that's the entire point of this thread
Okay so it is a case of art inconsistency?
He was shown to be hit on the cheeks, bruise was shown on the cheeks. Then next bruise on forehead?
YupThis is a mark of blood which could've been wiped off his face in the same exact battle, and we've discussed in several other threads that Oda's small marks of blood are ridiculously inconsistent.
In one page, it's on his cheek.
On the exact next page, which is a few seconds later, it's on his forehead.
I apologize for the heavy head canon accusations, it's just that on both sides it's so prevalent that I can mistake headcanon for misremembering.My bad, it was not head canon just misremembered.
So the point still is he can use haki and it would mean he never attacked Marco once with it?
So basically King would obviously know his haki would stop Marco wounds from regenerating but he didn't use haki cause of what explanation again?
King's not a swordsman. Infusing blades with haki is an advanced swordsman trick which we see with Zoro and Mihawk that it takes a lot of training.
Not really.Isn't it basic armament all that is needed to negate the said regeneration?
And queen fought Marco? No?
And where did you see this! Seriously now bigger assumptions the reason why Marco can regenerate is cause he overpowered king haki with his own haki??
Marco has notable haki. They do not.
Kinda common knowledge superior haki rules supreme. Doffy and Luffy, Law and Yonko, Akainu and Commanders.
And we see Marco can infuse haki on his phoenix talons.
Most likely his superior haki stops them from cutting him permanently or for a long period of time.