You defined the 6 mentioned directions as 3D space, and I say to you that they define 3D space as such. If this is equivalent to 3 dimensions and they don't know all the other possible dimensions because suddenly they stop counting and say all possible dimensions and this is a sign that they don't know.
If you're not going to show in the raws where it says dimensions, I'm not going to read what you wrote.
I explained this claim in my writings.
I know the things you're talking about. I did not say that "every field" is expression and beyond existing things. It is located at the end of eternal punishments. Please do not give false information. He counts the things he knows and spends some time thinking about the things he doesn't know, and finally says all possible dimensions in the most general definition.
I think there is a language barrier between us.
It seems obvious that some things have been changed in the link you sent. A few words may have been translated incorrectly, but it is not possible for an entire paragraph to be translated incorrectly, and these were accepted at the time.
why
It would be best to do this after the root revision. This is a really complicated business.
It would be weird and ridiculous.
And yet, it happened.
Oh okey
Same here... All of us can...
Can you prove that it is beyond the concept of space time? or that it is superior to all known space-time here?
I don't say 1-A, I say Low 1-A
I think we can continue with this because I'm sure it's not just about 3 dimensions, or in other words, 6 aspects.
