This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The following is a description of a certain character's capability. I'm wondering if it grants any tier, or maybe a likely/possibly.
I'm thinking Low 1-A due to similar reason to the Downstreamers, but I'd like to hear more opinions.
The Boundless tier don't have a clear defination, and this can work.
This Tier completely supasses all other tiers, and they are within the BOUNDARY of modern Mathematics, so the Boundless tier can be defined as "Transcending Modern Mathematics", and this fits it and the tiering system well.
What qualifies as a higher dimensional bulk space in the context of the Low 2-C definition on the tiering system page?
Like say you have this all encompassing “astral sea” and within it are these spheres that represent entire universes. Presupposing they aren’t compactified, would this “astral...
I admire the attempt to tier characters across all fiction, but I can no longer deny that it is a fundamentally flawed concept that I wish I could get out of my mind. However, what happens here on VS Battles is worse than that. It is outright nonsense.
This site literally has created its own...
By believing in the tiering system I mean you think it can accurately describe a character's capabilities along with the other systems. That is to say, whatever a well researched VSBW says is something that applies to the character. When you say a character is X tier, they are really X tier...
Within our tiering system, we have used the phrase multiple times.
"Being “infinitely” stronger than this level, unless uncountably so, does not qualify for any higher tier."
"An uncountably infinite number, assumed to be the cardinality of the real numbers themselves"
"such exceed any...
If the characters look at the timeline 3 layers is fiction. Will he get 1-A from r>f trancescede or not ? because the character is not bound by time and time doesn't work for him?
I have a few questions about the new tiering system. I want to know what the difference is between Qaulitive superior and qaunlitive superior, and how do meta quality and meta quanlity work? And is there an example case of Qaunlitive superior and Qaulitive superior? How can I do it?
The title. Making this because I’ve been absent from the site for quite some time and this is new to me.
So it came to my attention recently that we treat Big Bangs as “non-physical” events since the Big Bang pretty much is just expanding space-time upon creation of whatever is getting created...
Okay guys there is something that confuses me. Can be cutting or warping extradimensional space count as attack potency since it effects something extradimensional ? Or we will take it as hax?
I would like to propose a revision to Tier 5 and Tier High 5-A, as well as a minor correction to Tier 5-C’s description. [Thread creation by non-staff member approved by Antvasima]
Currently Tier High 5-A uses erroneous scientific nomenclature as it is named “Dwarf Star level” and is described...
Revisions Tier 2
In the vsbw arrived at the section of Tier 2: Multiversal, we have several multiversal thirds out in this same tier have the power scale such:
Low 2-C = Exploit significantly on a zone of spaces representing universal sizes of space-time continuums.
Low 1-C = Exploit on spaces...
Hi all.
So, a bit ago, I made this thread. It got accepted, and the result of it was the discarding of the previous purely mathematical basis for tiers Low 1-A and above. These tiers, then, were changed to the following:
Here, you can see a fairly clear progression on how the Tiering System...
According to the clip, the characters destroy a star but it is not specified what kind of star it is. But it's smaller than the moon. He should get a tier 5-C or 5-B ?. The impact on the world is nothing at all. There is still daytime and nighttime, plus there is the matter of the stars as...
If you destroy the moon/sun, there will still be an episode. day and night Can it really be destroyed and get an AP impact? Does it look like an illusion or not?
I have a few questions about Aleph after I read the tiering system.
There are an infinite number of 4D universes where each universe will produce branches but only one universe
The second explanation is similar to the previous explanation, there are an infinite number of universes but each...
since a certain someone decided to tb me from a general discussion thread, i will now spread my cancer across the site. Rejoice.
So currently,spacetime continuums that are smaller than universal in size fail to meet the requirements for low-2C.
However, this line of reasoning fails to grasp on...
So in the range page, we have Universal range which is pretty much baseline 3-A and "up"
Then it goes directly to Universal+ range, which is Low 2-C aka 4-D range
The issue is the "up" in question.
Does Univeral range account for infinite ranged attacks/pockets dimensions, basically High 3-A...
Alright say there's a Universe that 6-D (let's say all the universes meet the standards for there dimensions) inside that 6-D Universe there's a infinite amount of 5-D Universes within these 5-D Universes there's a infinite amount of 2-A Multiverse and in every single Universe in the 2-A...
Alr, here we go! I'd like to mention that I obtained permission from @Qawsedf234 🙏
Simply put, by our current standards, an "inclusive temporal dimension" that spans more than one space-time continuum is sufficient to qualify for Low 1-C.
But, something is missing here. That is, whether the...
Dawn and Darkness cosmology:
https://dawn-and-darkness.fandom.com/wiki/The_World_Cosmology
Don't worry guys, I am totally mentally stable and not mentally not good 😊
FAQ:
Problematic part:
This structure can then be generalized to any amounts of dimensions, and is also the reason destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). So, for example, a spacetime...
received permission from @IdiosyncraticLawyer
Currently, we treat space and time as seperate entities, as shown by the space and time manipulation pages being separated, and how tier 2 works. Here's why this is massively incorrect.
The Theory of Relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein in the...
There's something I've wondered about for quite a while.
We have two 4D universes (L2C according to wiki standards) within one realm/dimension. So between them there will be a 5th axis. This will make feats at levels 2C to 2A into L1C. So how should we make them truly L1C? I read the...
A multiverse contain nine different universes with infinite possibilities (nine 2-A structures), separated from each other by a gap called "interval of worlds" but they are still govern by the same system, Concepts type 1 and laws of the universe (physics).
In each branch there is a finite or...
Since this was made a staff discussion, and most users can't comment on it, I thought it would be good, for the rest of us, to be able to speak their thoughts on it. It seems like something like this could potentially, change the tiering system and affect majority of the profiles on this site...
Or, "Why did I make this system? Am I stupid?"
This thread has certainly been a long time coming. And though its placement in the general discussion board makes this clear already, it is probably best that I say it explicitly: I don't actually have any interest in bringing any changes to the...
This is a CRT to revise which tier we will grant to someone who transcend the abstraction of dimension, or the concept of dimensionality.
For me personally, I think limited to the geometrical and physical dimensions that exist in the verse will suffice for their tier.
With the CRT of SMT...
The question is this:
-In the Verse, the first time this structure is mentioned, it was already known that in addition to Our Universe, Heaven and Hell existed.
We are told that between Our Universe and Heaven as well as between Our Universe and Hell there is a "Dimensional Wall", said...
What Tier is a character that can affect a structure with the following characteristics:
-exists beyond reality.
-time and space are irrelevant or do not exist directly in it.
-There are no concepts such as distance and direction in it.
Ah well, as obvious as it is, the "Bigger than 2-A" standard has been a blurry thing for more than a year. I don't really see any proper staff consensus on it. At many places some knowledgeable staff and members have said it's Low 1-C and that bigger than 2-A while still being 2-A is impossible...