• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About GER's range

Question, affecting time on a universal scale wasn't high universal instead of universal+? i remember you needing to affect space or the entirety of the timeline to be be universal+
 
Question, affecting time on a universal scale wasn't high universal instead of universal+? i remember you needing to affect space or the entirety of the timeline to be be universal+
High 3-A being 4D was abandoned eons ago. Any time hax is assumed being Low 2-C in Range now.
 
High 3-A being 4D was abandoned eons ago. Any time hax is assumed being Low 2-C in Range now.
I feel like this is wrong but I'll ask Ultima about it.
 
Don't worry, time haxes aren't Low 2-C automatically.
Sure but, range-wise I remember being told (and arguing) that Low 2-C requires affecting an entire timeline, and that affecting a portion of it (such as erasing a few seconds of time) is only High 3-A. I'm 99% sure this is still true since I've argued that in front of Ultima a ton without being corrected, but I'll double check just to be sure.
 
Sure but, range-wise I remember being told (and arguing) that Low 2-C requires affecting an entire timeline, and that affecting a portion of it (such as erasing a few seconds of time) is only High 3-A. I'm 99% sure this is still true since I've argued that in front of Ultima a ton without being corrected, but I'll double check just to be sure.
I remember it, but i heard that wasn't applied anymore

also i wonder why it should be High 3-A, like it was similiar to if you affect 10 seconds of a timeline that is maded of years it's High 3-A but if you affect a the entire timeline that is maded of 5 seconds then it's Low 2-C, I really fail to find the logic behind it, because im pretty sure we don't use Fraimwork as Low 2-C proof
 
Requiring characters to affect the entirety of space/time feels like the best we can do in this situation. Since the alternatives are:
  1. Only treat timelines that explicitly have infinite space and time as Low 2-C.
  2. Let any amount of non-zero effect on 4 axes be Low 2-C. Meaning that if you erase a person for 10 seconds that's considered equivalent to erasing an entire timeline.
  3. #2 except they're not considered equivalent, meaning that characters will be stronger/weaker based on how much time debaters can demonstrate has passed in their timeline. "My character's timeline has lasted for 10 billion years and yours has only lasted for 3 billion, mine AP stomps."
 
Requiring characters to affect the entirety of space/time feels like the best we can do in this situation. Since the alternatives are:
  1. Only treat timelines that explicitly have infinite space and time as Low 2-C.
  2. Let any amount of non-zero effect on 4 axes be Low 2-C. Meaning that if you erase a person for 10 seconds that's considered equivalent to erasing an entire timeline.
  3. #2 except they're not considered equivalent, meaning that characters will be stronger/weaker based on how much time debaters can demonstrate has passed in their timeline. "My character's timeline has lasted for 10 billion years and yours has only lasted for 3 billion, mine AP stomps."
1 Timeline should be 3th Spatial Dimensions and 1 Temporal Dimensions, that is basically uncotnable infinite higher than 3D Infinite, according to physic.
2 Low 2-C need universe sized for qualify
3 Actually i remember in Big Bang CRT that we treat every timelines have infinite time so
 
Sure but, range-wise I remember being told (and arguing) that Low 2-C requires affecting an entire timeline, and that affecting a portion of it (such as erasing a few seconds of time) is only High 3-A. I'm 99% sure this is still true since I've argued that in front of Ultima a ton without being corrected, but I'll double check just to be sure.
Welp, after talking to Ultima he said that small-scale 4-D is Low 2-C range but High 3-A AP, and that no-one's dealt with this discrepancy yet.
 
he can't really be above mih considering...MIH is the only being aside from a omnipotent being who can effect the universe the way he does.(and or move as fast)
 
Uhm... what? GER is literally stated to be above any canon stand from Araki himself, also you're implying that from that statement only God is above MiH while nothing hints to that.
 
he can't really be above mih considering...MIH is the only being aside from a omnipotent being who can effect the universe the way he does.(and or move as fast)
7060306-go_back_to_zero.png
 
uh no. i didnt say only god is above Mih. im saying if a omnipotent being is only stated to be comparable or above MIH's control why does ger scaling make sense here?

2.eh? i thought there was some type of omnipotent god in the jojoverse considering part 7 is a thing...is there something that says that there isnt?
 
uh no. i didnt say only god is above Mih. im saying if a omnipotent being is only stated to be comparable or above MIH's control why does ger scaling make sense here?

2.eh? i thought there was some type of omnipotent god in the jojoverse considering part 7 is a thing...is there something that says that there isnt?
1-Why would MIH be stronger than GER if GER is stated to be above any Stand lol?
2-Yes, there is God
 
Back
Top