MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #41
Bump?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Allowing the use of start/end of chapter blurbs
- Thread starter MinatoSparkle
- Start date
- 15,411
- 15,766
Gonna have to agree with Damage.
- 20,529
- 17,432
Yeah I'm with damage here. This would be like using the back of novel covers as canon feats or power scaling justifications. Those nexts are editor hype blurbs that are to get readers interested in the next chapter/issue. They're not present in the volumes because there's nothing to hype. Its at best secondary canon and really should just generally not be used. Especially when after enough time they're just going to be incredibly difficult to find due to being replaced with other versions of that chapter.
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #44
Why is the back of novels different from the back of volumes which are used? (like in the justification for SM Naruto>SM Jiraiya)
Generations and Revolutions are secondary canon, but they're still used when noncontradictory.
Which is the exact reason I proposed them being used on a case by case basis, not just entirely discarded when arguably lesser canons are used for scaling on the site.
- 31,208
- 27,406
Looks like the majority so far is opposed to this proposal.
- 20,529
- 17,432
It isn't, which is why both should absolutely not be used.
- 6,436
- 1,664
Question, what if the Author has statements of working closely with hos editors and has even mentioned that he gets angry at them for doing a statement without his permission and has taken action against editor's that add things in without his approval?
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #48
- 6,436
- 1,664
yes, hes made comments on it
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #50
Link?
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #51
Something occurred to me. Generations is accepted as canon and used for scaling, despite there being no direct confirmation that Kishi wrote its story content, just that it's canon. Similar story with the novels, and even to an extent with the databooks, as it was implied the staff were a big part of writing those.
How is that different from blurbs not being directly confirmed as being written by Kishimoto but being part of canon material?
How is that different from blurbs not being directly confirmed as being written by Kishimoto but being part of canon material?
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #52
bump
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #55
It's crazy how controversial this is when games are considered canon 
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #57
Source?
- 1,039
- 386
- 21,468
- 30,790
they're their own canon nowIt's crazy how controversial this is when games are considered canon
ain't no way you said source
MinatoSparkle
He/Him- 7,104
- 3,937
- Thread starter
- #60
Isn't that the main Storm games?
They're literally saying it's not written by Kishi with no proof, I think that's a justifiable question
