Abigail williams (Foreigner) tier upgrade

[Floxiaaa]

Hi! I came with new arguments and evidence. I will explain why the character up the Low 1-A rank.

1)My first argument ;

It encompasses all possible spaces on Earth and in the Outer Universe and is said to exist beyond them. This is also explained in the vsbw profile. I'll leave some evidence below.



My secon argument:

The fact that it covers all possible spaces on Earth and in the outer universe and goes beyond them shows that its power is equal to the Von Neumann universe.

Conclusion :

Abigail Williams (Foreigner) up to Low 1-A

 

[Aseka]

I recall this things have been brought up some times ago, I'll wait for others.

 

[Floxiaaa]

I recall this things have been brought up some times ago, I'll wait for others.

It might have made more sense to open it after the root revision.

 

[Hasty12345]

This has been rejected before and I see no new evidence. I disagree for reasons presented in the previous thread.

 

[Floxiaaa]

This has been rejected before and I see no new evidence. I disagree for reasons presented in the previous thread.

At worst, it should probably reach the Low 1-A tier.

 

[Hasty12345]

At worst, it should probably reach the Low 1-A tier.

I still disagree with a possibly.

 

[Floxiaaa]

I still disagree with a possibly.

I would be happy if you explain with your reasons why you disagree, that is, with your arguments.

 

[Hasty12345]

I would be happy if you explain with your reasons why you disagree, that is, with your arguments.

I disagree for reasons presented in the previous thread.

I would be happy if you explain with your reasons why you disagree, that is, with your arguments.

From the AP page:

Possibly​

Should be used to list a statistic for a character with some basis, but inconclusive due to the justification being vague or non-definitive. The probability of the justification in question for being reliable should be notable, but mild. This term should be used sparingly.

Just because low 1-A is technically a possible interpretation, it doesn't supersede other possible interpretations and we don't award a possibly rating just because something is "possible".

 

[Floxiaaa]

From the AP page:

Just because low 1-A is technically a possible interpretation, it doesn't supersede other possible interpretations and we don't award a possibly rating just because something is "possible".

I did not mean it. I just asked why you didn't join the Low 1-A level.

 

[Hasty12345]

I did not mean it. I just asked why you didn't join the Low 1-A level.

I'm sorry, I am confused by this response. I did explain why?

 

[Railgun]

I did not mean it. I just asked why you didn't join the Low 1-A level.

These scans have been used and rejected before. For the same reasons, Hasty disagrees with Low 1-A

This has been rejected before and I see no new evidence. I disagree for reasons presented in the previous thread.

Can you link the previous thread please? Maybe this will clear up the confusion.

 

[CurrySenpai]

Disagree, I’ve seen these statements before and I especially don’t agree with a Low 1-A interpretation.

 

[Floxiaaa]

These scans have been used and rejected before. For the same reasons, Hasty disagrees with Low 1-A

Can you link the previous thread please? Maybe this will clear up the confusion.

These scans have been used and rejected before. For the same reasons, Hasty disagrees with Low 1-A

Can you link the previous thread please? Maybe this will clear up the confusion.

The fact that it limits all possible spaces and is beyond them shows that it is equal to them. Because in order to limit them, it has to be on an equal level with them. This makes a power level equal to the Von Neumann universe.

 

[Floxiaaa]

These scans have been used and rejected before. For the same reasons, Hasty disagrees with Low 1-A

Can you link the previous thread please? Maybe this will clear up the confusion.

I guess I'll have to see that thread.

 

[Hasty12345]

Can you link the previous thread please? Maybe this will clear up the confusion.

Where Roa's High 1-B Statement Applies, 6 doors Translation, and Where They Both Fit

So, the last threads about this wound up having many misunderstandings on both sides, myself included. So, I want to make this so that we can accept things one by one, and see if they apply to each other. First, the statement that implies a high 1-B cosmology. We have Roa saying "There is no...

vsbattles.com

In this thread the translations were brought into question.

But there's another, I just can't find it.

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

As mentioned above, the same scans and arguments have been used before, And I still disagree with them.

 

[Floxiaaa]

Where Roa's High 1-B Statement Applies, 6 doors Translation, and Where They Both Fit

So, the last threads about this wound up having many misunderstandings on both sides, myself included. So, I want to make this so that we can accept things one by one, and see if they apply to each other. First, the statement that implies a high 1-B cosmology. We have Roa saying "There is no...

vsbattles.com

In this thread the translations were brought into question.

But there's another, I just can't find it.

What you posted has nothing to do with this. There is no similarity to my aforementioned arguments.

