Tier 0 description

[JimedBro2020]

Y'all should probably edit the description for Tier 0 to make it less confusing for people. Ex: people thinking it's a size limit which isn't the full picture.

From what I can see, Tier 0 isn't just a matter of size but more so a state of being. Something which isn't limited by sheer size alone but seen through its likeness. While yes, I know the omnipotence page probably has something similar to attributing Tier 0 as a state of being. The tier itself should be less confusing for people?

Like this? (First draft):

Entities described not by their size or position but by their state of being as they are completely transcendent over any and all forms of hierarchical and cosmological extensions—the collection of all possible "qualities" represented by High 1-A+, encompassing and exceeding it utterly, existing beyond any and all distinctions between ontologies and any division—only explained through states and attributes beyond differentiation, change, divisibility, and affability, as they are completely unsurpassable. See this page for more information on both this tier and the preceding one.

 

[ROZAN-U]

that's just people misunderstanding it then. The explanation already says they are beyond any distinction and attribution.

 

[JimedBro2020]

that's just people misunderstanding it then. The explanation already says they are beyond any distinction and attribution.

Not... Really? It's there but it's a bit vague and under a shadow as the first few sentences focus more so about its scale rather than addressing that the tier is supposed to be a state separate from and beyond size.

The average or above average joe ain't gonna be brainstorming about tier 0 and would rather focus more so that it's an "up there"

 

[ROZAN-U]

Not... Really? It's there but it's a bit vague and under a shadow as the first few sentences focus more so about its scale rather than addressing that the tier is supposed to be a state separate from and beyond size.

The average or above average joe ain't gonna be brainstorming about tier 0 and would rather focus more so that it's an "up there"

ngl your average joe wouldn't even care about anything above multiversal.
people who understand beyond 1-A can see it being above size.
Size is generally a quantitative characteristic which 1-A already is qualitatively superior to.
and even if talk about size in qualitative . Tier 0 is beyond any quality and hierarchical extension

 

[JimedBro2020]

ngl your average joe wouldn't even care about anything above multiversal.
people who understand beyond 1-A can see it being above size.
Size is generally a quantitative characteristic which 1-A already is qualitatively superior to.
and even if talk about size in qualitative . Tier 0 is beyond any quality and hierarchical extension

Yes, tier 0 is beyond size that's already been established. What I'm saying is to make the description a bit more clear on conveying that it's a state of being rather than just being a bigger form of size (quantitative and qualitative)

Tier 0 can be "described" in any verse's cosmological hierarchy because it isn't bound by said verse