- 359
- 15
Claire FRA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GoldenScorpions said:I'm leaning towards Claire on this one. (ditto)
The Causality said:It's time to make wall of text: (ditto)
I vote for Kotori.
Jimboydejuan12 said:Nah vote Claire for FRA.
Now it is the debate between "GoldenScorpions" and "The Causality" unless some other people further debunk either side.The Causality said:I've precisely answered those reasons, they are no longer valid now.
agree.Jasonsith said:GoldenScorpions said:I'm leaning towards Claire on this one. (ditto)The Causality said:It's time to make wall of text: (ditto)
I vote for Kotori.Jimboydejuan12 said:Nah vote Claire for FRA.Now it is the debate between "GoldenScorpions" and "The Causality" unless some other people further debunk either side.The Causality said:I've precisely answered those reasons, they are no longer valid now.
One thing I don't remember is spacequakes being combat applicable.Huesito88 said:This was first made before Spirits got a slight ap upgrade, so immediately I should switch this to current Claire and Kotori.
AP: The highest value is 3,22 aKa 770 tons but if we arg about the fact that it's 385 Tons, okay, Clair beat other 8-A Baseline easily? okay, the problem is Kotori literally One shot peoples who esaily beat 770/385 tons, it isn't comparable to claire. even if we doesn't talk about a One shot, she still have a Massive AP advantage who allow her to beats easily Claire, Kotori can potentially One Shot.GoldenScorpions said:Oh, boy, here we go. Those argument are for Base Claire.
AP:
It's simple to understand, she is able to one shot people who can easily beats characters with 385/770 tons, right? basically she one shot people who can easily beat characters stronger than claire.GoldenScorpions said:AP: What you're saying is Kotori (385 tons), can one-shot other characters (385 tons) who can themselves easily beat people that scale to 385 tons? Uhm, with what and how? So you're saying 385 tons > 385 tons > 385 tons... I don't follow. And I wouldn't liken a x2.5 gap to "massive AP advantage".