 

[Floxiaaa]

As mentioned above, the same scans and arguments have been used before, And I still disagree with them.

I will ask you to throw the thread.

 

[Railgun]

I found this if it is relevant
nvm its not

 

[Floxiaaa]

I found this if it is relevant

I would be happy if you check Discord.

 

[ShinyMagicalGirl]

Just wanted to clarify one thing.

The raws for the Abigail statement mention “every space” rather than the NA scan of “all possible dimensions”.

 

[Floxiaaa]

Just wanted to clarify one thing.

The raws for the Abigail statement mention “every space” rather than the NA scan of “all possible dimensions”.

I still think this would be a possible scale. It is at a level that can be reconciled with Von Neumann. I think it will be examined better when the root revision is completed. So we have to wait for now.

 

[Vayxism]

Agree (cuz the debunk its as*)

 

[Floxiaaa]

Agree (cuz the debunk its as*)

 

[Hasty12345]

2 lines of vague dialogue getting low 1-A when the scans in question literally describe 3D space would be insanity. I wouldn't act like the debunks are ass when the argument is hardly worth considering.

 

[Vlova]

NOT ENOUGH FOR L1A

 

[Floxiaaa]

2 lines of vague dialogue getting low 1-A when the scans in question literally describe 3D space would be insanity. I wouldn't act like the debunks are ass when the argument is hardly worth considering.

Dude, I don't think you have looked at the thread fully, we are talking about an entity that covers all possible spaces and goes beyond them. The fact that you specifically mention "3D space" here shows that you haven't looked at this thread properly.

 

[Floxiaaa]

NOT ENOUGH FOR L1A

I see there are enough arguments.

 

[SweetDao]

2 lines of vague dialogue getting low 1-A when the scans in question literally describe 3D space would be insanity. I wouldn't act like the debunks are ass when the argument is hardly worth considering.

Insanity is a common occurrence here.

 

[Floxiaaa]

Insanity is a common occurrence here.

So what is your comment on this thread?

 

[SweetDao]

So what is your comment on this thread?

I'd say that this alone is not enough, but if there are more scans/information, it might be fine. Right now, there is too little evidence.

 

[Hasty12345]

Dude, I don't think you have looked at the thread fully, we are talking about an entity that covers all possible spaces and goes beyond them. The fact that you specifically mention "3D space" here shows that you haven't looked at this thread properly.

You sent 2 sentences, it takes 1 second to read this thread. You can claim the scans support what you're saying, but they don't. Realms can exist outside the universe without warranting any higher tier and the 6 gates literally refer to 3D space. You have no argument for low 1-A, and these arguments have been rejected in prior threads. There is no reason for this CRT to remain open.

 

[Floxiaaa]

.

I'd say that this alone is not enough, but if there are more scans/information, it might be fine. Right now, there is too little evidence.

Most people do not care about this right now because it is a root revision. I talked to Theoretical and he said he would take care of this issue.

 

[Floxiaaa]

You sent 2 sentences, it takes 1 second to read this thread. You can claim the scans support what you're saying, but they don't. Realms can exist outside the universe without warranting any higher tier and the 6 gates literally refer to 3D space. You have no argument for low 1-A, and these arguments have been rejected in prior threads. There is no reason for this CRT to remain open.

Here, my friend, he also talks about all possible dimensions, apart from the 6 transitions that you just mentioned.

 

[Hasty12345]

dimensions

space*

 

[Floxiaaa]

You sent 2 sentences, it takes 1 second to read this thread. You can claim the scans support what you're saying, but they don't. Realms can exist outside the universe without warranting any higher tier and the 6 gates literally refer to 3D space. You have no argument for low 1-A, and these arguments have been rejected in prior threads. There is no reason for this CRT to remain open.

What was said as Scande 6 gates was only what they knew. These 6 gates do not mean all possible dimensions, only the known dimensions. If you are good with punctuation marks, you will understand this.

 

[Floxiaaa]

space*

The topic will shift to the same place again.

 

[Hasty12345]

only the known dimensions.

DIdn't know left and right were 2 separate dimensions.

 

[Floxiaaa]

DIdn't know left and right were 2 separate dimensions.

The 3D space interpretation you mentioned was interpreted like this by them. All possible dimensions are not limited to these only. This is the direction they know, or rather space. The fact that he puts ... at the end and then says "all possible dimensions" and cannot complete his sentence, meaning that these are the dimensions he knows, he does not know all possible dimensions and that's why he says "all possible dimensions" supports this.

 

[Hasty12345]

Show in the raws where he says "dimensions"