This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
If he's referring to IM's lasers, that would make The Destroyer Low 6-B+ (4.67 Teratons of TNT). Which is fairly consistent since the 6-B Thor feat is rather casual on his part.
That's....an odd reason to disregard a statement like that. He destabilized the core, which destroyed asgard. Which was ragnarok. Which was what he is referring to when he made the statement.
Considering he's specifically talking about it's destructive capacity. And "light em up" is a common term for outright destruction. It's incredibly wierd how that statement was interpreted hyper literally.
Yeah, so pretty blatant statement. Not to mention the passive energy of the Nano Gauntlet could "light up a continent" Thanos endured that energy twice. Several characters harmed him and scale to it.
Ah, that was the one I saw then. Though I think there was also one more, can't remember who...
The the only thing implying that is the 100× grand canyon statement. Which, while valid, is a little tricky to scale to the whole planet. Especially when we're never shown a full comparison to the crater compared to the planet.
This has been calced off site in Tier 5 (I believe 5-B)
Imo it's...
Yup, that's why I think the calcs used is a massive lowball. We also see the beam produce a shockwave. Meaning there was force behind it, but no one wants to calc it.
If you're talking about the dyson sphere. Then yeah, I think the outer casing is supposed to neutralize all the properties of the star until it was restarted.
Honestly, without direct confirmation of its age, it seems like too much headcannon to assume it's so much older than any others and therefore has less energy. Does Eitri mention how long the Forge has been active? I think he might've.
The one you least expect gave the information I was referring. It was stated in the movie that the norns take your life force. This was also brought up in the script (though I forget exactly where).
Base Ronan or with the stone? Cause Base is a little iffy. The scan doesn't specifically say he's being amped through the stone. But it's heavily implied in the movie he is.
Although, each additional world amplifying it could still imply it's base power is planetary. Which is backed up by the deleted scene (also the other stones have planetary statements).
It's on the profile, but there's no proof of it. I recently rewatched the movie (cause it really isn't THAT bad). There's no indication that it's amped. Jane then states right after "not just a planet or a star. He's going to destroy everything." Or something along those lines.
I remember the whole debate was something like Thor breaking the Bifrost bridge doesn't scale him to that energy because he only broke the containment. I don't remember the whole thing (cause I don't agree with it). But I remember someone tried arguing that it's similar to defusing a bomb. Just...
I'm really tired (and lazy), look up Thor arrests Sokovias momentum. You may be able to find the scan, if not I'll find it tomorrow.
Though I do want to note, there is a statement made by IM that he was going to "keep the atomic action doubling back" implying that Thors AP was doubled. But...
I mean Thor should scale anyway since Thor destroyed the damn thing. That whole High 6-C calc is a ridiculous low end. Especially considering Sokovia was going to cause the destruction seen in the vision if it wasn't stopped.
I think the main issue with the intensity is IIRC there was a statement about Jotunheims structural integrity being weakened due to not having the Casket in their possession anymore. I could be remembering wrong but if not that could be a point of contention.