• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Expanding the References for Common Feats page

I mean I could do it I guess, you would just need to open the page for me

All I have to do is add the calcs in the OP right?
That and try not to make it look like a mess like I ended up doing to the Car Feats thing because I can't make a table for ***** and giggles.
 
I mean I could do it I guess, you would just need to open the page for me

All I have to do is add the calcs in the OP right?
I think I can do that, I'm confident in my formatting
Thank you very much for the help. I will unlock the References page then.

Wasn't somebody supposed to give the page much better organisation as well though?
 
Wasn't somebody supposed to give the page much better organisation as well though?
I don't have the time to do this, I can add the calcs to the page to the best of my ability, but to completely organize the entire thing is just something I have no time for
 
Okay. No problem. Just try to add the new calculations with somewhat organised placements according to the current structure of the page please.
 
Okay. Thank you very much for helping out. It is extremely appreciated.

@JTGamer96

Do you remember which staff members who said that they would give the References page better organisation?
 
Is the air really frozen in most city freezing cases in fiction though? Feel like usually it's just ice being formed on buildings and stuff while the air is just a bit chilly.
 
Rejected by Ugarik

Prolly needs an evaluation, I'm not particularly good with deriving speed from acceleration.

This was supposed to be evaluated but it never went anywere. I guess it looks good at a glance, but I request further input from calc members.

I evaluated and accepted this, also asking that all the sources be properly linked.
 
So, I guess the second and the third ones can (or almost) be added to the page. We just need some more evaluations for the two.
 
Shouldn't destroying helicopters be added to here? Because those are very common feats
 
There are probably too many way to do so for it to be included.
 
Explosions, ripping it to pieces, flattening it, et cetera.
 
Shouldn't destroying helicopters be added to here? Because those are very common feats
Wait, I could've sworn there was one for the average helicopter which wielded 9-A ish to my knowledge.
Well actually, that's the durability of an AH-50 Attack Helicopter from Crysis.

The two helicopters we have for The Real World on this wiki, the Mil Mi-24 and Boeing AH-64 Apache only possess durabilities ranging from Wall level to Wall level+. Not to mention that we don't really have any common feat blogs for helicopter destroying.
 
Nope, that's not the one I meant, I meant more on the lines of baseline 9-A, barely higher than car-busting.
Hmm, I've been looking for it, but haven't found it yet.

Anyway, let's see if we can add feats from here and get more evaluations if necessary. Do they seem fine?
 
Unfortunately, @Jasonsith is also busy; he's having troubles with his account.

Now, is there anyone else that'd like to add the accepted feats from here to the References for Common Feats page?
 
This was supposed to be evaluated but it never went anywere. I guess it looks good at a glance, but I request further input from calc members.
Eh, I wanted to redo that one. Just forgot about it, as redoing it is somewhat complicated.

The problem with the current calc is that it assumes that a superhuman super fast sprinter takes as many steps per second as a real human. That assumption of course doesn't hold: A person with super speed can also take much more steps per second.

And before someone asks: No I don't have time to add and evaluate lots of calcs right now
 
Thank you. Itseems like Ugarik, KLOL, and Dark-Carioca have all replied.
 
Isn't destroying average wooden chairs viable tho? What energy would they yield?
 
Back
Top