• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
16,635

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hi Ultima.

    There are some criticisms of modal realism that modal realism postulates an excessive number of objects - an infinite number of possible worlds - leading to an unnecessarily large ontology that violates Occam's razor, which favors simpler theories with fewer objects. What do you think about this? I asked this question elsewhere, but I want to hear your perspective on it.
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    This isn't really a criticism of modal realism in se so much as a question of "Why would you believe that?". And I mean, I don't believe in MR, so, ask someone who does?
    Sorry to disturb you Ultima, but can you help evaluating this thread?

    Thanks in advance.

    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Guh.

    Yeah, I'll check. My internet is horrendous lately so my return to the wiki is gonna be a bit slow, but, will try.
    Rakih_Elyan
    Rakih_Elyan
    Thanks a lot Ultima
    Hi, sorry to disturb you, but please if you have the time, can you please give your 2 cents in this thread?
    Hello, I just wanted to ask you the validity of a certain scan and what tier it might suppose, would dms be find or is your message wall good enough?
    Hi, Ultima
    Some questions:
    Premise: If let's say in a verse, there is a system governing all reality level, non 1-A and 1-A ones included.

    Q1: If a being from a lower reality is able to ascend to a higher reality via reincarnation or via transmigration because the system itself intervenes each time to reconstruct the form of said being from non 1-A to the same nature as the 1-A composite in question, is such an ascension valid and not anti feat as a higher power is involved directly?

    Q2: If a 1-A being can "enter" a lower reality via manifesting in a body (created by the system or by themselves) that is of the same qualitative nature/composite as the lower reality, such a feat is valid because the characters are not entering the non 1A reality in their true form/1A form, right?

    Need some input here if possible
    Hey Ultima, hello! Listen, there's been talk for over a month now that Dark Tower should be H1A. We know you're busy, but there are a handful of people waiting for your response. Here, I'll leave a link here to show you what I'm talking about. WE WILL BE WAITING FOR YOU.

    Sorry for the inconvenience, but could you check this CRT? It is related to another CRT that you participated in.
    hey, Ultima

    if a character is bound by logic, can that still make him tier 0 if he has monadic statements?
    Hello, could you please comment here and let us know if the R>F qualifies as a 1-A

    hey Ultima,

    Do you think that God in Bruce and Evan Almighty, played by Morgan Freeman, could be ineffable, based on theory/concept, even if the films do not mention such a thing, but just as speculatively, to say that although God is presented in human form while dealing with characters like Bruce Nolan and Evan Baxter, but his true true form remains a mystery. Do you think that would be suggest at the ineffable nature of God that what can be known is only a part of His true form?
    Hi, Ultima.

    Where would a construct with a complex number of dimensions, as in dimensional axes, scale?
    For context, the complex number constitutes of infinite imaginary dimensions and 1 real dimension, where would a space that contains this structure scale?
    Can you look into this?

    Hi, Ultima
    Basically this from the Math page:
    The Hierarchy of Large Cardinals is fairly extensive and contains many exotic-named numbers, but the most conventional and easily-understood entry point to it are the Inaccessible Cardinals: Infinite cardinal numbers that are uncountable, regular (cannot be defined as the union of quantities smaller than themselves) and strong limit (cannot be attained through repeated power set operations), which in layman's terms, means that they cannot be reached from lesser cardinals in any way, shape or form, standing beyond their scope entirely. The following is a good illustration of an Inaccessible Cardinal's relation to lesser numbers:
    Shouldn't the part I bolded be removed since we now only treat qualitative superiority as that and treat even large cardinals as ultimately quantifiable?
    was curious about smth after the tier system revision ,do you have any plan on overhauling concept manipulation types or definitions?
    Is this an uncountably infinite number?

    everything in the universe is existing at/on some coordinate in space and time (infinite coordinates per thing/object [most particularly stars, and Atoms]) the infinitely many existing things individually (by themselves [for example an individual atom]) are creating infinite branches in time per coordinate in 3D space and infinitely more branches per coordinate in/on the temporal axis these individually infinitely existing things exist on
    Hey, Utima, at your convenience, can you check/ evaluate the below?. Thanks!!


    Your input would be helpful 🙏 🙏
    In a universe with infinite r>fs, there is a character that encompasses a structure that is inaccessible even if its infinite permutations combine, and that extends its entire life. What could be the answer to this question? Can you give me a detailed explanation?
    Good day. It seems ridiculous to me to ask such a question, but I had to ask it because someone I was arguing with right now did not accept it. I would be happy to help you.

    Seeing a 1A+ hierarchy as part of one's own dream. In short, does establishing R>F superiority make you 1A+ or H1A again? Because the person I'm arguing with argues that R>F only holds for 1A and 1A+. Is that correct? Is R>F insufficient to reach tier H1A?
    Good afternoon, someone made a topic, I found it interesting and decided to help, maybe this idea is valid with this new information that I provided, if so,Could you give your conclusion whether it is really valid or not?

    Hello, could you please comment here and let us know if the void qualifies as a Type 2 beyond-dimensional existence

  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top