It said fourth at the time of the warning drop, which means he is going a little crazy with the edits, having done four in the time since I began writing the message to sending it. I'll look into it.
I wasn't so much fishing for a number, I presumed it'd just be indefinite.
I see. It may be that the inclusion of edits that aren't rule violations is making me perceive this more generously than I usually would- noting that, I'm open to longer or indefinite if you'd prefer that?
I believe so. I just wanted to get a second opinion to make sure.
Last time we did not. So, not sure, I cited all fandom regulations and ours in this post.
Since I’m related to this, I’m just gonna say that me and Coom know eachother well, and I wouldn’t have even considered reporting this, despite being the one he said it to
Users should know better. This isn't a place for inside jokes if they violate our rules.
Not that I am involved, but I don't want users here to see this conversation and perceive it as an unfair case or “mod abuse”.
He has been warned, and banned multiple times for being toxic iirc. And this really steps over that line, I'd say a permaban is in order.
Your comment was deleted as you're not staff nor are you the reported party, but this sentiment gets expressed often so I'll address it. In the absolute best case scenario the only mitigating information that could be offered was "I was joking and we're friends." There's no real reason to wait around for that kind of info because, as we showed above, our rules don't change in that circumstance. You can't tell people to kill themselves on this forum, period.
Then, if I may ask, why the similiar case prior to this is excluded and excused? When I approached a report against the same exact offense here, it got rejected because of the defense, and @Deagonx already explained why it is irrelevant.
Monkeman wasn't even banned iirc, though I may misremember. And I also don't entirely remember Coomander's full history, the name sounds familiar as someone I recall getting reported and banned for hostile/toxic behavior towards Damage. I know, case by case scenario but the post getting removed is a bare minimum yes. And I am open for second opinions.Then, if I may ask, why the case prior to this is excluded and excused? Since when I approached a report against the same exact offense here, it got rejected because of the defense, and @Deagonx already explained why it is irrelevant.
I am talking about this case:
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
Bambu has rolled backed the edits and blocked them.vsbattles.com
He was temporary banned for 1 month. @Deagonx, @Crabwhale, @Mr._Bambu can vouch this.
It is treated the same as n-word from the perspective of our rules and Fandom off-site regulations.
By reading the "Site Rules" page.
I am submitting a re-evaluation to my report. I don't think the case is any different to this one. As you have stated, the joke part is not an excuse against the rule, and the user in question had many warnings and was temporarily banned before. So I highly doubt about not awareness of the existence of the rule, and by no means he is immune to it.
I believe it's unnecessary for me to be a staff member or directly involved in the case to report someone on the forum. My purpose here is to ask for a reconsideration of my own case.
I hardly remember the Offsite and Discussion rules and I literally made a CRT on those, lol.
