• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
16,614

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Can you look into this?

    Hi, Ultima
    Basically this from the Math page:
    The Hierarchy of Large Cardinals is fairly extensive and contains many exotic-named numbers, but the most conventional and easily-understood entry point to it are the Inaccessible Cardinals: Infinite cardinal numbers that are uncountable, regular (cannot be defined as the union of quantities smaller than themselves) and strong limit (cannot be attained through repeated power set operations), which in layman's terms, means that they cannot be reached from lesser cardinals in any way, shape or form, standing beyond their scope entirely. The following is a good illustration of an Inaccessible Cardinal's relation to lesser numbers:
    Shouldn't the part I bolded be removed since we now only treat qualitative superiority as that and treat even large cardinals as ultimately quantifiable?
    was curious about smth after the tier system revision ,do you have any plan on overhauling concept manipulation types or definitions?
    Is this an uncountably infinite number?

    everything in the universe is existing at/on some coordinate in space and time (infinite coordinates per thing/object [most particularly stars, and Atoms]) the infinitely many existing things individually (by themselves [for example an individual atom]) are creating infinite branches in time per coordinate in 3D space and infinitely more branches per coordinate in/on the temporal axis these individually infinitely existing things exist on
    Hey, Utima, at your convenience, can you check/ evaluate the below?. Thanks!!


    Your input would be helpful 🙏 🙏
    In a universe with infinite r>fs, there is a character that encompasses a structure that is inaccessible even if its infinite permutations combine, and that extends its entire life. What could be the answer to this question? Can you give me a detailed explanation?
    Good day. It seems ridiculous to me to ask such a question, but I had to ask it because someone I was arguing with right now did not accept it. I would be happy to help you.

    Seeing a 1A+ hierarchy as part of one's own dream. In short, does establishing R>F superiority make you 1A+ or H1A again? Because the person I'm arguing with argues that R>F only holds for 1A and 1A+. Is that correct? Is R>F insufficient to reach tier H1A?
    Good afternoon, someone made a topic, I found it interesting and decided to help, maybe this idea is valid with this new information that I provided, if so,Could you give your conclusion whether it is really valid or not?

    Hello, could you please comment here and let us know if the void qualifies as a Type 2 beyond-dimensional existence

    Hey Ultima
    Cam you comment on if this qualitys as R>F?

    Cam you comment on if this qualitys as R>F?
    Hi Ultima, can you evaluate this thread?
    Hey man
    Could you evaluate this please?
    Thanks
    Can u pls evaluate this void of nothingness related thread🙏 The staff and ppl that have replied here are all saying different things and presenting different interpretations of said things, some even a little different than yours. It would be kind of you if you can take a look here.
    Hey Ultima could you check out this thread? A while back you said you would check it out... and I'd really appreciate it.

    Some question about higher D. Isnt if some space naturally curled and twisted inside out, it indicate if there are extra dimensional axis
    So is Regulus pretty confidently gonna 1-A? I still don’t understand why being unbound by these concepts with no proof of qualitative superiority would make you unable to be harmed by things below 1-A could you explain
    0d491fd5dedb00d3cfadc39bd086f096.png
    About American Gods

    Is this qualitative superiority ?
    With that, he began to walk. He remembered how he had felt on
    the carousel, tried to feel like that...
    He remembered turning the Winnebago, shifting it at right angles
    to everything. He tried to capture that sensation—
    And then, easily and perfectly, it happened.
    It was like pushing through a membrane, like plunging up from
    deep water into air. With one step he had moved from the tourist path
    on the mountain to...
    To somewhere real. He was Backstage.
    He was still on the top of a mountain, that much remained the
    same. But it was so much more than that. This mountaintop was the
    quintessence of place, the heart of things as they were. Compared to it,
    the Lookout Mountain he had left was a painting on a backdrop, or a
    papier-mâché model seen on a TV screen—merely a representation of
    the thing, not the thing itself.
    This was the true place
    . p418
    Can I have permission to comment on this topic?


    Could you comment here on the "if the feat being an outlier invalidates it being an anti-feat for 1-A" problem?
    Deagonx said you must come or SMT will be downgraded to below tiering.

    Robo432343
    Robo432343
    dude he got the ping
    no need to be so clingy about it
    Huesito88
    Huesito88
    Can never hurt to write on the wall
    Ultima, if there is a realm of concepts that has all characteristics for the concepts to be type 1 concepts, but does not have any mention of having any of the concepts that can be tiered, and has no mention of concepts of space, time, logic, infinite, mathematic , dimensions, etc., the only things the realm of concept has is it holds archetype, prototype, essence, template, etc., for all things, can it be tiered or will it depend on the cosmology? Or can we assume it has concepts like space, time, dimensions for it to be low 1A or 1A since it has concepts for all things?
    Hi Ultima, this Tier 0 thread is going on pretty long inactive. We've also planned to do collective verse page for Honkai games and Gun Girl Z if this got accepted. I've also summerized all the counter arguments and my debunks to them. I know you planned to come here one day but I hope it'd be sonner :3

    If there are infinite layers R/F, A views all of them like fiction (a R/F that beyond all hierarchy above), so A could be High 1-A? And B views A like a fiction (R/F qualified) so B could be High 1-A 1 layer?
    One simple question

    There are singularity when all plurality becomes one, the closer you get to this singularity the stronger you become, and evantually will become one it self

    Are this can make you low 1A or 1A? I know a singularity or oneness alone cannot make you outerverse, but if it literally stated the more you getting closer to it the more superior you are, isnt that indicate transcendence and not only just lack of differentiation
    Ultima_Reality
    Fixxed
    Fixxed
    "Four becomes three, three becomes two, two becomes one. The closer to singularity we are, the stronger we become. This is the order of grauvenoah, the individual world in which we live."

    Just that and no anti feats
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top